Unemployment on the Agenda: A panel study of Agenda-Setting Effects During the 2006 Swedish national election campaign

Journal of Communication

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 182-203

  Shehata, Adam ^a  

^a MID SWEDEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTION; EMPLOYMENT GENERATION; MASS MEDIA; UNEMPLOYMENT; VOTING BEHAVIOR;

SWEDEN;

EID: 77950237390     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01475.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Asp K. Rättvisa nyhetsmedier. Partiskheten under 2006 års medievalrörelse 2006, Göteborg, JMG/Göteborgs universitet
2. Bartels L M. Three virtues of panel data for the analysis of campaign effects. Capturing campaign effects 2006, Brady H EJohnston R. In, (Eds.), Ann Arbor, MI, The University of Michigan Press
3. Benton M, Frazier J P. The agenda-setting function of the mass media at three levels of " information holding." Communication Research 1976, 3:261-274.
4. Bennett L W, Entman R M. Mediated politics: An introduction. Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy 2001, Bennett L W, Entman R M. In, (Eds.), Cambridge, U.K., Cambridge University Press
5. Blumler J, Gurevitch M. Rethinking the study of political communication. Mass media and society 2005, Blumler J, Gurevitch M. In, (Eds.), London, Hodder Arnold
6. Blumler J, Kavanagh D. The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication 1999, 16:209-230.
7. Brady H E, Johnston R, Sides J. The study of political campaigns. Capturing campaign effects 2006, Brady H E, Johnston R, In, (Eds.), Ann Arbor, MI, The University of Michigan Press
8. Campbell D T, Stanley J C. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research 1966, Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company
9. Converse P E. Information flow and the stability of partisan attitudes. The Public Opinion Quarterly 1962, 26(4):578-599.
10. Entman R. Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 1993, 43:51-58.
11. Finkel S E. Causal analysis with panel data 1995, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage
12. Gandy O H. Beyond agenda setting: Information subsidies and public policy 1982, Norwood, NJ, Ablex
13. Ghanem S. Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting. Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory 1997, McCombs MShaw DWeaver D. In, (Eds.), Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum.
14. Hallin D. The passing of the " high modernism" of American journalism revisited. Political Communication Report 2006, 16(1). http://frank.mtsu. edu/∼pcr/1601_2005_winter/commentary_hallin.htm, Retrieved January, 2010, from
15. Hill D B. Viewer characteristics and agenda-setting by television news. Public Opinion Quarterly 1985, 49:340-350.
16. Iyengar S, Kinder D R. News that matters: Television and American opinion 1987, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
17. Iyengar S, Adam S. News coverage of the gulf crisis and public opinion: A study of agenda-setting, priming and framing. Taken by storm: The media, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy in the Gulf War 1994, Paletz D L, Bennett L W. In, (Eds.), Chicago, University of Chicago Press
18. Johansson B. Nyheter mitt ibland oss. Kommunala nyheter, personlig erfarenhet och lokal opinionsbildning 1998, Göteborg, Institutionen för Journalistik och Masskommunikation, Göteborgs Universitet
19. Kiousis S, Bantimaroudis P, Ban H. Candidate image attributes. Experiments on the substantive dimension of second level agenda setting. Communication Research 1999, 26:414-428.
20. Lee J K. The effect of the Internet on homogeneity of the media agenda: A test of the fragmentation thesis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 2007, 84(4):745-760.
21. Maher M. Framing: An emerging paradigm or a phase of agenda setting? Framing public life. Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world 2003, Reese S DGandy O HGrant A E. In, (Eds.), Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum
22. McClure R D, Patterson T E. Setting the political agenda: Print vs. network news. Journal of Communication 1976, 26(1):23-28.
23. McCombs M, Shaw D. The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 1972, 36:176-187.
24. McCombs M, Lopez-Escobar E, Llamas J P. Setting the agenda of attributes in the 1996 Spanish general election. Journal of Communication 2000, 50:77-92.
25. McCombs M, Ghanem S I. The convergence of agenda setting and framing. Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world 2003, Reese S D, Gandy O HGrant A E. In, (Eds.), Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum
26. McCombs M, Kim K. News story descriptions and the public's opinions of political candidates. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 2007, 84:299-314.
27. McCombs M. Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion 2004, Cambridge, MA, Polity Press
28. McLeod J, Becker L B, Byrnes J E. Another look at the agenda-setting function of the press. Communication Research 1974, 1:131-165.
29. Menard S. Longitudinal research 2002, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage
30. Norris P. The virtuous circle: Political communication in post-industrial societies 2000, New York, Cambridge University Press
31. Reese S D, Danielian L H. Intermedia influence and the drug issue: Converging on cocaine. Communication campaigns about drugs: Government, media, and the public 1987, Shoemaker P, In, (Ed.), Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum
32. Rosenberg M. The logic of survey analysis 1968, New York, Basic Books
33. Scheufele D A. Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication 1999, 49(4):103-122.
34. Schoenbach K. Agenda-setting effects of print and television in West Germany. Agenda setting: Readings on media, public opinion, and policymaking 1991, Protess D LMcCombs M. In, (Eds.), Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum
35. Schoenbach K, De Waal E, Lauf E. Research note: Online and print newspapers. Their impact on the extent of the perceived public agenda. European Journal of Communication 2005, 20(2):245-258.
36. Schoenbach K, Lauf E. The " trap" effect of television and its competitors. Communication Research 2002, 29(5):564-583.
37. Schoenbach K, Lauf E. Another look at the " trap" effect of television-and beyond. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2004, 16(2):169-182.
38. Sheafer T, Weimann G. Agenda building, agenda setting, priming, individual voting intentions, and the aggregate results: An analysis of four Israeli elections. Journal of Communication 2005, 55:347-365.
39. Stanyer J. Modern political communication 2007, Cambridge, MA, Polity
40. Takeshita T. Current critical problems in agenda-setting research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2005, 18:275-296.
41. Taris T. A primer in longitudinal analysis 2000, London, Sage
42. Wanta W, Ghanem S. Effects of agenda setting. Mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis 2007, Preiss R W, Gayle B MBurell NAllen MBryant J. In, (Eds.), Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum
43. Weaver D. Political issues and voter need for orientation. The emergence of American political issues: The agenda-setting function of the press 1977, Shaw DMcCombs M. In, (Eds.), St. Paul, MN, West
44. Weaver D. Media agenda-setting and elections: 1970s-1990s. Political communication research: Approaches, studies, assessments, vol 2. 1996, Paletz D L. In, (Ed.), Norwood, NJ, Ablex
45. Willnat L. Agenda setting and priming: Conceptual links and differences. Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory 1997, McCombs MShaw DWeaver D. In, (Eds.), Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum.
46. Zaller J. The nature and origins of mass opinion 1992, Cambridge, U.K., Cambridge University Press
47. Zhu J H, Boroson W. Susceptibility to agenda setting: A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of individual differences. Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory 1997, McCombs M, Shaw DWeaver D. In, (Eds.), Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum.