Reducing problems of sociability in online communities: Integrating online communication with offline interaction

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 53, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1170-1193

  Matzat, Uwe ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Blended communities; E learning; Embeddedness; Free riding; Knowledge sharing; Online community; Sociability; Social networks; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949528783     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: 15523381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002764209356249     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64-77.
2. Barab, S.A. (2003). An introduction to the special issue: Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. The Information Society, 19(3), 197-201.
3. Barab, S.A., MaKinster, J.G., & Scheckler, R. (2003). Designing system dualities: Characterizing a web-supported professional development community. The Information Society, 19(3), 237-256.
4. Bluemink, J., & Järvelä, S. (2004). Face-to-face encounters as contextual support for Web-based discussions in a teacher education course. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(3), 199-215.
5. Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57.
6. Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Butler, B.S. (2002). Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Information Systems Research, 12(4), 346-362.
8. Chen, I.Y.L. (2007). The factors influencing members' continuance intentions in professional virtual communities: A longitudinal study. Journal of Information Science, 33(4), 451-467.
9. Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
10. Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Cress, U. (2004). Strategic, metacognitive, and social aspects in resource-oriented knowledge exchange. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsch (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 282-287). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Dannecker, A., & Lechner, U. (2007). Online and offline integration in virtual communities of patients: An empirical analysis. In J. Steinfield, D. Pentland, J. Ackerman, & J. Contractor (Eds.), Communities and technologies: Proceedings of the Third Communities and Technologies Conference (pp. 151-170). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
13. Dawes, R.M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 169-193.
14. Franzen, A. (2002). Social capital and the new communication technologies. In J. Katz (Ed.), Machines that become us (pp. 105-116). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
15. Gal, Y. (2004). The reward effect: A case study of failing to manage knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(2), 73-83.
16. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
17. Hampton, K.N., & Wellman, B. (2003). Neighboring in netville: How the Internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City & Community, 2(4), 277-311.
18. Hargittai, E. (2005). Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Computer Review, 23(3), 371-379.
19. Haythornthwaite, C. (2000). Online personal networks. New Media & Society, 2(2), 195-226.
20. Haythornthwaite, C. (2001). Exploring multiplexity: Social network structures in a computer-supported distance learning class. The Information Society, 17(3), 211-236.
21. Heintz, B. (2000). Gemeinschaft ohne Nähe? Virtuelle Gruppen und reale Netze. In U. Thiedeke (Ed.), Virtuelle Gruppen. Charakteristika und Problemdimensionen [Community without proximity? Virtual groups and real nets] (pp. 188-218). Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
22. Hlebec, V., Manfreda, K.L., & Vehovar, V. (2006). The social support networks of Internet users. New Media & Society, 8(1), 9-32.
23. Ishii, K., & Ogasahara, M. (2007). Links between real and virtual networks: A comparative study of online communities in Japan and Korea. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(2), 252-257.
24. Jarvenpaa, S.L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D.E. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 29-64.
25. Jarvenpaa, S.L., & Leidner, D.E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791-815.
26. Johnson, C.M. (2001). A survey of current research on online communities of practice. Internet and Higher Education, 4(1), 45-60.
27. Kleine Staarman, J. (2003). Face-to-face talk to support computer-mediated discussion in a primary school literacy practice. Reading, 2(37), 73-80.
28. Kling, R., & Courtright, C. (2003). Group behavior and learning in electronic forums: A socio-technical approach. The Information Society, 19(3), 221-235.
29. Kollock, P. (1999). The economies of online cooperation: Gifts and public goods in cyberspace. In M. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in Cyberspace (pp. 220-239). London: Routledge.
30. Komito, L. (1998). The Net as a foraging society: Flexible communities. The Information Society, 14(2), 97-106.
31. Matzat, U. (2004a). Academic communication and Internet discussion groups: Transfer of information or creation of social contacts? Social Networks, 26(3), 221-255.
32. Matzat, U. (2004b). The social embeddedness of academic online groups as a norm generating structure: A test of the Coleman model on norm emergence. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 10(3), 205-226.
33. Matzat, U. (2006). Knowledge management in a virtual organization: Are embedded online communities of practice more successful than exclusively virtual ones? (NWO Project No. 014-43-618). Den Haag, Netherlands: Dutch Science Foundation.
34. Matzat, U. (2009a). The embeddedness of academic online groups in offline social networks: Reputation gain as a stimulus for online discussion participation? International Sociology, 24(1), 63-92.
35. Matzat, U. (2009b). A theory of relational signals in online groups. New Media & Society, 11(3), 375-394.
36. McLure Wasko, M., & Faraj, S. (2000). It is what one does: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2/3), 155-173.
37. Paulhus, D.L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17-59). New York: Academic Press.
38. Parks, M.R. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 80-97.
39. Parks, M.R., & Roberts, L.D. (1998). Making MOOsic: The development of personal relationships on line and a comparison to their off-line counterparts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(4), 517-537.
40. Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
41. Raub, W., & Weesie, J. (1990). Reputation and efficiency in social interactions: An example of network effects. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 626-654.
42. Ridings, C.M., Gefen, D., & Arinze, B. (2002). Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3/4), 271-295.
43. Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, A.M., & McCarthy, J. (2003). The researcher's dilemma: Evaluating trust in computer mediated communications. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 58(6), 759-781.
44. Schlager, M.S., & Fusco, J. (2003). Teaching professional development, technology, and communities of practice: Are we putting the cart before the horse? The Information Society, 19(3), 203-220.
45. Snijders, C., & Weesie, J. (1999). Sociale oriëntaties, tijdspreferenties en de stabiliteit van relaties. In M.Kalmijn, W. Bernasco, & J. Weesie (Eds.), Huwelijks- en samenwoonrelaties in Nederland: De organisatie van afhankelijkheid [Social orientations, time preferences and the stability of relations] (pp. 209-226). Assen, Netherlands: van Gorcum.
46. Stoddart, L. (2001). Managing intranets to encourage knowledge sharing: Opportunities and constraints. Online Information Review, 25(1), 19-28.
47. Thorn, B.K., & Connolly, T. (1987). Discretionary data bases: A theory and some experimental findings. Communication Research, 14(5), 512-528.
48. Utz, S. (2000). Social information processing in MUDs: The development of friendships in virtual worlds. Retrieved November 20, 2000, from http://www.behavior.net/JOB/v1n1/utz.html.
49. van Schuur, W., & Kiers, H.A.L. (1994). Why factor analysis often is the incorrect model for analyzing bipolar concepts, and what model to use instead. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18(2), 97-110.
50. Wellman, B. (2001). Computer networks as social networks. Science, 293(14), 2031-2034.
51. Wellman, B., Boase, J., & Chen, W. (2002). The networked nature of community online and offline. IT & Society, 1(1), 151-165.
52. Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Net surfers don't ride alone: Virtual communities as communities. In B. Wellman (Ed.), Networks in the global village (pp. 331-367). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
53. Wenger, E.C. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54. Wick, C. (2000). Knowledge management and leadership opportunities for technical communicators. Technical Communication, 47(4), 515-529.
55. Yang, S.C., & Liu, S.F. (2004). Case study of online workshop for the professional development of teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(6), 733-761.
56. Yuan, Y.C., Gay, G., & Hembrooke, H. (2006). Focused activities and the development of social capital in a distributed learning community. Information Society, 22(1), 25-39.
57. Zhao, S. (2006). Do Internet users have more social ties? A call for differentiated analyses of Internet use. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, Article 8. Available at http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue3/zhao.html (accessed January 13, 2010).