Analyzing the reliability of supreme court justices’ agenda-setting records

Justice System Journal

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 254-264

  Black, Ryan C ^a   Owens, Ryan J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949872412     PISSN: 0098261X     EISSN: 23277556     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0098261X.2009.10767936     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baird, V (2006). Answering the Call of the Court: How Justices and Litigants Set the Supreme Court Agenda. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press
2. Benesh, S. C., S. Brenner, and H. J. Spaeth (2002). “Aggressive Grants by Affirm-Minded Justices,” 30 American Politics Research 219
3. Black, R. C., and R. J. Owens (2009a). “Agenda-Setting in the Supreme Court: The Collision of Policy and Jurisprudence,” 71 Journal of Politics 1062
4. Black, R. C., and R. J. Owens (2009b). “Calling for the Views of the Solicitor General: A Strategic Analysis.” Unpublished manuscript. Previously presented at the 2008 meetings of the American Political Science Association
5. Black, R. C., and R. J. Owens (n.d.). “Join-3 Votes and Supreme Court Agenda Setting.” Unpublished manuscript
6. Boucher, R. L., Jr., and J. A. Segal (1995). “Supreme Court Justices as Strategic Decision Makers: Aggressive Grants and Defensive Denials on the Vinson Court,” 57 Journal of Politics 824
7. Brennan, W. J., Jr. (1973). “The National Court of Appeals: Another Dissent,” 40 University of Chicago Law Review 473
8. Brenner, S. (1997). “Error-Correction on the U.S. Supreme Court: A View from the Clerks’ Memos,” 34 Social Science Journal 1
9. Brenner, S. (1979). “The New Certiorari Game,” 41 Journal of Politics 649
10. Caldeira, G. A., and J. R. Wright (1988). “Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court,” 82 American Political Science Review 1109
11. Caldeira, G. A., J. R. Wright, and C. J. W Zorn (1999). “Sophisticated Voting and Gate-Keeping in the Supreme Court,” 15 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 549
12. Cohen, J. (1968). “Weighted Kappa: Nominal Scale Agreement with Provision for Scaled Disagreement or Partial Credit,” 70 Psychological Bulletin 213
13. Cohen, J. (1960). “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales,” 20 Educational and Psychological Measurement 37
14. Collins, E M., Jr. (2008). Friends of the Court: Interest Groups and Judicial Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press
15. Epstein, L., J. A. Segal, and H. J. Spaeth (2007). Digital Archive of the Papers of Harry A. Blackmun. http://epstein.law.northwestern.edu/research/BlackmunArchive/(last accessed June 23, 2009)
16. Howard, R. M., and J. A. Segal (2004). “A Preference for Deference? The Supreme Court and Judicial Review,” 57 Political Research Quarterly 131
17. Johnson, T R., E J. Wahlbeck, and J. F. Spriggs II (2006). “The Influence of Oral Argumentation Before the U.S. Supreme Court,” 100 American Political Science Review 99
18. Krol, J. F., and S. Brenner (1990). “Strategies in Certiorari Voting on the United States Supreme Court: A Reevaluation,” 43 Western Political Quarterly 335
19. Landis, J. R., and G. G. Koch (1977). “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data,” 33 Biometrics 159
20. Maltzman, F., and I. J. Wahlbeck (1996). “Inside the U.S. Supreme Court: The Reliability of the Justices’ Conference Records,” 58 Journal of Politics 528
21. Mauro, T (2009). “The Supreme Court Cert Pool: Sotomayor Joins It, Lawyers Attack It,” National Law Journal, September 22
22. O’Brien, D. M. (1997). “Join-3 Votes, the Rule of Four, the Cert. Pool, and the Supreme Court’s Shrinking Plenary Docket,” 13 Journal of Law and Politics 779
23. Owens, R. J. (2010). “The Separation of Powers and Supreme Court Agenda Setting,” 54:2 American Journal of Political Science forthcoming
24. Pacelle, R. (2003). Between Law and Politics: The Solicitor General and the Structuring of Race, Gender, and Reproductive Rights Litigation. College Station: Texas A&M University Press
25. Peppers, T. C. (2006). Courtiers of the Marble Palace: The Rise and Influence of the Supreme Court Law Clerk. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
26. Perry, H. W, Jr. (1991). Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United States Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
27. Provine, D. M. (1980). Case Selection in the United States Supreme Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
28. Spaeth, H. J. (2006). The Original United States Supreme Court Judicial Database 1953-2005 Terms. Michigan State University, East Lansing
29. Spriggs, J. F. II (1997). “Explaining Federal Bureaucratic Compliance with Supreme Court Opinions,” 50 Political Research Quarterly 567
30. Spriggs, J. F. II, and T G. Hansford (2000). “Measuring Legal Change: The Reliability and Validity of Shepard’s Citations,” 53 Political Research Quarterly 327
31. Spriggs, J. F. II, and P J. Wahlbeck (1997). “Amicus Curiae and the Role of Information at the Supreme Court,” 50 Political Research Quarterly 365
32. Stern, R. L., E. Gressman, S. M. Shapiro, and K. S. Geller (2002). Supreme Court Practice, 8th ed. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs
33. Wahlbeck, P J., and F. Maltzman (2005). “Opinion Assignment on the Rehnquist Court,” 89 Judicature 121
34. Ward, A., and D. L. Weiden (2006). Sorcerers’ Apprentices: 100 Years of Law Clerks at the United States Supreme Court. New York: New York University Press