From numbers to letters: Feedback regularization in visual word recognition

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1343-1355

  Molinaro, Nicola ^a,b   Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni ^a   Marìn Gutièrrez, Alejandro ^b   Carreiras, Manuel ^a,b,c,d  

^a BASQUE CENTER ON COGNITION   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

^c BASQUE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

ERPs; Letters; Numbers; SLORETA; TPCA; Visual word recognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PARIETAL LOBE; READING; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77949774490     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.037     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological) 1995, 57:289-300.
2. Bowers J.S. In defense of abstractionist theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2000, 7:83-99.
3. Bowers J.S., Michita Y. An investigation into the structure and acquisition of orthographic knowledge: Evidence from cross-script Kanji-Hiragana priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1998, 5:259-264.
4. Bowers J.S., Vigliocco G., Haan R. Orthographic, phonological, and articulatory contributions to masked letter and word priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1998, 24:1705-1719.
5. Carreiras M., Dunabeitia J.A., Molinaro N. Consonants and vowels contribute differently to visual word recognition: ERPs of relative position priming. Cerebral Cortex 2009, 19(11):2659-2670.
6. Carreiras M., Duñabeitia J.A., Perea M. READING WORDS, NUMB3R5 and $YMβOL$. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:454-455.
7. Carreiras M., Gillon-Dowens M., Vergara M., Perea M. Are vowels and consonants processed differently? ERP evidence with a delayed letter paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21:275-288.
8. Carreiras M., Vergara M., Perea M. ERP correlates of transposed-letter priming effects: The role of vowels vs. consonants. Psychophysiology 2009, 46:34-42.
9. Chauncey K., Holcomb P.J., Grainger J. Effects of stimulus font and size on masked repetition priming: An ERP investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:183-200.
10. Coltheart M. Disorders of reading and their implications for models of normal reading. Visible Language 1981, 3:245-286.
11. Cuffin B.N., Schomer D.L., Ives J.R., Blume H. Experimental tests of EEG source localization accuracy in spherical head models. Clinical Neurophysiology 2001, 112:46-51.
12. Dehaene S., Cohen L. Response to Carreiras et al: The role of visual similarity, feedforward, feedback and lateral pathways in reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:456-457.
13. Dehaene S., Cohen L., Sigman M., Vinckier F. The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9:335-341.
14. Dehaene S., Piazza M., Pinel P., Cohen L. Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2003, 20:487-506.
15. Duñabeitia J.A., Molinaro N., Laka I., Estévez A., Carreiras M. N250 effects for letter transpositions depend on lexicality: Casual or causal?. Neuroreport 2009, 20:391-397.
16. Duñabeitia J.A., Perea M., Carreiras M. Eye movements when reading words with $YMβOL$ and NUM83R5: There is a cost. Visual Cognition 2009, 17:617-631.
17. Eddy M., Schmid A., Holcomb P.J. Masked repetition priming and event-related brain potentials: A new approach for tracking the time-course of object perception. Psychophysiology 2006, 43:1-5.
18. Finkbeiner M., Coltheart M. Letter recognition: From perception to representation. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2009, 26:1-6.
19. Forster K.I., Mohan K., Hector J. The mechanics of masked priming. Masked priming: State of the art 2003, 3-37. Psychology Press, Hove, UK. S. Kinoshita, S.J. Lupker (Eds.).
20. Fuchs M., Kastner J., Wagner M., Hawes S., Ebersole J.S. A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model. Clinical Neurophysiology 2002, 113:702-712.
21. Glezer L.S., Jiang X., Riesenhuber M. Evidence for highly selective neuronal tuning to whole words in the " Visual Word Form Area" Neuron 2009, 62:199-204.
22. Grainger J., Kiyonaga K., Holcomb P.J. The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Psychological Science 2006, 17:1021-1026.
23. Grainger J., Granier J.P., Farioli F., Van Assche E., Van Heuven W. Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:865-884.
24. Grainger J., Holcomb P.J. Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistic Compass 2009, 3:128-156.
25. Grainger J., Jacobs A.M. A dual read-out model of word context effects in letter perception: Further investigations of the word superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:1158-1176.
26. Grainger J., Rey A., Dufau S. Letter perception: From pixels to pandemonium. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12:381-387.
27. Grainger J., Van Heuven W. Modeling letter position conding in printed word perception. The mental lexicon 2003, 1-24. Nova Science Publishers, New York. P. Bonin (Ed.).
28. Greenhouse S.W., Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 1959, 24:95-112.
29. Grossi G., Coch D. Automatic word form processing in masked priming: An ERP study. Psychophysiology 2005, 42:343-355.
30. Halpern C.H., Glosser G., Clark R., Gee J., Moore P., Dennis K., McMillan C., Colcher A., Grossman M. Dissociation of numbers and objects in corticobasal degeneration and semantic dementia. Neurology 2004, 62:1163-1169.
31. Hauk O., Patterson K., Woollams A., Watling L., Pulvermuller F., Rogers T.T. [Q:] When would you prefer a SOSSAGE to a SAUSAGE? [A:] At about 100 msec. ERP correlates of orthographic typicality and lexicality in written word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18:818-832.
32. Holcomb P.J., Grainger J. On the time-course of visual word recognition: An ERP investigation using masked repetition priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18:1631-1643.
33. Izard V., Dehaene-Lambertz G., Dehaene S. Distinct cerebral pathways for object identity and number in human infants. PLoS Biology 2008, 6:1-11.
34. Jacobs A.M., Grainger J. Automatic letter priming in an alphabetic decision task. Perception and Psychophysics 1991, 49:43-52.
35. Johnston J.C., McClelland J.L. Visual factors in word perception. Perception and Psychophysics 1973, 14:365-370.
36. Jordan T.R., Thomas S.M., Scott-Brown K.C. The illusory letters phenomenon: An illustration of graphemic restoration in visual word recognition. Perception 1999, 28:1413-1416.
37. Jurcak V., Tsuzuki D., Dan I. 10/20, 10/10, and 10/5 systems revisited: Their validity as relative head-surface-based positioning systems. NeuroImage 2007, 34:1600-1611.
38. Luck S. An introduction to the event-related potential technique 2005, The MIT Press, Boston.
39. Manly B.F.J. Randomization, bootstrap and monte carlo methods in biology 2007, Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, London. 3rd ed.
40. McCandliss B.D., Cohen L., Dehaene S. The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Science 2003, 7:293-299.
41. McClelland J.L. Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1976, 3:80-91.
42. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 1981, 88:375-407.
43. Molenberghs P., Mesulam M.M., Peeters R., Vandenberghe R.R.C. Remapping attentional priorities: Differential contribution of superior parietal lobule and intraparietal sulcus. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17:2703-2712.
44. Molholm S., Sehatpour P., Mehta A.D., Shpaner M., Gomez-Ramirez M., Ortigue S., Dyke J.P., Schwartz T.H., Foxe J.J. Audio-visual multisensory integration in superior parietal lobule revealed by human intracranial recordings. Journal of Neurophysiology 2006, 96:721-729.
45. Nichols T.E., Holmes A.P. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples. Human Brain Mapping 2002, 15:1-25.
46. Oldfield R. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
47. Pascual-Marqui R.D. Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): Technical details. Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology 2002, 24:5-12.
48. Perea M., Duñabeitia J.A., Carreiras M. R34D1NG W0RD5 W1TH NUMB3R5. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:237-241.
49. Perea M., Duñabeitia J.A., Pollatsek A., Carreiras M. Does the brain regularize digits and letters to the same extent?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62:1881-1888.
50. Peressotti F., Grainger J. The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception and Psychophysics 1999, 61:691-706.
51. Pesenti M., Thioux M., Seron X., De Volder A. Neuroanatomical substrate of Arabic number processing, numerical comparison and simple addition: A PET study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12:461-479.
52. Petit J.P., Midgley K.J., Holcomb P.J., Grainger J. On the time-course of letter perception: A masked priming ERP investigation. Psychonomics Bulletin and Review 2006, 13:674-681.
53. Polk T.A., Farah M.J. A simple common contexts explanation for the development of abstract letter identities. Neural Computation 1997, 9:1277-1289.
54. Polk T.A., Lacey H.P., Nelson J.K., Demiralp E., Newman L.I., Krauss D.A., Raheja A., Farah M.J. The development of abstract letter representations for reading: Evidence for the role of context. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2009, 26:70-90.
55. Pylkkänen L., Marantz A. Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:187-189.
56. Rayner K., Pollatsek A. The psychology of reading 1989, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
57. Reinke K., Fernandes M., Schwindt G., O'Craven K., Grady C.L. Functional specificity of the visual word form area: General activation for words and symbols but specific network activation for words. Brain and Language 2008, 104:180-189.
58. Rey A., Dufau S., Massol S., Grainger J. Testing computational models of letter perception with item-level event-related potentials. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2009, 26:7-22.
59. Sebastiàn-Gallés, N., Martì, A., Carreiras, M., & Cuetos, F. (2000). LEXESP: Una base de datos informatizada del español. Barcelona: Ed. Universitat de Barcelona.
60. Sereno S.C., Rayner K., Posner M.I. Establishing a time-line of word recognition: Evidence from eye-movements and event-related potentials. Neuroreport 1998, 9:2195-2200.
61. Thompson G.B. The long learning route to abstract letter units. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2009, 26:50-69.
62. Wastell D.G. On the correlated nature of evoked brain activity: Biophysical and statistical considerations. Biological Psychology 1981, 13:51-69.
63. Whitney C. How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomics Bulletin and Review 2001, 8:221-243.