Factors influencing online control of video-aiming movements performed without vision of the cursor

Psychological Research

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 182-195

  Veilleux, Louis Nicolas ^a   Proteau, Luc ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; LEARNING; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77950351454     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-009-0229-z     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abahnini, K., & Proteau, L. (1999). The role of peripheral and central visual information for the directional control of manual aiming movements. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53(2), 160-175.
2. Bagesteiro, L. B., Sarlegna, F. R., & Sainburg, R. L. (2006). Differential influence of vision and proprioception on control of movement distance. Experimental Brain Research, 171(3), 358-370.
3. Bédard, P., & Proteau, L. (2003). On the role of peripheral visual afferent information for the control of rapid video-aiming movements. Acta Psychologica, 113(1), 99-117.
4. Bédard, P., & Proteau, L. (2004). On-line vs. off-line utilization of peripheral visual afferent information to ensure spatial accuracy of goal-directed movements. Experimental Brain Research, 158(1), 75-85.
5. Bédard, P., & Proteau, L. (2005). Movement planning of video and of manual aiming movements. Spatial Vision, 18(3), 275-296.
6. Carlton, L. G. (1981). Processing visual feedback information for movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7(5), 1019-1030.
7. Cheng, D. T., Luis, M., & Tremblay, L. (2008). Randomizing visual feedback in manual aiming: reminiscence of the previous trial condition and prior knowledge of feedback availability. Experimental Brain Research, 189(4), 403-410.
8. Darling, W. G., & Cooke, J. D. (1987). Changes in the variability of movement trajectories with practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19(3), 291-309.
9. Desmurget, M., Epstein, C. M., Turner, R. S., Prablanc, C., Alexander, G. E., & Grafton, S. T. (1999). Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nature Neuroscience, 2(6), 563-567.
10. Desmurget, M., Rossetti, Y., Prablanc, C., Stelmach, G. E., & Jeannerod, M. (1995). Representation of hand position prior to movement and motor variability. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 73(2), 262-272.
11. Elliott, D., & Allard, F. (1985). The utilization of visual feedback information during rapid pointing movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A Human Experimental Psychology, 37(3), 407-425.
12. Elliott, D., & Calvert, R. (1990). The influence of uncertainty and premovement visual information on manual aiming. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44(4), 501-511.
13. Elliott, D., Carson, R. G., Goodman, D., & Chua, R. (1991). Discrete vs. continuous visual control of manual aiming. Human Movement Science, 10(4), 393-418.
14. Elliott, D., & Madalena, J. (1987). The influence of premovement visual information on manual aiming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A Human Experimental Psychology, 39(3), 541-559.
15. Goodale, M. A., Pelisson, D., & Prablanc, C. (1986). Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature, 320(6064), 748-750.
16. Gordon, J., Ghilardi, M. F., Cooper, S. E., & Ghez, C. (1994). Accuracy of planar reaching movements. II. Systematic extent errors resulting from inertial anisotropy. Experimental Brain Research, 99(1), 112-130.
17. Guigon, E., Baraduc, P., & Desmurget, M. (2008). Computational motor control: feedback and accuracy. European Journal of Neuroscience, 27(4), 1003-1016.
18. Hansen, S., Glazebrook, C. M., Anson, J. G., Weeks, D. J., & Elliott, D. (2006). The influence of advance information about target location and visual feedback on movement planning and execution. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(3), 200-208.
19. Harris, C. M., & Wolpert, D. M. (1998). Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature, 394(6695), 780-784.
20. Heath, M. (2005). Role of limb and target vision in the online control of memory-guided reaches. Motor Control, 9(3), 281-311.
21. Khan, M. A., Elliott, D., Coull, J., Chua, R., & Lyons, J. (2002). Optimal control strategies under different feedback schedules: kinematic evidence. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34(1), 45-57.
22. Khan, M. A., Franks, I. M., & Goodman, D. (1998). The effect of practice on the control of rapid aiming movements: Evidence for an interdependency between programming and feedback processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A Human Experimental Psychology, 51(2), 425-443.
23. Khan, M. A., Lawrence, G., Fourkas, A., Franks, I. M., Elliott, D., & Pembroke, S. (2003). Online versus offline processing of visual feedback in the control of movement amplitude. Acta Psychologica, 113(1), 83-97.
24. Lateiner, J. E., & Sainburg, R. L. (2003). Differential contributions of vision and proprioception to movement accuracy. Experimental Brain Research, 151(4), 446-454.
25. Lemay, M., Gagnon, S., & Proteau, L. (2004). Manual pointing to remembered targets.but also in a remembered visual context. Acta Psychologica, 117(2), 139-153.
26. Lhuisset, L., & Proteau, L. (2002). Developmental aspects of the control of manual aiming movements in aligned and non-aligned visual displays. Experimental Brain Research, 146(3), 293-306.
27. Lhuisset, L., & Proteau, L. (2004). Planning and control of straightahead and angled planar movements in adults and young children. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(4), 245-258.
28. Lyons, J., Hansen, S., Hurding, S., & Elliott, D. (2006). Optimizing rapid aiming behaviour: Movement kinematics depend on the cost of corrective modifications. Experimental Brain Research, 174(1), 95-100.
29. Mackrous, I., & Proteau, L. (2007). Specficity of practice results from differences in movement planning strategies. Experimental Brain Research, 183(2), 181-193.
30. Messier, J., & Kalaska, J. F. (1997). Differential effect of task conditions on errors of direction and extent of reaching movements. Experimental Brain Research, 115(3), 469-478.
31. Messier, J., & Kalaska, J. F. (1999). Comparison of variability of initial kinematics and endpoints of reaching movements. Experimental Brain Research, 125(2), 139-152.
32. Meyer, D. E., Abrams, R. A., Kornblum, S., Wright, C. E., & Smith, J. E. (1988). Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychological Review, 95(3), 340-370.
33. Neely, K. A., Tessmer, A., Binsted, G., & Heath, M. (2008). Goaldirected reaching: Movement strategies influence the weighting of allocentric and egocentric visual cues. Experimental Brain Research, 186(3), 375-384.
34. Novak, K. E., Miller, L. E., & Houk, J. C. (2002). The use of overlapping submovements in the control of rapid hand movements. Experimental Brain Research, 144(3), 351-364.
35. Novak, K. E., Miller, L. E., & Houk, J. C. (2003). Features of motor performance that drive adaptation in rapid hand movements. Experimental Brain Research, 148(3), 388-400.
36. Papaxanthis, C., Pozzo, T., & McIntyre, J. (2005). Kinematic and dynamic processes for the control of pointing movements in humans revealed by short-term exposure to microgravity. Neuroscience, 135(2), 371-383.
37. Prablanc, C., & Martin, O. (1992). Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 67(2), 455-469.
38. Proteau, L. (2005). Visual afferent information dominates other sources of afferent information during mixed practice of a video-aiming task. Experimental Brain Research, 161(4), 441-456.
39. Proteau, L., & Isabelle, G. (2002). On the role of visual afferent information for the control of aiming movements toward targets of different sizes. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34(4), 367-384.
40. Proteau, L., & Masson, G. (1997). Visual perception modifies goaldirected movement control: Supporting evidence from a visual perturbation paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A Human Experimental Psychology, 50(4), 726-741.
41. Proteau, L., Roujoula, A., & Messier, J. (2009). Online control of video aiming movements: fast and efficient corrections of undetected experimentally-induced errors. Journal of Motor Behavior, in press.
42. Robin, C., Toussaint, L., Blandin, Y., & Proteau, L. (2005). Specficity of learning in a video-aiming task: modifying the salience of dynamic visual cues. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37(5), 367-376.
43. Sarlegna, F., Blouin, J., Bresciani, J. P., Bourdin, C., Vercher, J. L., & Gauthier, G. M. (2003). Target and hand position information in the online control of goal-directed arm movements. Experimental Brain Research, 151(4), 524-535.
44. Sarlegna, F., Blouin, J., Vercher, J. L., Bresciani, J. P., Bourdin, C., & Gauthier, G. M. (2004). Online control of the direction of rapid reaching movements. Experimental Brain Research, 157(4), 468-471.
45. Saunders, J. A., & Knill, D. C. (2003). Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements. Experimental Brain Research, 152(3), 341-352.
46. Saunders, J. A., & Knill, D. C. (2004). Visual feedback control of hand movements. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(13), 3223-3234.
47. Saunders, J. A., & Knill, D. C. (2005). Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control both the direction and distance of pointing movements. Experimental Brain Research, 162(4), 458-473.
48. Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S., & Quinn, J. T, Jr. (1979). Motor-output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological Review, 47(5), 415-451.
49. Selen, L. P., Beek, P. J., & van Dieen, J. H. (2006). Impedance is modulated to meet accuracy demands during goal-directed arm movements. Experimental Brain Research, 172(1), 129-138.
50. van Beers, R. J., Haggard, P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004). The role of execution noise in movement variability. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91(2), 1050-1063.
51. van Beers, R. J., Wolpert, D. M., & Haggard, P. (2002). When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Current Biology, 12(10), 834-837.
52. Whitney, D., Westwood, D. A., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object. Nature, 423(6942), 869-873.
53. Woodworth, R. S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review Monographs, 3(Whole No. 13), 1-119.