Modulation of spatial Stroop by object-based attention but not by space-based attention

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 516-530

  Luo, Chunming ^a   Lupiáñez, Juan ^b   Funes, María Jesús ^b   Fu, Xiaolan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^c INSTITUTE OF PSYCHOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Object based attention; Space based attention; Spatial code; Spatial Stroop effect

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; STROOP TEST; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; STROOP TEST; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 77949556239     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210903004638     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abrams, R. A., & Law, M. B. (2000). Object-based visual attention with endogenous orienting. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 818-833.
2. Chica, A. B., Lupiáñez, J., & Bartolomeo, P. (2006). Dissociating inhibition of return from endogenous orienting of spatial attention: Evidence from detection and discrimination tasks. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(7), 1015-1034.
3. Danziger, S., & Kingstone, A. (1999). Unmasking the inhibition of return phenomenon. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1024-1037.
4. Danziger, S., Kingstone, A., & Ward, R. (2001). Environmentally defined frames of reference: Their sensitivity to spatial cues and attention, and their time course. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 494-503.
5. Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177.
6. Funes, M. J., & Lupiáñez, J. (2003). La teoría atencional de Posner: Una tarea para medir las funciones atencio-nales de orientación, alerta y control cognitivo y la interacción entre ellas [Posner'stheoryofattention: A task to measure the attentional functions of orienting, alerting and cognitive control and the interactions between them]. Psicothema, 15, 260-266.
7. Funes, M. J., Lupiáñez, J., & Milliken, B. (2005). The role of spatial attention and other processes on the magnitude and time course of cueing effects. Cognitive Processing-International Quarterly of Cognitive Science, 6, 98-116.
8. Funes, M. J., Lupiáñez, J, & Milliken, B. (2007). Separate mechanisms recruited by exogenous and endogenous spatial cues: Evidence from a spatial Stroop paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(2), 348-262.
9. Funes, M. J., Lupiáñez, J, & Milliken, B. (2008). The modulation of exogenous spatial cueing on spatial Stroop interference: Evidence of a set for "cuetarget event segregation". Psicológica, 29, 65-95.
10. Goldsmith, M., & Yeari, M. (2003). Modulation of object-based attention by spatial focus under endogenous and exogenous orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(5), 897-918.
11. Hommel, B. (1993a). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280-290.
12. Hommel, B. (1993b). The role of attention for the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 55, 208-222.
13. Ivanoff, J., Klein, R. M., & Lupiáñez, J. (2002). Inhibition of return interacts with the Simon effect: An omnibus analysis and its implications. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 318-327.
14. Jonides, J., & Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 346-354.
15. Juola, J. F., Koshino, H., & Warner, C. B. (1995). Tradeoffs between attentional effects of spatial cues and abrupt onsets. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 333-342.
16. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
17. Klein, R.M., & Shore, D.I. (2000). Relations among modes of visual orienting. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention & Performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 195-208). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
18. Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1994). Processing of an irrelevant location as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 286-298.
19. Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon effect and congruency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174-207.
20. Lupiáñez, J., & Funes, M. J. (2005). Peripheral spatial cues modulate spatial Stroop interference: Analyzing the "locus" of the cueing modulation. European Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 727-752.
21. Lupiáñez, J., & Milliken, B. (1999). Inhibition of return and the attentional set for integrating versus differentiating information. The Journal of General Psychology, 126(4), 392-418.
22. Lupiáñez, J., Milliken, B., Solano, C., Weaver, B., & Tipper, S. P. (2001). On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54(3), 753-773.
23. Macquistan, A. D. (1997). Object-based allocation of visual attention in response to exogenous, but not endogenous, spatial precues. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 512-515.
24. O'Leary, M., & Barber, P. (1993).Interferenceeffectsinthe Stroop and Simon paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 830-844.
25. Prinzmetal, W., McCool, C., & Park, S. (2005). Attention: Reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(1), 73-92.
26. Proctor, R. W., Lu, C. H., & Van Zandt, T. (1992). Enhancement of the Simon effect by response precuing. Acta Psychologica, 81, 53-74.
27. Rubichi, S., Nicoletti, R., Iani, C., & Umilta, C. (1997). The Simon effect occurs in relation to the direction of an attention shift. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 1353-1364.
28. Rubichi, S., Vu, K.-P. L., Nicoletti, R., & Proctor, R. W. (2006). Spatial coding in two dimensions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 201-216.
29. Shomstein, S., & Yantis, S. (2002). Object-based attention: Sensory modulation or priority setting? Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 41-51.
30. Stoffer, T. H. (1991). Attentional focusing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research, 53, 127-135.
31. Taylor, T. L., & Ivanoff, J. (2005). Inhibition of return and repetition priming effects in localization and discrimination tasks. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 75-89.
32. Verfaellie, M., Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1988). Attentional factors in the occurrence of stimulus-response compatibility effects. Neuropsychologia, 26, 435-444.
33. Walley, R. E., McLeod, B. E., & Weiden, T. D. (1994). Increased attention to the irrelevant dimension increases interference in a spatial Stroop task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 467-492.
34. Weaver, B., Lupiáñez, J., & Watson, F. L. (1998). The effects of practice on object-based, location-based, and static-display inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 993-1003.
35. Weeks, D. J., Chua, R., & Hamblin, K. (1996). Attention shifts and the Simon effect: A failure to replicate Stoffer (1991). Psychological Research, 58, 246-253.
36. Wuhr, P., & Waszak, F. (2003). Object-based attentional selection can modulate the Stroop effect. Memory & Cognition, 31(6), 983-994.
37. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1996). Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: New perceptual objects or visual masking? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1505-1513.
38. Zimba, L. D., & Brito, C. F. (1995). Attention precuing and Simon effects: A test of the attention-coding account of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 58,102-118.