Effect of organically and conventionally produced diets on jejunal gene expression in chickens

British Journal of Nutrition

Volumn 103, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 696-702

  De Greeff, Astrid ^a   Huber, MacHteld ^b   Van De Vijver, Lucy ^b   Swinkels, Willem ^a   Parmentier, Henk ^a   Rebel, Johanna ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b LOUIS BOLK INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Chickens; Diet; Nutrigenomics; Organic feed

Indexed keywords

ACETOACETYL COENZYME A SYNTHASE; CHEMOKINE; CHEMOKINE AH221; IMMUNOGLOBULIN HEAVY CHAIN; ISOPENTENYL DIPHOSPHATE DELTA ISOMERASE; ISOPENTENYL DIPHOSPHATE DELTA ISOMERASE 2; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN CLASS 3; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN CLASS 3 G; SYNTHETASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CHOLESTEROL;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; CHOLESTEROL SYNTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA MICROARRAY; FOOD; FOOD INTAKE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; IMMUNOREGULATION; JEJUNUM; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; NUTRIGENOMICS; ORGANIC FOOD; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ANIMAL MODEL; BIOSYNTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIET; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETICS; GENOME; HEALTH FOOD; IMMUNE SYSTEM; IMMUNOLOGY;

ANIMALIA; AVES; GALLUS GALLUS;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; CHICKENS; CHOLESTEROL; DIET; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENOME; HEALTH FOOD; IMMUNE SYSTEM; JEJUNUM; MODELS, ANIMAL; NUTRIGENOMICS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 77949515285     PISSN: 00071145     EISSN: 14752662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114509992273     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Williams CM (2002) Nutritional quality of organic food: shades of grey or shades of green? Proc Nutr Soc 61, 19-24.
2. Finamore A, Britti MS, Roselli M, et al. (2004) Novel approach for food safety evaluation. Results of a pilot experiment to evaluate organic and conventional foods. J Agric Food Chem 52, 7425-7431.
3. Bourn D & Prescott J (2002) A comparison of the nutritional value, sensory qualities, and food safety of organically and conventionally produced foods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 42, 1-34.
4. Barrett DM, Weakley C, Diaz JV, et al. (2007) Qualitative and nutritional differences in processing tomatoes grown under commercial organic and conventional production systems. J Food Sci 72, C441-C451.
5. Ovesna J, Slaby O, Toussaint O, et al. (2008) High throughput 'omics' approaches to assess the effects of phytochemicals in human health studies. Br J Nutr 99, Suppl. 1, ES127-ES134.
6. Perez-Jimenez F, Alvarez de Cienfuegos G, Badimon L, et al. (2005) International conference on the healthy effect of virgin olive oil. Eur J Clin Invest 35, 421-424.
7. Menendez JA, Vazquez-Martin A, Colomer R, et al. (2007) Olive oil's bitter principle reverses acquired autoresistance to trastuzumab (Herceptin) in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer 7, 80.
8. Mukherjee S, Gangopadhyay H & Das DK (2008) Broccoli: a unique vegetable that protects mammalian hearts through the redox cycling of the thioredoxin superfamily. J Agric Food Chem 56, 609-617.
9. Roberts MA, Mutch DM & German JB (2001) Genomics: food and nutrition. Curr Opin Biotechnol 12, 516-522.
10. Rebel JM, Van Hemert S, Hoekman AJ, et al. (2006) Maternal diet influences gene expression in intestine of offspring in chicken (Gallus gallus). Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 145, 502-508.
11. Hollingsworth JW, Maruoka S, Boon K, et al. (2008) In utero supplementation with methyl donors enhances allergic airway disease in mice. J Clin Invest 118, 3462-3469.
12. Huber M (editor) (2007) Organic, More Healthy? A Search for Biomarkers of Potential Health Effects Induced by Organic Products, Investigated in a Chicken Model. Louis Bolk Institute Publication no. M22. Driebergen: Louis Bolk Institute.
13. Huber M, van de Vijver LPL, Parmentier H, et al. (2009) Effects of organically and conventionally produced feed on biomarkers of health in a chicken model. Br J Nutr (epub-lication ahead of print version).
14. Parmentier HK, Nieuwland MG, Rijke E, et al. (1996) Divergent antibody responses to vaccines and divergent body weights of chicken lines selected for high and low humoral responsiveness to sheep red blood cells. Avian Dis 40, 634-644.
15. van Hemert S, Hoekman AJ, Smits MA, et al. (2004) Differences in intestinal gene expression profiles in broiler lines varying in susceptibility to malabsorption syndrome. Poult Sci 83, 1675-1682.
16. Jaffrezic F, de Koning DJ, Boettcher PJ, et al. (2007) Analysis of the real EADGENE data set: comparison of methods and guidelines for data normalisation and selection of differentially expressed genes (open access publication). Genet Sel Evol 39, 633-650.
17. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R & Chu G (2001) Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 5116-5121.
18. Lammerts van Bueren ET, Struik PC & Jacobsen E (2002) Ecological concepts in organic farming and their consequences for an organic crop ideotype. Neth J Agr Sci 50, 1-26.
19. Przystalski M, Osman A, Thiemt E, et al. (2008) Comparing the performance of cereal varieties in organic and non-organic cropping systems in different European countries. Euphytica 163, 417-433.
20. Murphy KM, Campbell KG, Lyon SR, et al. (2007) Evidence of varietal adaptation to organic farming systems. Field Crop Res 102, 172-177.
21. Espenshade PJ & Hughes AL (2007) Regulation of sterol synthesis in eukaryotes. Annu Rev Genet 41, 401-427.
22. Scrimshaw NS (2007) Prologue: historical introduction. Immu-nonutrition in health and disease. Br J Nutr 98, Suppl. 1, S3-S4.
23. Lamont SJ (1998) The chicken major histocompatibility complex and disease. Rev Sci Tech 17, 128-142.
24. Kreukniet MB, Gianotten N, Nieuwland MB, et al. (1994) In vitro T cell activity in two chicken lines divergently selected for antibody response to sheep erythrocytes. Poult Sci 73, 336-340.
25. Kreukniet MB, Jeurissen SH, Nieuwland MG, et al. (1996) The B cell compartment of two chicken lines divergently selected for antibody production: differences in structure and function. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 51, 157-171.
26. Parmentier HK, Kreukniet MB, Goeree B, et al. (1995) Differences in distribution of lymphocyte antigens in chicken lines divergently selected for antibody responses to sheep red blood cells. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 48, 155-168.
27. Parmentier HK, Lammers A, Hoekman JJ, et al. (2004) Different levels of natural antibodies in chickens divergently selected for specific antibody responses. Dev Comp Immunol 28, 39-49.