Virtual 3 Fr PCI system for complex percutaneous coronary intervention

EuroIntervention

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 515-517

  Matsukage, Takashi ^a   Yoshimachi, Fuminobu ^b   Masutani, Motomaru ^c   Saito, Shigeru ^d   Nakazawa, Gaku ^a   Masuda, Naoki ^a   Ogata, Nobuhiko ^a   Morino, Yoshihiro ^a   Ikari, Yuji ^a  

^a TOKAI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b AOMORI PREFECTURAL CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c HYOGO COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^d SHONAN KAMAKURA GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RAPAMYCIN;

AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CATHETER; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; GUIDE WIRE; GUIDING CATHETER; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RADIAL ARTERY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HISTOLOGY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY VESSELS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 77950485077     PISSN: 1774024X     EISSN: 19696213     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4244/EIJV5I4A82     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Metz D, Meyer P, Touati C, Coste P, Petiteau PY, Durand P, Faivre R, Lefevre T, Elaerts J. Comparison of 6F with 7F and 8F guiding catheters for elective coronary angioplasty: results of a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. Am Heart J 1997;134(1):131-7. (Pubitemid 27329034)
2. Gwon HC, Doh JH, Choi JH, Lee SH, Hong KP, Park JE, Seo JD. A 5Fr catheter approach reduces patient discomfort during transradial coronary intervention compared with a 6Fr approach: a prospective randomized study. J Interv Cardiol 2006;19(2):141-7.
3. Meyer P, Durand P, Metz D, Butto N, Touati C, Gervais A. Six French sheathless coronary angioplasty using a novel technique to introduce the guiding catheter: the INTRUC, a preliminary retrospective study. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998;43(3):331-5.
4. Mamas MA, Fath-Ordoubadi F, Fraser DG. Atraumatic complex transradial intervention using large bore sheathless guide catheter. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008;72(3):357-64.
5. Takeshita S, Saito S. Transradial coronary intervention using a novel 5-Fr sheathless guiding catheter. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009; Apr 27. Epub ahead of print.
6. Youssef A, Hsieh YK, Cheng CI, Wu CJ.A single transradial guiding catheter for right and left coronary angiography and intervention. EuroIntervention 2007;3:475-481.
7. Yoshimachi F, Masutani M, Matsukage T, Saito S, Ikari Y. Kissing balloon technique within a 5 Fr guiding catheter using 0.010 inch guidewires and 0.010 inch guidewire-compatible balloons. J Invasive Cardiol 2007;19(12):519-24. (Pubitemid 351209466)
8. Matsukage T, Yoshimachi F, Masutani M, Katsuki T, Saito S, Takahashi A, Iida K, Katahira Y, Michishita I, Tanabe K and others. A new 0.010-inch guidewire and compatible balloon catheter system: the IKATEN registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009;73(5):605-10.
9. Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999;46(2):173-8. (Pubitemid 29066623)
10. Ikari Y, Nagaoka M, Kim JY, Morino Y, Tanabe T. The physics of guiding catheters for the left coronary artery in transfemoral and transradial interventions. J Invasive Cardiol 2005;17(12):636-41.