Representation sharpening can explain perceptual priming

Neural Computation

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1312-1332

  Moldakarimov, Samat ^a   Bazhenov, Maxim ^a,b   Sejnowski, Terrence J ^a,c  

^a HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ADAPTATION; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; HUMAN; LEARNING; MENTAL FUNCTION; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; TIME; VISION; VISUAL CORTEX;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ALGORITHMS; HUMANS; LEARNING; MENTAL PROCESSES; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; NEURONS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77950413419     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2009.04-09-999     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N.K. (2001). Visual competition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 3, 1-11.
2. Bogacz, R., & Brown, M.W. (2003). Comparison of computational models of familiarity discrimination in the perirhinal cortex. Hippocampus, 13, 494-524.
3. Desimone, R. (1996). Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 93, 13494-13499.
4. Foeller, E., & Feldman, D.E. (2004). Synaptic basis for developmental plasticity in somatosensory cortex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 14, 89-95.
5. Freedman, D.J., Riesenhuber, M., Poggio, T., & Miller, E.K. (2006). Experiencedependent sharpening of visual shape selectivity in inferior temporal cortex. Cereb. Cortex, 16, 1631-1644.
6. Friston, K., Kilner, J., & Harrison, L. (2006). A free energy principle for the brain. J. Physiol. Paris, 100, 70-87.
7. Gold, J.I., & Shadlen, M.N. (2007). The neural basis of decision making. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 30, 535-574.
8. Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006). Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn. Sci., 10, 14-23.
9. Gruber, T., & Muller, M.M. (2002). Effects of picture repetition on induced gamma band responses, evoked potentials, and phase synchrony in the human EEG. Cognitive Brain Res., 13, 377-392.
10. Hebb, D.O. (1949). The organization of behavior. New York:Wiley.
11. Hubel, D.H., & Wiesel, T.N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J. Physiol., 195, 215-243.
12. Levy, D.A., Stark, C.E.L., & Squire, L.R. (1997). Intact conceptual priming in the absence of declarative memory. Psychol. Science, 15, 680-686.
13. Li, L., Miller, E.K., & Desimone, R. (1993). The representation of stimulus familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. J. Neurophysiol., 69, 1918-1929.
14. Logothetis, N.K., Leopold, D.A., & Sheinberg, D.L. (1996).What is rivaling during binocular rivalry? Nature, 380, 621-624.
15. Marsolek, C.J. (2008).What antipriming reveals about priming. Trends Cogn. Sci., 12, 176-181.
16. Marsolek, C.J., Schnyer, D.M., Deason, R.G., Ritchey, M., & Verfaellie, M. (2006). Visual antipriming: Evidence for ongoing adjustments of superimposed visual object representations. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci., 6, 163-174.
17. McMahon, D.B., &Olson, C.R. (2007). Repetition suppression in monkey inferotemporal cortex: Relation to behavioral priming. J. Neurophysiol., 97, 3532-3543.
18. Miller, E.K., & Desimone, R. (1994). Parallel neuronal mechanism for short-term memory. Science, 263, 520-522.
19. Miller, K.D. (1996). Synaptic economics: Competition and cooperation in synaptic plasticity. Neuron, 17, 371-374.
20. Mitchell, D.B. (2006). Nonconscious priming after 17 years: Invulnerable implicit memory? Psychological Science, 17, 925-929.
21. Norman, K.A., & O'Reilly, R.C. (2003).Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory:Acomplementary-learning-systems approach. Psychol. Rev., 110, 611-646.
22. Polonsky, A., Blake, R., Braun, J., & Heeger, J. (2000). Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nature Neurosci., 3, 1153-1159.
23. Rainer, G., & Miller, E.K. (2000). Effects of visual experience on the representation of objects in the prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 27, 179-189.
24. Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (2000). Models of object recognition. Nature Neurosci., 3, 1199-1204.
25. Ringo, J.L. (1996). Stimulus specific adaptation in inferior temporal and medial temporal cortex of the monkey. Behav. Brain Res., 76, 191-197.
26. Sawamura, H., Orban, G.A., & Vogels, R. (2006). Selectivity of neuronal adaptation does not match response selectivity: A single-cell study of the FMRI adaptation paradigm. Neuron, 49, 307-318.
27. Schacter, D.L., & Buckner, R.L. (1998). Priming and the brain. Neuron, 20, 185-195.
28. Schacter, D.L., Wig, G.S., & Stevens, W.D. (2007). Reductions in cortical activity during priming. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 17, 171-176.
29. Sohal, V., & Hasselmo, M.E. (2000). A model for experience-dependent changes in the responses of inferotemporal neurons. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 11, 169-190.
30. Tong, F., Meng, M., & Blake, R. (2006). Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends Cogn. Sci., 10, 502-511.
31. Tulving, E., & Schacter, D.L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247, 301-306.
32. Usher, M., &McClelland, J.L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychol. Rev., 108, 550-592.
33. Watanabe, T., Nanez, J.E., Koyama, S., Mukai, I., Liederman, J., & Sasaki, Y. (2002). Greater plasticity in lower-level than higher-level visual motion processing in a passive perceptual learning task. Nature Neurosci., 5, 1003-1009.
34. Wig, G.S., Grafton, S.T., Demos, K.E., & Kelley, W.M. (2005). Reductions in neural activity underlie behavioral components of repetition priming. Nature Neurosci., 8, 1228-1233.
35. Wiggs, C.L., &Martin, A. (1998). Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 8, 227-233.
36. Wilson, H.R. (2003). Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 100, 14499-14503.
37. Wilson, H.R., & Cowan, J.D. (1972). Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. Biophysical Journal, 12, 1-24.