Goal generation from possibilistic beliefs based on trust and distrust

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5948 LNAI, Issue , 2010, Pages 35-50

  Da Costa Pereira, Célia ^a   Tettamanzi, Andrea G B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION FRAMEWORK; POSSIBILISTIC; RATIONAL AGENTS;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 77949856959     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-11355-0_3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20(1), 87-96 (1986)
2. Ben-Naim, J., Prade, H.: Evaluating trustworthiness from past performances: Interval-based approaches. In: Greco, S., Lukasiewicz, T. (eds.) SUM 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5291, pp. 33-46. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
3. Casali, A., Godo, L., Sierra, C.: Graded BDI models for agent architectures. In: Leite, J., Torroni, P. (eds.) CLIMA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3487, pp. 18-33. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
4. Castelfranchi, C.: Reasons: Belief support and goal dynamics. Mathware and Soft Computing 3, 233-247 (1996)
5. Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R., Pezzulo, G.: Trust in information sources as a source for trust: a fuzzy approach. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2003, pp. 89-96 (2003)
6. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Intention is choice with commitment. Artif. Intell. 42(2-3), 213-261 (1990)
7. da Costa Pereira, C., Tettamanzi, A.: Goal generation and adoption from partially trusted beliefs. In: Proceedings of ECAI 2008, pp. 453-457. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)
8. Dastani, M., Herzig, A., Hulstijn, J., Van Der Torre, L.: Inferring trust. In: Leite, J., Torroni, P. (eds.) CLIMA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3487, pp. 144-160. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
9. De Cock, M., da Silva, P.P.: A many valued representation and propagation of trust and distrust. In: Bloch, I., Petrosino, A., Tettamanzi, A.G.B. (eds.) WILF 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3849, pp. 114-120. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
10. Deschrijver, G., Kerre, E.E.:On the relationship between some extensions of fuzzy set theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 133(2), 227-235 (2003)
11. Dignum, F., Kinny, D.N., Sonenberg, E.A.: From desires, obligations and norms to goals. Cognitive Science Quarterly Journal 2(3-4), 407-427 (2002)
12. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility theory, probability theory and multiple-valued logics: A clarification. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 32(1-4), 35-66 (2001)
13. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: An introduction to bipolar representations of information and preference. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 23(8), 866-877 (2008)
14. Fullam, K.K., Barber, K.S.: Using policies for information valuation to justify beliefs. In: AAMAS 2004, pp. 404-411. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)
15. Griffiths, N.: A fuzzy approach to reasoning with trust, distrust and insufficient trust. In: Klusch, M., Rovatsos, M., Payne, T.R. (eds.) CIA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4149, pp. 360-374. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
16. Hansson, S.O.: Ten philosophical problems in belief revision. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(1), 37-49 (2003)
17. Jacquemet, N., Rullière, J.-L., Vialle, I.:Monitoring optimistic agents. Technical report, Université Paris 1 Sorbonne-Panthéon (2008)
18. Liau, C.-J.: Belief, information acquisition, and trust in multi-agent systems: a modal logic formulation. Artif. Intell. 149(1), 31-60 (2003)
19. McGuinness, B., Leggatt, A.: Information trust and distrust in a sensemaking task. In: Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium (2006)
20. McKnight, D.H., Chervany, N.L.: Trust and distrust definitions: One bite at a time. In: Proceedings of the workshop on Deception, Fraud, and Trust in Agent Societies, pp. 27-54. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
21. Intersex Society of North America, http://www.isna.org/
22. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.:Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In: KR 1991, pp. 473-484 (1991)
23. Thomason, R.H.: Desires and defaults: A framework for planning with inferred goals. In: Proceedings of KR 2000, pp. 702-713 (2000)
24. Türksen, I.B.: Interval valued fuzzy sets based on normal forms. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20(2), 191-210 (1986)
25. Wellman, M.P., Doyle, J.: Preferential semantics for goals. In: Proceedings of AAAI 1991, vol. 2, pp. 698-703 (1991)
26. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8, 338-353 (1965)
27. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1, 3-28 (1978)