Specificity of practice results from differences in movement planning strategies

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 183, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 181-193

  Mackrous, Isabelle ^a   Proteau, Luc ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Internal model; Kinesthesis; Learning; Manual aiming; Movement control; Movement planning; Visual feedback

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINESTHESIA; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ANISOTROPY; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 34848844921     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1031-z     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bédard P, Proteau L (2005) Movement planning of video and of manual aiming movements. Spat Vis 18:275-296
2. Charvin M, Proteau L (1996) Developmental differences in the processing of afferent information for motor control. Dev Neuropsychol 2:347-387
3. Chicoine A, Lassonde M, Proteau L (1992) Developmental aspects of sensorimotor integration. Dev Neuropsychol 8:381-394
4. Desmurget M, Grafton S (2000) Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci 4:423-431
5. Elliott D, Allard F (1985) The utilization of visual feedback information during rapid pointing movements. Q J Exp Psychol 37:407-425
6. Elliott D, Calvert R (1990) The influence of uncertainty and premovement visual information on manual aiming. Can J Exp Psychol 44:501-511
7. Elliott D, Carson RG, Goodman D, Chua R (1991) Discrete vs. continuous visual control of manual aiming movements. Hum Mov Sci 10:393-418
8. Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47:381-391
9. Ghilardi MF, Gordon J, Ghez C (1995a) Deafferented subjects do not compensate for workspace anisotropies of limb movements. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 95:73P-73P (71)
10. Ghilardi MF, Gordon J, Ghez C (1995b) Learning a visuomotor transformation in a local area of work space produces directional biases in other areas. J Neurophysiol 73:2535-2539
11. Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Cooper SE, Ghez C (1994) Accuracy of planar reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 99:112-130
12. Hansen S, Glazebrook CM, Anson JG, Weeks DJ, Elliott D (2006) The influence of advance information about target location and visual feedback on movement planning and execution. Can J Exp Psychol 60:200-208
13. Harris CM, Wolpert DM (1998) Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394:780-784
14. Khan MA, Franks IM (2003) Online versus offline processing of visual feedback in the production of component submovements. J Mot Behav 35:285-295
15. Khan MA, Franks IM, Goodman D (1998) The effect of practice on the control of rapid aiming movements: evidence for an interdependency between programming and feedback processing. Q J Exp Psychol 51:425-443
16. Khan MA, Franks IM, Elliott D, Lawrence GP, Chua R, Bernier PM, Hansen S, Weeks DJ (2006) Inferring online and offline processing of visual feedback in target-directed movements from kinematic data. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30:1106-1121
17. Lhuisset L, Proteau L (2004) Planning and control of straight-ahead and angled planar movements in adults and young children. Can J Exp Psychol 58:245-258
18. Meyer DE, Abrams RA, Kornblum S, Wright CE, Smith JE (1988) Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychol Rev 95:340-370
19. Novak K, Miller L, Houk J (2002) The use of overlapping submovements in the control of rapid hand movements. Exp Brain Res 144:351-364
20. Novak K, Miller L, Houk J (2003) Features of motor performance that drive adaptation in rapid hand movements. Exp Brain Res 148:388-400
21. Proteau L (1992) On the specificity of learning and the role of visual information for movement control. In: Proteau L, Elliott D (eds) Vision and motor control, vol 85. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 67-103
22. Proteau L (2005) Visual afferent information dominates other sources of afferent information during mixed practice of a video-aiming task. Exp Brain Res 161:441-456
23. Proteau L, Carnahan H (2001) What causes specificity of practice in a manual aiming movement: vision dominance or transformation errors? J Mot Behav 33:226
24. Proteau L, Cournoyer J (1990) Vision of the stylus in a manual aiming task: the effect of practice. Q J Exp Psychol 42A:811-828
25. Proteau L, Marteniuk RG, Girouard Y, Dugas C (1987) On the type of information used to control and learn an aiming movement after moderate and extensive training. Hum Mov Sci 6:181-199
26. Proteau L, Al Roujoula A, Messier J (2007) Online control of video-aiming movements: fast and efficient corrections of undetected experimentally-induced errors. Unpublished data
27. Robin C, Toussaint L, Blandin Y, Proteau L (2005) Specificity of learning in a video-aiming task: modifying the salience of dynamic visual cues. J Mot Behav 37:367-376
28. Rossetti Y, Desmurget M, Prablanc C (1995) Vectorial coding of movement: vision, proprioception, or both? J Neurophysiol 74:457-463
29. Soucy MC, Proteau L (2001) Development of multiple movement representations with practice: specificity versus flexibility. J Mot Behav 33:243-254
30. Tremblay L, Proteau L (1998) Specificity of practice: the case of powerlifting. Res Q Exerc Sport 69:284-289
31. Virji-Babul N, Sainburg RL, Huang H, Ghez C (1997) Rate of learning novel limb dynamics depends on the nature of feedback signals. Soc Neurosci 85