Functional evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo) of morphological novelties in plants

Journal of Systematics and Evolution

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 94-101

  Zhang, Jisi ^a   Tian, Ying ^a   Wang, Li ^a   He, Chaoying ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Development; Evolution; Functional evo devo; Heterochrony; Heterotopy; Morphological novelty

Indexed keywords

MAGNOLIOPHYTA; SOLANACEAE;

EID: 77949969439     PISSN: 16744918     EISSN: 17596831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1759-6831.2010.00066.x     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Baxter C, Costa M, Coen E. 2007. Diversification and co-option of RAD-like genes in the evolution of floral asymmetry. The Plant Journal 52: 105-113.
2. Bharathan G, Goliber TE, Moore C, Kessler S, Pham T, Sinha NR. 2002. Homologies in leaf form inferred from KNOXI gene expression during development. Science 296: 1858-1860.
3. Boswell RE, Prout ME, Steichen JC. 1991. Mutations in a newly identified Drosophila melanogaster gene, mago nashi, disrupt germ cell formation and result in the formation of mirror-image symmetrical double abdomen embryos. Development 113: 373-384.
4. Broholm SK, Tähtiharju S, Laitinen RAE, Albert VA, Teeri TH, Elomaa P. 2008. A TCP domain transcription factor controls flower type specification along the radial axis of the Gerbera (Asteraceae) inflorescence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105: 9117-9122.
5. Busch A, Zachgo S. 2007. Control of corolla symmetry in the Brassicaceae Iberis amara. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104: 16714-16719.
6. Carroll SB. 2008. Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell 134: 25-36.
7. Carroll SB, Grenier JK, Weatherbee SD. 2001. From DNA to diversity: molecular genetics and the evolution of animal design. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Science. 149-171.
8. Coen ES, Meyerowitz EM. 1991. The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353: 31-37.
9. Cong B, Barrero LS, Tanksley SD. 2008. Regulatory change in YABBY-like transcription factor led to evolution of extreme fruit size during tomato domestication. Nature Genetics 40: 800-804.
10. Cong B, Liu J, Tanksley SD. 2002. Natural alleles at a tomato fruit size quantitative trait locus differ by heterochronic regulatory mutations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99: 13606-13611.
11. Corley S, Carpenter R, Copsey L, Coen E. 2005. Floral asymmetry involves an interplay between TCP and MYB transcription factors in Antirrhinum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102: 5068-5073.
12. Cubas P, Vincent C, Coen E. 1999. An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature 401: 157-161.
13. D'Arcy WG. 1991. The Solanaceae since 1976, with a review of its biogeography. In: Hawkes JG, Lester RN, Nee M, Estrada N eds. Solanaceae III: taxonomy, chemistry, evolution. Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. 75-137.
14. Darwin CD. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London: John Murray.
15. Davies B, Di Rosa A, Eneva T, Saedler H, Sommer H. 1996. Alteration of tobacco floral organ identity by expression of combinations of Antirrhinum MADS-box genes. The Plant Journal 10: 663-677.
16. Doebley J, Lukens L. 1998. Transcriptional regulators and the evolution of plant form. The Plant Cell 10: 1075-1082.
17. Doganlar S, Frary A, Daunay MC, Lester RN, Tanksley SD. 2002. Conservation of gene function in the Solanaceae as revealed by comparative mapping of domestication traits in eggplant. Genetics 161: 1713-1726.
18. Donoghue MJ, Ree R, Baum DA. 1998. Phylogeny and the evolution of flower symmetry in Asteridae. Trends in Plant Science 3: 311-317.
19. Frary A, Nesbitt TC, Grandillo S, Knaap E, Cong B, Liu J, Meller J, Elber R, Alpert KB, Tanksley SD. 2000. fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289: 85-88.
20. Galego L, Almeida J. 2002. Role of DIVARICATA in the control of dorsoventral asymmetry in Antirrhinum flowers. Genes and Development 16: 880-891.
21. Gao Q, Tao J-H, Yan D, Wang Y-Z. 2008. Expression differentiation of CYC-like floral symmetry genes correlated with their protein sequence divergence in Chirita heterotricha (Gesneriaceae). Development Genes and Evolution 218: 341-351.
22. Goodman CS, Coughlin BC. 2000. The evolution of evo-devo biology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 97: 4424-4425.
23. Gould SJ. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
24. Harrison J, Möller M, Langdale J, Cronk Q, Hudson A. 2005. The role of KNOX genes in the evolution of morphological novelty in Streptocarpus. The Plant Cell 17: 430-443.
25. He CY, Saedler H. 2005. Heterotopic expression of MPF2 is the key to the evolution of the Chinese lantern of Physalis, a morphological novelty in Solanaceae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102: 5779-5784.
26. He CY, Saedler H. 2007. Hormonal control of the inflated calyx syndrome, a morphological novelty, in Physalis. The Plant Journal 49: 935-946.
27. He CY, Münster T, Saedler H. 2004. On the origin of floral morphological novelties. FEBS Letters 567: 147-151.
28. He CY, Sommer H, Grosardt B, Huijser P, Saedler H. 2007. PFMAGO, a MAGO NASHI-like factor, interacts with the MADS-domain protein MPF2 from Physalis floridana. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1229-1241.
29. Hileman LC, Kramer EM, Baum DA. 2003. Differential regulation of symmetry genes and the evolution of floral morphologies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100: 12814-12819.
30. Hu JY, Saedler H. 2007. Evolution of the inflated calyx syndrome in Solanaceae. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 2443-2453.
31. Irish V, Litt A. 2005. Flower development and evolution: gene duplication, diversification and redeployment. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 15: 454-460.
32. Jeong S, Rebeiz M, Andolfatto P, Werner T, True J, Carroll SB. 2008. The evolution of gene regulation underlies a morphological difference between two Drosophila sister species. Cell 132: 783-793.
33. Kanno A, Saeki H, Kameya T, Saedler H, Theissen G. 2003. Heterotopic expression of class B floral homeotic genes supports a modified ABC model for tulip (Tulipa gesneriana). Plant Molecular Biololgy 52: 831-841.
34. Keys DN, Lewis DL, Selegue JE, Pearson BJ, Goodrich LV, Johnson RL, Gates J, Scott MP, Carroll SB. 1999. Recruitment of a hedgehog regulatory circuit in butterfly eyespot evolution. Science 283: 532-534.
35. Khan MR, Hu J, Riss S, He CY, Saedler H. 2009. MPF2-like-A MADS-box genes control the inflated calyx syndrome in Withania (Solanaceae): roles of Darwinian's selection. Molecular Biololgy and Evolution 26: 2463-2473.
36. Kim M, Cui M-L, Cubas P, Gillies A, Lee K, Chapman MA, Abbott RJ, Coen E. 2008. Regulatory genes control a key morphological and ecological trait transferred between species. Science 322: 1116-1119.
37. Kim S-Y, Yun P-Y, Fukuda T, Ochiai T, Yokoyama J, Kameya T, Kanno A. 2007. Expression of a DEFICIENS-like gene correlates with the differentiation between sepal and petal in the orchid, Habenaria radiata (Orchidaceae). Plant Science 172: 319-326.
38. Kitahara K, Matsumoto S. 2000. Rose MADS-box genes 'MASAKO C1 and D1' homologous to class C floral identity genes. Plant Science 151: 121-134.
39. Knapp S. 2002. Tobacco to tomatoes: a phylogenetic perspective on fruit diversity in the Solanaceae. Journal of Experimental Botany 53: 2001-2022.
40. Konishi S, Izawa T, Lin SY, Ebana K, Fukuta Y, Sasaki T, Yano M. 2006. An SNP caused loss of seed shattering during rice domestication. Science 312: 1392-1396.
41. Lee PN, Callaerts P, de Couet HG, Martindale MQ. 2003. Cephalopod Hox genes and the origin of morphological novelties. Nature 424: 1061-1065.
42. Li C, Zhou A, Sang T. 2006. Rice domestication by reducing shattering. Science 311: 1936-1939.
43. Luo D, Carpenter R, Copsey L, Vincent C, Clark J, Coen E. 1999. Control of organ asymmetry in flowers of Antirrhinum. Cell 99: 367-376.
44. Luo D, Carpenter R, Vincent C, Copsey L, Coen E. 1996. Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature 383: 794-799.
45. Ma W, Trusina A, El-Samad H, Lim WA, Tang C. 2009. Defining network topologies that can achieve biochemical adaptation. Cell 138: 760-773.
46. Newmark PA, Boswell RE. 1994. The mago nashi locus encodes an essential product required for germ plasm assembly in Drosophila. Development 120: 1303-1313.
47. Ochiai T, Nakamura T, Mashiko Y, Fukuda T, Yokoyama J, Kanno A, Kameya T. 2004. The differentiation of sepal and petal morphologies in Commelinaceae. Gene 343: 253-262.
48. Paran I, Van Der Knaap E. 2007. Genetic and molecular regulation of fruit and plant domestication traits in tomato and pepper. Journal of Experimental Botany 58: 3841-3852.
49. Raff RA, Parr BA, Parks AL, Wray GA. 1990. Heterochrony and other mechanisms of radical evolutionary change in early development. In: Nitecki MH ed. Evolutionary innovations. Chicago: The Univercity of Chicago Press. 71-98.
50. Song CF, Lin QB, Liang RH, Wang YZ. 2009. Expressions of ECE-CYC2 clade genes relating to abortion of both dorsal and ventral stamens in Opithandra (Gesneriaceae). BMC Evolutionary Biology 9: 244.
51. Theissen G, Saedler H. 2001. Plant biology: floral quartets. Nature 409: 469-471.
52. Tsaftaris AS, Polidoros AN, Pasentsis K, Kalivas A. 2006. Tepal formation and expression pattern of B-class paleoAP3-like MADS-box genes in crocus (Crocus sativus L.). Plant Science 170: 238-246.
53. Wake DB, Roth G. 1989. The linkage between ontogeny and phylogeney in the evolution of complex systems. In: Wake DB, Roth G eds. Complex organismal functions: integration and evolution in vertebrates. New York: Wiley. 361-377.
54. Wang H, Nussbaum-Wagler T, Li B, Zhao Q, Vigouroux Y, Faller M, Bomblies-Yant K, Lukens L, Doebley J. 2005. The origin of the naked grains of maize. Nature 436: 714-719.
55. Wang RL, Stec A, Hey J, Lukens L, Doebley J. 1999. The limits of selection during maize domestication. Nature 398: 236-239.
56. Wang Z, Luo Y, Li X, Wang L, Xu S, Yang J, Weng L, Sato S, Tabata S, Ambrose M, Rameau C, Feng X, Hu X, Luo D. 2008. Genetic control of floral zygomorphy in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105: 10414-10419.
57. Weigel D, Meyerowitz EM. 1994. The ABCs of floral homeotic genes. Cell 78: 203-209.
58. Xiao H, Jiang N, Schaffner E, Stockinger EJ, Van Der Knaap E. 2008. A retrotransposon-mediated gene duplication underlies morphological variation of tomato fruit. Science 319: 1527-1530.
59. Yanofsky MF, Ma H, Bowman JL, Drews GN, Feldmann KA, Meyerowitz EM. 1990. The protein encoded by the Arabidopsis homeotic gene agamous resembles transcription factors. Nature 346: 35-39.
60. Yuan Z, Gao S, Xue DW, Luo D, Li LT, Ding SY, Yao X, Wilson ZA, Qian Q, Zhang DB. 2009. RETARDED PALEA1 controls palea development and floral zygomorphy in rice. Plant Physiology 149: 235-244.
61. Zhang ZY, Lu AM, D'Arcy W. 1994. Przewalskia. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH eds. Flora of China. Beijing: Science Press; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. 17: 306.
62. Zhou XR, Wang YZ, Smith JF, Chen R. 2008. Altered expression patterns of TCP and MYB genes relating to the floral developmental transition from initial zygomorphy to actinomorphyin Bournea (Gesneriaceae). New Phytologist 178: 532-543.