Reliable methods of judgement aggregation

Journal of Logic and Computation

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 603-617

  Hartmann, Stephan ^a   Pigozzi, Gabriella ^b   Sprenger, Jan ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG   (Luxembourg)

Author keywords

Bayesian analysis; Distance based procedures; Judgment aggregation; Majority fusion operator; Social choice

Indexed keywords

ADVISORY BOARDS; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; DISTANCE-BASED; FUSION OPERATOR; HIGHER WEIGHT; MAJORITY VOTING; PROBABILISTIC MODELS; SOCIAL CHOICE;

DECISION MAKING;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 77950351150     PISSN: 0955792X     EISSN: 1465363X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/logcom/exp079     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. N. Baigent. Preference proximity and anonymous social choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, 161-169, 1987.
2. L. Bovens and W. Rabinowicz. Democratic answers to complex questions. An epistemic perspective. Synthese, 150, 131-153, 2006.
3. B. Chapman. Rational aggregation. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 1, 337-354, 2002.
4. F. Dietrich. Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems. Journal of Economic Theory, 126, 286-298, 2006.
5. F. Dietrich and C. List. Arrow's theorem in judgement aggregation. Social Choice andWelfare, 29, 19-33, 2007.
6. D. Eckert and J. Mitlöhner. Logical representation and merging of preference information, Multidisciplinary IJCAI-05 workshop on advances in preference handling, pp. 85-87, 2005.
7. S. Konieczny and E. Grégoire. Logic-based approaches to information fusion. Information Fusion, 7, 4-18, 2006.
8. S. Konieczny and R. Pino-Pérez. Merging with integrity constraints. In Fifth European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU'99), 233-244, 1999.
9. L.A. Kornhauser and L.G. Sager. Unpacking the court. Yale Law Journal, 96, 82-117, 1986.
10. L.A. Kornhauser and L.G. Sager. The one and the many: adjudication in collegial courts. California Law Review, 81, 1-51, 1993.
11. C. List. The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions. Social Choice and Welfare, 24, 3-32, 2005.
12. C. List and P. Pettit. Aggregating sets of judgements: an impossibility result. Economics and Philosophy, 18, 89-110, 2002.
13. C. List and C. Puppe. Judgment aggregation: a survey. In, P. Anand, P. Pattanaik and C. Puppe, eds, Oxford Handbook of Rational and Social Choice, Oxford University Press, 2009.
14. M. K. Miller and D. Osherson. Methods for distance-based judgement aggregation. Social Choice and Welfare, 32, 575-601, 2009.
15. S. Nitzan. More on the preservation of preference proximity and anonymous social choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 187-190, 1989.
16. G. Pigozzi. Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgement aggregation. Synthese, 152, 285-298, 2006.