Kissing balloon technique within a 5 Fr guiding catheter using 0.010 inch guidewires and 0.010 inch guidewire-compatible balloons

Journal of Invasive Cardiology

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 519-524

  Yoshimachi, Fuminobu ^b   Masutani, Motomaru ^c   Matsukage, Takashi ^a   Saito, Shigeru ^d   Ikari, Yuji ^a  

^a TOKAI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b AOMORI PREFECTURAL CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c HYOGO COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^d SHONAN KAMAKURA GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bifurcation lesions; Ikazuchi 10 balloon

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BALLOON CATHETER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DRUG ELUTING STENT; GUIDE WIRE; IN VITRO STUDY; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; NONHUMAN; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; SWINE; ANGINA, UNSTABLE; ANIMAL; CASE REPORT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; DISEASE MODEL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FOLLOW UP; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; RADIOGRAPHY; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGINA, UNSTABLE; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; ANIMALS; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; SWINE;

EID: 38949127303     PISSN: 10423931     EISSN: 15572501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Gobeil F, Lefevre T, Louvard Y, et al. Coronary angioplasty using 5 French guiding catheters: Preliminary experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;51:107-109.
2. Hamon M, Sabatier R, Zhao Q, et al. Mini-invasive strategy in acute coronary syndromes: Direct coronary stenting using 5 Fr guiding catheters and transradial approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;55:340-343.
3. Coelho WM, Jacob JL, Araujo Filho JD, et al. Direct stent implantation using a 5F guiding catheter and transradial approach. Arq Bras Cardiol 2004;83:240-242; 237-239.
4. Ijsselmuiden AJ, Tangelder GJ, Cotton JM, et al. Direct coronary stenting compared with stenting after predilatation is feasible, safe, and more cost-effective in selected patients: Evidence to date indicating similar late outcomes. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 2003;5:143-150.
5. Kern MJ, Talley JD, Deligonul U, et al. Preliminary experience with 5 and 6 French diagnostic catheters as guiding catheters for coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1991;22:60-63.
6. Dahm JB, Vogelgesang D, Hummel A, et al. A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6 French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;57:172-176.
7. Rakhit RD, Matter C, Windecker S, et al. Five French versus 6 French PCI: A case control study of efficacy, safety and outcome. J Invasive Cardiol 2002;14:670-674.
8. Pinkerton CA, Slack JD. Complex coronary angioplasty: A technique for dilatation of bifurcation stenoses. Angiology 1985;36:543-548.
9. Castriz JL, Canales ML, Reynolds DW. Kissing balloon technique in complex PTCA: Single guiding catheter and dual wire rapid exchange system. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993;28:358-360.
10. den Heijer P, Bernink PJ, van Dijk RB, et al. The kissing balloon technique with two over-the-wire balloon catheters through a single 8-French guiding catheter. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1991;23:47-49.
11. Ikari Y, Nagaoka M, Kim JY, et al. The physics of guiding catheters for the left coronary artery in transfemoral and transradial interventions. J Invasive Cardiol 2005;17:636-641.
12. Waser M, Meier B. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of the left main coronary artery with a 5Fr catheter system. J Interv Cardiol 1995;8:639-641.
13. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ. Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary stent implantation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993;30:173-178.
14. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ. Transradial artery Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent implantation: Results of a single-center feasibility study. Am Heart J 1995;130:14-21.
15. Saito S, Tanaka S, Hiroe Y, et al. Comparative study on t ransradial approach vs. transfemoral approach in primary stent implantation for patients with acute myocardial infarction: Results of the test for myocardial infarction by prospective unicenter randomization for access sites (TEMPURA) trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;59:26-33.
16. Ziakas AA, Klinke BP, Mildenberger CR, et al. Safety of same-day-discharge radial percutaneous coronary intervention: A retrospective study. Am Heart J 2003;146:699-704.
17. Louvard Y, Benamer H, Garot P, et al. Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiography and angioplasty in octogenarians (the OCTOPLUS study). Am J Cardiol 2004;94:1177-1780.
18. Cooper CJ, El-Shiekh RA, Cohen DJ, et al. Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: A randomized comparison. Am Heart J 1999;138:430-436.
19. Stella PR, Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, et al. Incidence and outcome of radial art ery occlusion following transradial art ery coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997;40:156-158.
20. Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999;46:173-178.
21. Wakeyama T, Ogawa H, Iida H, et al. Intima-media thickening of the radial artery after transradial intervention. An intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1109-1114.