The controversy over electing judges and advocacy in political science

Justice System Journal

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 284-291

  Hall, Melinda Gann ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949816671     PISSN: 0098261X     EISSN: 23277556     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0098261X.2009.10767939     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. American Bar Association Commission on the 21st Century Judiciary (2003). Justice in Jeopardy. Chicago: American Bar Association
2. Bonneau, C. W. (2005). “Electoral Verdicts: Incumbent Defeats in State Supreme Court Elections,” 33 American Politics Research 818
3. Bonneau, C. W, and M. G. Hall (2009). In Defense of Judicial Elections. New York: Routledge
4. Brace, E, and M. G. Hall (2001). “‘Haves’ Versus ‘Have Nots’ in State Supreme Courts: Allocating Docket Space and Wins in Power Asymmetric Cases,” 35 Law and Society Review 393
5. Brace, E, and M. G. Hall (1997). “The Interplay of Preferences, Case Facts, Context, and Structure in the Politics of Judicial Choice,” 59 Journal of Politics 1206
6. Brace, E, M. G. Hall, and L. Langer (1999). “Judicial Choice and the Politics of Abortion: Institutions, Context, and the Autonomy of Courts,” 62 Albany Law Review 1265
7. Cann, D. M., and J. Yates (2008). “Homegrown Institutional Legitimacy: Assessing Citizens’ Diffuse Support for State Courts,” 36 American Politics Research 297
8. Choi, S. J., G. M. Gulati, and E. A. Posner (2007). “Professionals or Politicians: The Uncertain Empirical Case for an Elected Rather than Appointed Judiciary.” John M. Olin Law and Economics Working Paper No. 357 (2nd Series), University of Chicago
9. Dimino, M. R. (2004). “Judicial Elections Versus Merit Selection: The Futile Quest for a System of ‘Merit’ Selection,” 67 Albany Law Review 803
10. Dubois, E L. (1980). From Ballot to Bench: Judicial Elections and the Quest for Accountability. Austin: University of Texas Press
11. Epstein, L., and J. Segal (2005). Advice and Consent: The Politics of Judicial Appointments. New York: Oxford University Press
12. Gibson, J. L. (2009). “‘New Style’ Judicial Campaigns and the Legitimacy of State High Courts,” 71 Journal of Politics forthcoming
13. Hale, K., R. McNeal, and J. Pierceson (2008). “New Judicial Politics? Interest Groups in State Supreme Court Races.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 3-6
14. Hall, M. G. (2009). “On the Cataclysm of Judicial Elections and Other Popular Anti¬Democratic Myths.” Paper presented at the What’s Law Got to Do with It Conference, Indiana University School of Law, Bloomington
15. Hall, M. G. (2007a). “Voting in State Supreme Court Elections: Competition and Context as Democratic Incentives,” 69 Journal of Politics 1147
16. Hall, M. G. (2007b). “Competition as Accountability in State Supreme Court Elections.” In M.J. Streb (ed.), Running for Judge: The Rising Political, Financial, and Legal Stakes of Judicial Elections, pp. 165-85. New York: New York University Press
17. Hall, M. G. (2001a). “State Supreme Courts in American Democracy: Probing the Myths of Judicial Reform,” 95 American Political Science Review 315
18. Hall, M. G. (2001b). “Voluntary Retirements from State Supreme Courts: Assessing Democratic Pressures to Relinquish the Bench,” 63 Journal of Politics 1112
19. Hall, M. G. (1995). “Justices as Representatives: Elections and Judicial Politics in the American States,” 23 American Politics Quarterly 485
20. Hall, M. G. (1992). “Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting in State Supreme Courts,” 54 Journal of Politics 427
21. Hall, M. G. (1987). “Constituent Influence in State Supreme Courts: Conceptual Notes and a Case Study,” 49 Journal of Politics 1117
22. Hall, M. G., and C. W. Bonneau (2008). “Mobilizing Interest: The Effects of Money on Citizen Participation in State Supreme Court Elections,” 52 American Journal of Political Science 457
23. Hall, M. G., and C. W. Bonneau (2006). “Does Quality Matter? Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections,” 50 American Journal of Political Science 20
24. Hojnacki, M., and L. Baum (1992). “New Style’ Judicial Campaigns and Voters: Economic Issues and Union Members in Ohio,” 45 Western Political Quarterly 921
25. Hurwitz, M. S., and D. N. Lanier (2003). “Explaining Judicial Diversity: The Differential Ability of Women and Minorities to Attain Seats on State Supreme and Appellate Courts,” 3 State Politics and Policy Quarterly 329
26. Kelleher, C. A., and J. Wolak (2007). “Explaining Public Confidence in the Branches of State Government,” 60 Political Research Quarterly 707
27. Langer, L. (2002). Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts: A Comparative Study. Albany: State University of New York Press
28. National Center for State Courts (2002). Call to Action: Statement of the National Summit on Improving Judicial Selection. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts
29. Peters, C. S. (2009). “Canons of Ethics and Accountability in State Supreme Court Elections,” 9 State Politics and Policy Quarterly 24
30. Republican Party of Minnesota v. White (2002). 536 U.S. 765
31. Sample, J., L. Jones, and R. Weiss (2007). The New Politics of Judicial Elections 2006. Washington, DC: Justice at Stake
32. Sheldon, C. H., and L. S. Maule (1997). Choosing Justice: The Recruitment of State and Federal Judges. Pullman: Washington State University Press
33. Squire, E, and E. R. A. N. Smith (1988). “The Effect of Partisan Information on Voters in Nonpartisan Elections,” 50 Journal of Politics 169
34. Streb, M. J. (2007). “Partisan Involvement in Partisan and Nonpartisan Trial Court Elections.” In M. J. Streb (ed.), Running for Judge: The Rising Political, Financial, and Legal Stakes of Judicial Elections, pp. 96-114. New York: New York University Press
35. Streb, M. J., and B. Frederick (2009). “Conditions for Competition in Low-Information Elections: The Case of Intermediate Appellate Courts,” 62 Political Research Quarterly forthcoming
36. Tiede, L. B. (2006). “Judicial Independence: Often Cited, Rarely Understood,” 15 Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 129