Comparisons of Means Using Exploratory and Confirmatory Approaches

Psychological Methods

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 69-86

  Kuiper, Rebecca M ^a   Hoijtink, Herbert ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

analysis of variance; confirmation; exploration; hypothesis testing; model selection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICS;

CAUSALITY; HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOLOGY;

EID: 77949600989     PISSN: 1082989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0018720     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anraku K. An information criterion for parameters under a simple order restriction. Biometrika 86 (1999) 141-152
2. Chen M., and Sungduk K. The Bayes factor versus other model selection criteria for the selection of constrained models. In: Hoijtink H., Klugkist I., and Boelen P.A. (Eds). Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses (2008), Springer, New York, NY 155-180
3. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112 (1992) 155-159
4. Dayton C.M. Information criteria for paired-comparison problem. American Statistician 52 (1998) 144-151
5. Dayton C.M. SUBSET: Best subsets using information criteria. Journal of Statistical Software 6 (2001) 1-10
6. Dayton C.M. Information criteria for pairwise comparisons. Psychological Methods 8 (2003) 61-71
7. Gupta V.K., Turban D.B., and Bhawe N.M. The effect of gender stereotype activation on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology 93 (2008) 1053-1061
8. Hasel L.E., and Kassin S.M. On the presumption of evidentiary independence: Can confessions corrupt eyewitness identifications?. Psychological Science 20 (2009) 122-126
9. Hoijtink H., Huntjens R., Reijntjes A., Kuiper R., and Boelen P.A. An evaluation of Bayesian inequality constrained analysis of variance. In: Hoijtink H., Klugkist I., and Boelen P.A. (Eds). Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses (2008), Springer, New York, NY 85-108
10. Hox J.J. Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2002), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
11. Johnson V.E. Bayes factors based on test statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 67 (2005) 689-701
12. Klugkist I. Encompassing prior based model selection for inequality constrained analysis of variance. In: Hoijtink H., Klugkist I., and Boelen P.A. (Eds). Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses (2008), Springer, New York, NY 53-83
13. Klugkist I., Kato B., and Hoijtink H. Bayesian model selection using encompassing priors. Statistica Neerlandica 59 (2005) 57-69
14. Klugkist I., Laudy O., and Hoijtink H. Inequality constrained analysis of variance: A Bayesian approach. Psychological Methods 10 (2005) 477-493
15. Kramer C.Y. Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics 12 (1956) 307-310
16. Kramer C.Y. Extension of multiple range tests to group correlated adjusted means. Biometrics 13 (1957) 13-18
17. Lievens F., and Sanchez J.I. Can training improve the quality of inferences made by raters in competence modeling? A quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (2007) 812-819
18. Lucas J.W. Status processes and the institutionalization of women as leaders. American Sociological Review 68 (2003) 464-480
19. Martin, S. A., Toothaker, L. E., & Nixon, S. J. (1989, April). A Monte Carlo comparison of multiple comparison procedures under optimal and nonoptimal conditions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Psychological Association, Houston, TX.
20. Miller Jr. R.G. Beyond ANOVA: Basics of applied statistics (1986), Wiley, New York, NY
21. Neath A.A., and Cavanaugh J.E. A Bayesian approach to the multiple comparisons problem. Journal of Data Science 4 (2006) 131-146
22. Palmer E.J., and Gough K. Childhood experiences of parenting and causal attributions for criminal behavior among young offenders and non-offenders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 37 (2007) 790-806
23. Ramsey P.H. Comparison of closed testing procedures for pairwise testing of means. Psychological Methods 7 (2002) 504-523
24. Rossell D., Baladandayuthapani V., and Johnson V.E. Bayes factors based on test statistics under order restrictions. In: Hoijtink H., Klugkist I., and Boelen P.A. (Eds). Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses (2008), Springer, New York, NY 111-129
25. Shaffer J.P. Comparison of means: An F test followed by a modified multiple range procedure. Journal of Educational Statistics 4 (1979) 14-23
26. Silvapulle M.J., and Sen P.K. Constrained statistical inference (2005), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
27. Stevens J. Intermediate statistics: A modern approach (1999), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
28. Toothaker L.E. Multiple comparison procedures (1993), Sage, Newbury Park, CA
29. Tukey, J. W. (1953). The problem of multiple comparisons. Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University.
30. Welsch R.E. Stepwise multiple comparison procedures. Journal of the American Statistical Association 72 (1977) 566-575
31. Wiener R.L., Holtje M., Winter R.J., Cantone J.A., and Gross K. Consumer credit card use: The roles of creditor disclosure and anticipated emotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 13 (2007) 32-46