Inferring trust

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3487 LNAI, Issue , 2005, Pages 144-160

  Dastani, Mehdi ^a   Herzig, Andreas ^b   Hulstijn, Joris ^c   Van Der Torre, Leendert ^d  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b IRIY   (France)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d CWI   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

BELIEF, INFORM AND TRUST (BIT); FORMALIZATION;

FORMAL LOGIC;

EID: 26844472231     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11533092_9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Tan, Y.H., Thoen, W.: Formal aspects of a generic model of trust for electronic commerce. In: 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'00). (2000) p. 6006
2. Liau, C.J.: Belief, information acquisition, and trust in multi-agent systems - a modal formulation. Artificial Intelligence 149 (2003) 31-60
3. Gasquet, O., Herzig, A.: From classical to normal modal logics. In Wansing, H., ed.: Proof Theory of Modal Logics, Volume 2 of Applied Logic Series. Kluwer (1996) 293-311
4. Kracht, M., Wolter, F.: Normal monomodal logics can simulate all others. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (1999) 99-138
5. Goffman, E.: Strategic interaction. University of Pennsylvania Press, Pennsylvania (1969)
6. Demolombe, R.: To trust information sources: a proposal for a modal logical framework. In Castelfranchi, C., Tan, Y.H., eds.: Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies. Kluwer (2001) 111-124
7. Demolombe, R., Jones, A.: On sentences of the kind "sentence 'p' is about topic t". In: Logic, language and reasoning: Essays in Honour of Dov Gabbay. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1999) 115-133
8. Herzig, A., Longin, D.: Belief dynamics in cooperative dialogues. Journal of Semantics 17 (2000) 91-118
9. Janin, D., Walukiewicz, I.: Automata for the modal mu-calculus and related results. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS'95), LNCS 969, Springer Verlag (1995) 552-562
10. Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M.: Questions. In Van Benthem, J., Ter Meulen, A., eds.: Handbook of Logic and Language. North-Holland, Elsevier (1996) 1055-1124
11. van Kuppevelt, J.: Discourse structure, topicality and questioning. Journal of Linguistics 31 (1995) 109-149
12. Horty, J.: Agency and Deontic Logic. Oxford University Press (2001)
13. Tan, Y.H., Thoen, W.: An outline of a trust model for electronic commerce, Applied Artificial Intelligence 14 (2000) 849-862
14. Mayer, R., Davis, J., Schoorman, F.: An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 20 (1995) 709-734
15. Gambetta, D.: Can we trust trust? In: Trust. Basil Blackwell, New York (1988) 213-237
16. Grosz, B., Sidner, C.: Attentions, intentions and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12 (1986) 175-204
17. Huibers, T.: An Axiomatic Theory for Information Retrieval. PhD thesis, Utrecht University (1996)
18. Burrows, M., Abadi, M., Needham, R.: A logic of authentication. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 8 (1990) 18-36
19. Foster, I., Kesselman, C., Tuecke, S.: The anatomy of the Grid: Enabling scalable virtual organizations.International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications 15 (2001) 200-222
20. Carbone, M., Nielsen, M., Sassone, V.: A formal model for trust in dynamic networks. In: International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM'03), IEEE (2003) 54-63
21. Jones, A., Firozabadi, B.S.: On the characterisation of a trusting agent - aspects of a formal approach. In Castelfranchi, C., Tan, Y., eds.: Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2001) 157-168
22. Blaze, M., Feigenbaum, J., Lacy, J.: Decentralized trust management. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. IEEE (1996) 164-173
23. Dellarocas, C.: The digitisation of word-of-mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science 49 (2004) 1407-1424