Propensity vectors of low-ASA residue pairs in the distinction of protein interactions

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 589-602

  Liu, Qian ^a   Li, Jinyan ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Low asa residue pair; O ring surrounded region; Oringpv; Propensity vector

Indexed keywords

SOLVENT; PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STABILITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; SURFACE PROPERTY; VALIDATION PROCESS; ALGORITHM; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; METABOLISM; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

ALGORITHMS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEINS; ROC CURVE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 77949891473     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22583     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Tuncbag N, Kar G, Keskin O, Gursoy A, Nussinov R. A survey of available tools and web servers for analysis of protein-protein interactions and interfaces. Brief Bioinform 2009;10:217-232.
2. Nooren IM, Thornton JM. Diversity of protein-rotein interactions. EMBO J 2003;22:3486-3492.
3. Tsai CJ, Xu D, Nussinov R. Protein folding via binding and vice versa. Fold Des 1998;3:R71-R80.
4. Ofran Y, Rost B. Analysing six types of protein-protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 2003;325:377-387.
5. Mintseris J, Weng Z. Atomic contact vectors in protein-protein recognition. Proteins 2003;53:629-639.
6. Zhu H, Domingues FS, Sommer I, Lengauer T. NOXclass: prediction of protein-protein interaction types. BMC Bioinformatics 2006;7:27.
7. Bernauer J, Bahadur RPP, Rodier F, Janin J, Poupon A. DiMoVo: a voronoi tessellation-based method for discriminating crystallographic and biological protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics 2008;24:652-658.
8. Moont G, Gabb HA, Sternberg MJ. Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes. Proteins 1999;35:364-373.
9. Neuvirth H, Raz R, Schreiber G. ProMate: a structure based prediction program to identify the location of protein-protein binding sites. J Mol Biol 2004;338:181-199.
10. Bradford JR, Westhead DR. Improved prediction of protein-protein binding sites using a support vector machines approach. Bioinformatics 2005;21:1487-1494.
11. Valdar WSJ, Thornton JM. Conservation helps to identify biologically relevant crystal contacts. J Mol Biol 2001;313:399-416.
12. Young L, Jernigan RL, Covell DG. A role for surface hydrophobicity in protein-protein recognition. Protein Sci 1994;3:717-729. (Pubitemid 24139897)
13. Jones S, Thornton JM. Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sic USA. 1996;93:13-20.
14. Bahadur RP, Chakrabarti P, Rodier F, Janin J. Dissecting subunit interfaces in homodimeric proteins. Proteins 2003;53:708-719.
15. Bahadur RP, Chakrabarti P, Rodier F, Janin J. A dissection of specific and non-specific protein-protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 2004; 336:943-955.
16. Jones S, Thornton JM. Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches. J Mol Biol 1997;272:121-132. (Pubitemid 27395542)
17. De S, Krishnadev O, Srinivasan N, Rekha N. Interaction preferences across protein-protein interfaces of obligatory and non-obligatory components are different. BMC Struct Biol 2005;5:15. (Pubitemid 41316722)
18. Saha RP, Bahadur RP, Chakrabarti P. Interresidue contacts in proteins and protein-protein interfaces and their use in characterizing the homodimeric interface. J Proteome Res 2005;4:1600-1609.
19. Lukman S, Sim K, Li J, Chen YPP. Interacting amino acid preferences of 3d pattern pairs at the binding sites of transient and obligate protein complexes. APBC 2008;69-78.
20. Glaser F, Steinberg DM, Vakser IA, Ben-Tal N. Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 2001;43:89-102.
21. Ponstingl H, Henrick K, Thornton JM. Discriminating between homodimeric and monomeric proteins in the crystalline state. Proteins 2000;41:47-57.
22. Ponstingl H, Kabir T, Thornton JM. Automatic inference of protein quaternary structure from crystals. J Appl Crystallography 2003;36: 1116-1122.
23. Zhang C, Vasmatzis G, Cornette J, DeLisi C. Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. J Mol Biol. 1997;267:707-726.
24. Lo Conte L, Chothia C, Janin J. The atomic structure of proteinprotein recognition sites. J Mol Biol 1999;285:2177-2198.
25. Janin J, Miller S, Chothia C. Surface, subunit interfaces and interior of oligomeric proteins. J Mol Biol 1988;204:155-164.
26. Carago O, Argos P. Protein-protein crystal-packing contacts. Protein sci 1997;6:2261-2263.
27. Janin J, Rodier F. Protein-protein interaction at crystal contacts. Proteins 1995;23:580-587.
28. Janin J. Specific versus non-specific contacts in protein crystals. Nat Struct Biol 1997;4:973-974.
29. Liu S, Li Q, Lai L. A combinatorial score to distinguish biological and nonbiological protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 2006;64:68-78. (Pubitemid 43830986)
30. Block P, Paern J, Hullermeier E, Sanschagrin P, Sotriffer CA, Klebe G. Physicochemical descriptors to discriminate protein-protein interactions in permanent and transient complexes selected by means of machine learning algorithms. Proteins 2006;65:607-622. (Pubitemid 44583211)
31. Bernauer J, Azé J, Janin J, Poupon A. A new protein-protein docking scoring function based on interface residue properties. Bioinformatics 2007;5:555-562. (Pubitemid 46522588)
32. Bernauer J, Poupon A, Azé J, Janin J. A docking analysis of the statistical physics of protein-protein recognition. Phys Biol 2005;2:1-2.
33. Bogan AA, Thorn KS. Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 1998;280:1-9.
34. Thorn KS, Bogan AA. ASEdb: a database of alanine mutations and their effects on the free energy of binding in protein interactions. Bioinformatics 2001;17:284-285.
35. DeLano WL. Unraveling hot spots in binding interfaces: progress and challenges. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:14-20.
36. Moreira ISS, Fernandes PAA, Ramos MJJ. Hot spots: a review of the protein-protein interface determinant amino-acid residues. Proteins 2007;68:803-812.
37. Halperin I, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Protein-protein interactions: coupling of structurally conserved residues and of hot spots across interfaces. Implications for docking. Structure 2004;12:1027-1038.
38. Li J, Liu Q. 'Double water exclusion': a hypothesis refining the Oring theory for the hot spots at protein interfaces. Bioinformatics 2009;25:743-750.
39. Hubbard SJ, Thornton JM. 'NACCESS', computer program. Technical report, Department of Biochemistry Molecular Biology, University College London, 1993. http://www.bioinf.manchester.ac.uk/naccess/.
40. Pollastri G, Baldi P, Fariselli P, Casadio R. Prediction of coordination number and relative solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins 2002;47:142-153.
41. Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J. An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
42. Chang CC, Lin CJ. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines, 2001. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/iibsvm
43. Hsu C, Chang C, Lin C A. practical guide to support vector classification. Technical report, Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, 2003. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/ ~cjlin/libsvm
44. Rice JA. Mathematical statistics and data analysis. Duxbury Press, 2001.
45. Sobolev V, Wade RC, Vriend G, Edelman M. Molecular docking using surface complementarity. Proteins 1996;25:120-129.
46. Japkowiez N.Concept learning in the absence of counterexamples: an autoassociation-based approach to classification. PhD thesis, New Brunswick NJ: Director-Hanson, Jose and Director-Kulikowski, Casimir; 1999.