A Preference for Deference? The Supreme Court and Judicial Review

Political Research Quarterly

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 131-143

  Howard, Robert M ^a   Segai, Jeffrey A ^b  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2142762684     PISSN: 10659129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/106591290405700111     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Allan, James. 1996. "Bills of Rights and judicial Power - A Liberal's Quandary." Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 16: 337
2. Ashwander v. TVA, 297 U.S. 288 (1936).
3. Balkin, Jack M. 2001. "Bush v. Gore and the Boundary Between Law and Politics." Yale Law Journal 110: 1450-58.
4. Baum, Lawrence. 1997 The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
5. Baum, Lawrence. 2001. The Supreme Court, 7th ed. Washington DC: CQ Press
6. Bergara, Mario, Barak Richman, and Pablo T. Spiller. 2003. Modeling Supreme Court Strategic Decision Making: The Congressional Constraint. Legislative Studies Quarterly 28: 247-80.
7. Bork, Robert. 1971. "Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems." Indiana Law Journal 47: 1
8. Boucher, Robert, and Jeffrey A. Segal. 1995. "Supreme Court Justices as Strategic Decision Makers: Offensive Grants and Defensive Denials on the Vinson Court." Journal of Politics 57: 824-37.
9. Brenner, Saul, and John F. Krol. 1989. Strategies in Certiorari Voting on the United States Supreme Court. Journal of Politics 51: 82841.
10. Bush v. Gore, 121 S. Ct. 525 (2000).
11. Caldeira, Gregory A., and Donald J. McCrone 1982. "Of Time and Judicial Activism: A Study of the U.S. Supreme Court, 1800 1973." In Stephen C. Halpern and Charles M. Lamb, Supreme Court Activism and Restraint. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
12. Commager, Henry Steele. 1943. Majority Rule and Minority Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Comisky, Michael. 1995. "Can Presidents Pack the Supreme Court?" Congress and the Presidency 22: 19-33.
14. Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. Choices Justices Make. Washington DC; Congressional Quarterly Press.
15. Epstein, Lee, and Joseph E Kobylka. 1992. The Supreme Court and Legal Change. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
16. Ferejohn, John, and Charles Shipan. 1990. "Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy." Journal of Law Economics and Organization 6: 1-20.
17. Franck, Matthew J. 1996. Against the Imperial Judiciary: The Supreme Court vs. the Sovereignty of the People. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
18. Eskridge, William N., Jr. 1991. " Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/President Civil Rights Game." California Law Review 79: 613-84.
19. George, Tracey E., and Lee Epstein. 1992. "On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making." American Political Science Review 86: 323-37.
20. Gibson, James L. 1978. "Judges' Role Orientations, Attitudes, and Decisions: An Interactive Model." American Political Science Review 72: 911-924.
21. _. 1983. "From Simplicity to Complexity: The Development of Theory in the Study of Judicial Behavior." Political Behavior 5:749.
22. Grossman, Joel B. 1962. "Role Playing and the Analysis of Judicial Behavior: The Case of Mr. Justice Frankfurter." Journal of Public Law 11: 285-309.
23. Halpern, Stephen C, and Charles M. Lamb, eds. 1982. Supreme Court Activism and Restraint. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books
24. Hand, Learned. 1959. The Bill of Sights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Kairys, David. 2001. "Bush v. Gore Blues." Jurist: The Legal Education Network, http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumnew23.htm
26. Kort, Fred. 1963. "Content Analysis of Judicial Opinions and Rules of Law." In Glendon Schubert, ed., Judicial Decision Making, Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
27. Lee v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, 505 U.S. 830 (1992).
28. Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905).
29. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803).
30. Marks, Brian A. 1988. A Model of Judicial Influence on Congressional Policymaking: Grove City College v. Bell. Working papers in Political Science, P-88-7, The Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
31. New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann. 285 U.S. 262, (1932).
32. Noonan, John T. 2002. Narrowing The Nation's Power: The Supreme Court Sides With The States. Berkeley: University of California Press
33. O'Connor, Karen. 1983. The Amicus Curiae Role of the U.S. Solicitor General in Supreme Court Litigation. Judicature 66: 25664.
34. Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112 (1970).
35. Regents of the University of Californiav. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978).
36. Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
37. Scigliano, Robert. 1971. The Supreme Court and the Presidency. New York: Free Press.
38. Segal, Jeffrey A. 1988. "Amicus Curiae Briefs by the Solicitor General During the Warren and Burger Courts." Western Political Quarterly 41: 13544.
39. _. 1999. "Supreme Court Deference to Congress: An Examination of the Marksist Model," pp. 237-53. In Cornell W Clayton and Howard Gillman, eds., Supreme Court Decision-Making; New Institutionalise Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Albert D. Cover. 1989. "Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices." American Political Science Review 83: 55765.
41. Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge.
42. _. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Segal, Jeffrey A., Lee Epstein, Charles M. Cameron, and Harold J. Spaeth. 1995." Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices Revisited." Journal of Politics 57: 812-23.
44. Songer, Donald R., and Susan Haire. 1992. "Integrating Alternative Approaches to the Study of Judicial Voting: Obscenity Cases in the U.S. Court of Appeals." American Journal of Political Science 36: 963-82.
45. Spaeth, Harold J. 1964. "The Judicial Restraint of Mr. Justice Frankfurter - Myth or Reality." Midwest Journal of Political Science 8: 22-38.
46. Spaeth Harold J., and Jeffrey A. Segal. 2000. "The U.S. Supreme Court Judicial Data Base: Providing New Insights into the Court." Judicature 83: 228-35.
47. Spaeth, Harold, and Stuart Teger. 1982. "Activism and Restraint: A Cloak for the Justices' Policy Preferences." In Stephen C. Halpern and Charles M. Lamb, eds., Supreme Court Activism and Restraint. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
48. Spiller, Pablo, and Rafael Gely. 1992. "Congressional Control or Judicial Independence: The Determinants of U.S. Supreme Court Labor Decisions: 1949/1987." Rand journal of Economics (23): 463.
49. Stern, Robert L, Eugene Gressman, and Stephen M. Shapiro. 1986. Supreme Court Practice, 6th ed. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.
50. Thayer, James Bradley 1893. "Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law." Harvard Law Review 7: 133.
51. Tushnet, Mark. 1999. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52. Ulmer, S. Sidney 1972. "The Decision to Grant Certiorari as an Indicator to Decision 'On the Merits'". Polity 4: 429.
53. U.S. v. Morrison, et al., 529 U.S.598 (2000).
54. Waldron, Jeremy. 1993. "A Rights-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights." Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13: 18.
55. _. 1998. "Judicial Review and the Conditions for Democracy." Journal of Political Philosophy 6: 335.
56. Wechsler, Herbert. 1961. "Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law." In Herbert Wechsler, ed., Principles, Politics, and Fundamental Law: Selected Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57. Zorn, Christopher. 2001. "Generalized Estimating Equation Models for Correlated Data: A Review with Applications." American Journal of Political Science 45: 470-90.