From potential forecast to foresight of Turkey's renewable energy with Delphi approach

Energy

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1973-1980

  Celiktas, Melih Soner ^a   Kocar, Gunnur ^a  

^a EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Delphi; Energy; R D; Renewable energy; Science; Technology; Technology foresight

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; LEAD ACID BATTERIES; SURVEYS; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING; TECHNOLOGY;

DELPHI METHOD; DELPHI STUDY; ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS; ENERGY DEMANDS; LIVING STANDARDS; ONLINE SURVEYS; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; RESEARCH STUDIES; SCIENCE TECHNOLOGIES; SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE; SWOT ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY FORESIGHT;

RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

DELPHI ANALYSIS; DEMAND ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FORECASTING METHOD; LIVING STANDARD; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

TURKEY;

EID: 77950370584     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.01.012     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Björn L., and Lübeck L. Foresight - a successful project, with many lessons learned. The second international conference on technology foresight, Tokyo (2003), Swedish Technology. http://www.nistep.go.jp/IC/ic030227/pdf/p3-6.pdf [retrieved 03 August 2009]
2. Cuhls K. From forecasting to foresight processes-new participative foresight activities in Germany. Journal of Forecasting 22 (2003) 93-111
3. Coates J.F. Foresight in federal government policymaking. Futures Research Quarterly 1 (1985) 29-53
4. Martin B.R. Foresight in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 7 2 (1995) 139-168
5. Jeradechakul W, Sripaipan C, Jewell T. Multi-economy foresight activities of the APEC center for technology foresight. In: The second international conference on technology foresight, Tokyo; 2003. Available from: http://www.nistep.go.jp/IC/ic030227/ic030227-e.html [retrieved 03 August 2009].
6. Martin B.R., and Irvine J. Research foresight: priority-setting in science (1989), Pinter Publishers, London and New York [also published as Irvine J, Martin BR. Research foresight: creating the future, Zoetermeer: Netherlands Ministry of Education and Science;1989]
7. Salo A.A. Incentives in technology foresight. International Journal of Technology Management 21 7/8 (2001) 694-710
8. Goker A. A technology foresight study model proposal for Turkey ("Turkiye icin teknoloji ongoru calismasi model onerisi" için hazirlik çalismasi). METU Economy Congress; 2001. Available from: [retrieved 03 August 2009].
9. Durand T. Twelve lessons from 'Key Technologies 2005': the French technology foresight exercise. Journal of Forecasting 22 (2003) 161-177
10. REN 21. Renewable energy policy network for the 21st century. Renewables global status report. 2009 Update (2009), REN21 Secretariat, Paris. http://www.unep.fr/shared/docs/publications/RE_GSR_2009_Update.pdf [retrieved 12 August 2009]
11. Kolarz K.C., Stańczyk K., and Kapusta K. Technology foresight for a vision of energy sector development in Poland till 2030. Delphi survey as an element of technology foresighting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 3 (2009) 327-338
12. Rikkonen P., and Tapio P. Future prospects of alternative agro-based bioenergy use in Finland-constructing scenarios with quantitative and qualitative Delphi data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 7 (2009) 978-990
13. Pätäri S. Industry and company level factors influencing the development of the forest energy business-insights from a Delphi Study. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 77 (2010) 94-109
14. Verbruggen A. Renewable and nuclear power: a common future?. Energy Policy 36 11 (2008) 4036-4047
15. Faulin J., Lera F., Pintor J.M., and García J. The outlook for renewable energy in Navarre: an economic profile. Energy Policy 34 15 (2006) 2201-2216
16. Utgikar V.P., and Scott J.P. Energy forecasting: predictions, reality and analysis of causes of error. Energy Policy 34 17 (2006) 3087-3092
17. Ronde P. Delphi analysis of national specificities in selected innovative areas in Germany and France. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 70 5 (2003) 419-448
18. Iniyan S., and Sumathy K. The application of a Delphi technique in the linear programming optimization of future renewable energy options for India. Biomass and Bioenergy 24 1 (2003) 39-50
19. Suganthi L., and Williams A. Renewable energy in India - a modelling study for 2020-2021. Energy Policy 28 15 (2000) 1095-1109
20. Iniyan S., and Sumathy K. An optimal renewable energy model for various end-uses. Energy 25 (2000) 563-575
21. Islas J., Manzini F., and Masera O. A prospective study of bioenergy use in Mexico. Energy 32 (2007) 2306-2320
22. Schenk N.J., Moll H.C., Potting J., and Benders R.M.J. Wind energy, electricity, and hydrogen in the Netherlands. Energy 32 (2007) 1960-1971
23. Lund P.D. The link between political decision-making and energy options: assessing future role of renewable energy and energy efficiency in Finland. Energy 32 (2007) 2271-2281
24. Bhattacharya S.C., and Jana C. Renewable energy in India: historical developments and prospects. Energy 34 (2009) 981-991
25. In: Miles I., and Keenan M. (Eds). Practical guide to regional foresight in the United Kingdom (versions of this report are published in every EU15 country except Luxembourg,) (2003), European Commission, Luxembourg. 92 894 4682 X. http://cordis.europa.eu/foresight/cgrf.htm EUR 20478
26. NISTEP. Japan National Institute of Science and Technology Policy 2009; 20.07.2009. Available from: http://www.nistep.go.jp/achiev/ftx/eng/rep052e/pdf/1_.pdf.
27. Hsu C.C., and Stanford B.A. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus, practical assessment. Research & Evaluation 12 10 (2007). Available from: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=12&n=10 [retrieved 27 December 2009]
28. Celiktas M.S., Sevgili T., and Kocar G. A snapshot of renewable energy research in Turkey. Renewable Energy 34 6 (2009) 1479-1486
29. Celiktas M.S., and Kocar G. A quadratic helix approach to evaluate the Turkish renewable energies. Energy Policy 37 (2009) 4959-4965
30. Terrados J., Almonacid G., and Pérez-Higueras P. Proposal for a combined methodology for renewable energy planning. Application to a Spanish region. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13 (2009) 2022-2030
31. Resch G., Held A., Faber T., Panzer C., Toro F., and Haas R. Potentials and prospects for renewable energies at global scale. Energy Policy 36 (2008) 4048-4056
32. Verbruggen A., and Lauber V. Basic concepts for designing renewable electricity support aiming at a full-scale transition by 2050. Energy Policy 37 (2009) 5732-5743
33. TEIAS. Turkish electrical energy 10-year generation capacity projection report (2009), Turkish Electricity Transmission Company. http://www.teias.gov.tr/projeksiyon/KAPASITEPROJEKSIYONU2009.pdf [retrieved 11 August 2009]
34. Ak S. The 18th Annual meeting of the Board of Governors of the EBRD (15-16 May 2009), European Board of Reconstruction and Development, London. http://www.ebrd.com/new/am/program/aksinan.pdf [retrieved 11 August 2009]
35. Unal A.A., Sargin A.H., Ozlu H., Gundogdu H., Koktas M., Senol O., Donma S., and Ozkaya S.Y. Turkey water report (2009), General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works. http://www.dsi.gov.tr/english/pdf_files/TurkeyWaterReport.pdf [retrieved, 11 August 2009]
36. EUREC. The future for renewable energy. 2. Prospects and directions (2002), EUREC Agency (European Renewable Energy Centres Agency), Brussels. Available from: www.eurec.be [retrieved 12 May 2009]
37. Eurendel. Technology and social visions for Europe's energy future a Europe-wide Delphi study, final report; 2004. Available from: http://www2.izt.de/eurendel/ [retrieved 12 August 2009].
38. Lund H., and Mathiesen B.V. Energy system analysis of 100% renewable energy systems - the case of Denmark in years 2030 and 2050. Energy 34 (2009) 524-531
39. Chang J., Leung D.Y.C., Wu C.Z., and Yuan Z.H. A review on the energy production, consumption, and prospect of renewable energy in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 7 (2003) 453-468
40. IEA, World energy outlook 2007. China and India Insights; 2007. Available from: http://www.iea.org/Textbase/about/copyright.asp [retrieved 04 July 2009].
41. Goldemberg J. The promise of clean energy. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 2185-2190
42. Doukas H., Mannsbart W., Patlitzianas K.D., Psarras J., Ragwitz M., and Schlomann B. A methodology for validating the renewable energy data in EU. Renewable Energy 32 (2007) 1981-1998
43. Energy [r]evolution. A sustainable world energy outlook report (January 2007), Greenpeace International, European Renewable Energy Council (EREC). http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/energyrevolution-250107 [retrieved 28.12.2009]