Dimensions that shape teacher-scientist collaborations for teacher enhancement

Science Education

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 734-761

  Drayton, Brian ^a   Falk, Joni ^a  

^a TERC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745960745     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: 1098237X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20138     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Anderson, N. D. (1993). SCI-LINK: An innovative project linking research scientists and science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 4(2), 44-50.
2. Ball, D. L. (2002). What mathematics knowledge is needed for teaching mathematics? Remarks to the Secretary's Summit on Mathematics, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C., February 6, 2003. Available at http://www.ed.gov/inits/mathscience/ball.html.
3. Berkowitz, A. (1997). A simple framework for considering the benefits of student-scientist partnerships. In TERC and Concord Consortium (Eds.), National conference on student & scientist partnerships: Conference report. Cambridge, MA: TERC.
4. Butler, D., & Coppola, R. K. (1997). GLOBE. In TERC & Concord Consortium (Eds.), National conference on student and scientist partnerships: Conference report (pp. 69-70). Cambridge, MA: TERC.
5. Caton, E. C. B., & Brown, F. (2000). Building teacher - scientist partnerships: Teaching about energy through inquiry. School Science and Mathematics, 100(1), 7-15.
6. Doster, E., Jackson, D. F., & Smith, D. W. (1997). Modeling pedagogical content knowledge in physical science for prospective middle school teachers: problems and possibilities. Teacher Education Quarterly, 24(4), 51-65.
7. Dow, P. (1991). Schoolhouse politics: Lessons from the Sputnik era. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Drayton, B. (1993). Reflections of a curriculum writer. Hands On!, 16.2 (Fall), 1993.
9. Drayton, B., & Falk, J. K. (2001). Tell-tale signs of the inquiry-oriented classroom. Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, 85(623), 24-34.
10. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
11. Driver, R. P., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-12.
12. Elementary Science Study. (1973). The elementary science study - A history. Newton, MA: Educational Development Center, Inc.
13. Falk, J. K., & Drayton, B. (1997). Dynamics of the relationships between teachers and scientists in an innovative mentorship collaboration. Paper presented to American Educational Rresearch Association, March 1997.
14. Falk, J. K., & Drayton, B. (1998a). Before the innovation hits the classroom: Altering teachers' self-image as an element of teacher enhancement. Paper presented to AERA annual meeting 1998.
15. Falk, J. K., & Drayton, B. (1998b). Many futures: Mentoring middle school girls. Hands On!, 21(3), 24-28.
16. Falk, J., Drayton, B., Crawford, C., & Obuchowski, J. (1999). Eyes to the future: A multi-age mentoring program for girls. Leadership and New Technologies Perspectives, issue 8, April 1999.
17. Fedock, P. M., Zambo, R., & Cobern, W. W. (1996). The professional development of college science professors as science teacher educators. Science Education, 80(1), 5-19.
18. Fetters, M. K., Czerniak, C. M., Fish, L., & Shawberry, J. (2002). Confronting, challenging, and changing teachers' beliefs: Implications from a local systemic change professional development program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(2), 101-130.
19. Haakonsen, H., Tomala, G., Stone, A. H., & Hageman, S. (1993). Enhancing teaching excellence through a scientist - science teacher collaborative process. Journal of Science Teacher Education 4(4), 129-136.
20. Hargreaves, A. (1995). Development and desire: A post-modern perspective. In T. R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 9-34). New York: Teachers College Press.
21. Harlen, W. (2000). Teaching, learning, and assessing science 5-12. London: Paul Chapman.
22. Hawkins, I., & Battle, R. (1994). Science-on line: Partnership approach for the creation of Internet-based classroom resources. University of California, Berkeley: Center for Extreme Ultraviolet Astrophysics and Space Sciences Laboratory.
23. Herwitz, S. R., & Guerra, M. (1996). Perspectives, partnerships, and values in science education: A university and public elementary school collaboration. Science Education, 80(1), 21-34.
24. Huberman, M. (1993). The model of the independent artisan in teachers' professional relations. In J. W. Little & M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), Teachers' work: Individuals, colleagues, contexts. New York: Teachers College Press.
25. Janovy, J. (1996). On becoming a biologist. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
26. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Layne, R. E., Hamos, J. E., & Hines, D. H. (2001). Institutionalizing the Worcester Pipeline Collaborative. Worcester, MA: The Worcester Pipeline Collaborative.
28. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Washington, D.C.: National Institute for Science Education.
29. Mason, C. L. (1989). Field-based collaboration and cooperation: vehicles for effective preparation of preservice science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 1(2), 38-40.
30. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Minstrell, J., & van Zee, E. (Eds.) (2000). Inquiry into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
32. Munby, H., Cunningham, M., & Lock, C. (2000). School science culture: A case study of barriers to developing professional knowledge. Science Education, 84, 192-211.
33. National Research Council (NRC). (1996a). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
34. National Research Council (NRC). (1996b). The role of scientists in the professional development of science teachers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
35. Norris, S. P. (1995). Learning to live with scientific expertise: Toward a theory of intellectual communalism for guiding science teaching. Science Education, 79(2), 201-217.
36. Pennypacker, C. (1997). Why do scientists want teachers and students to do real research? In TERC & Concord Consortium (Eds.), National conference on student & scientist partnerships: Conference report. Cambridge, MA, TERC.
37. Pokress, S. C., Falk, J., & Drayton, B. (2003). Eyes to the future. Hands On!, 26(1), 12-16.
38. Romney, E., & M. J. Neuendorffer (1973). The Elementary Science Study: A history. Newton, MA: Education Development Center.
39. Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Scientists in the classroom: the cold war reconstruction of American science education. New York: Palgrave.
40. Ruopp, R., Gal, S., Drayton, B., & Pfister. M. (1993). Labnet: Toward a community of practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1): 1-22.
42. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Sussman, A. (1993). Science education partnerships: manual for scientists and K-12 teachers. San Francisco, CA: University of San Francisco.
45. TERC & Concord Consortium. (1997). National conference on student and scientist partnerships: Conference report. Cambridge, MA: TERC.
46. TERC. (1997). Teacher change through collaboration with scientists. Cambridge, MA: TERC.
47. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Wier, E. A. (1991). Scientists and elementary teachers: Partners in science teaching. Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Lake Geneva, WI, April 1991.
49. Wilson, J. (1997). Retired scientists are TOPS for science staff development. Journal of Staff Development, 18(4), 6-10.