Large-scale ICT innovation, power, and organizational change: The case of a regional health information network

Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 76-90

  Constantinides, Panos ^a,b   Barrett, Michael ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ICT innovation; Networks; Organizational change; Power; Strateg

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744534651     PISSN: 00218863     EISSN: 15526879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0021886305284291     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Astley, G. W., & Sachdeva, P. S. (1984). Structural sources of intraorganizational power: A theoretical synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 9, 104-113.
2. Berg, M., & Bowker, G. (1997). The multiple bodies of the medical record: Towards a sociology of an artifact. Sociological Quarterly, 38, 511-535.
3. Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out - Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Constantinides, P., & Barrett, M. (2005). Approaching information infrastructure as an ecology of ubiquitous sociotechnical relations. In C. Sorensen, Y. Yoo, K. Lyytinen, & J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Designing ubiquitous information environments: Sociotechnical issues and challenges (pp. 249-260). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
5. Coombs, R., Knights, D., & Wilmott, H. C. (1992). Culture, control and competition: Towards a conceptual framework for the study of information technology in organizations. Organization Studies, 13, 51-72.
6. Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. (2001). Disrupted routines: Team learning and newtechnology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 685-716.
7. Fujimura, J. (1996). Crafting science: A sociohistory of the quest for the genetics of cancer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (1993). Appealing work: An investigation of how ethnographic texts convince. Organization Science, 4, 595-616.
9. Hanseth, O., & Monteiro, E. (1997). Inscribing behavior in information infrastructure standards. Accounting, Management and Information Technology, 7, 183-211.
10. Heracleous, L., & Barrett, M. (2001). Organizational change as discourse: Communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 755-778.
11. Hinings, C. R., & Greenwood, R. (2002). Disconnects and consequences in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 411-421.
12. Jasperson, J., Carte, T. A., Saunders, C. S., Butler, B. S., Croes, H. J. P., & Zheng, W. (2002). Review: Power and information technology research: A metatriangulation review. MIS Quarterly, 26, 397-459.
13. Kling, R. (1980). Social analyses of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. Computing Surveys, 12, 61-110.
14. Kling, R., & Iacono, S. (1984). The control of information systems development after implementation. Communications of the ACM, 27, 1218-1226.
15. Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691-710.
16. Lapointe, L., & Rivard, S. (2005). A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Quarterly, 29, 461-491.
17. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Law, J., & Callon, M. (1995). Engineering and sociology in a military aircraft project: A network analysis of technological change. In S. L. Star (Ed.), Ecologies of knowledge: Work and politics in science and technology (pp. 281-301). New York: State University of New York Press.
19. Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34, 583-598.
20. Mohr, L. B. (1982). Explaining organizational behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11, 404-428.
22. Pfeffer, J. (1982). Organizations and organization theory. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
23. Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
24. Robey, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (1999). Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications. Information Systems Research, 10, 167-185.
25. Sabherwal, R., & Newman, M. (2003). Persistence and change in system development: A dialectical view. Journal of Information Technology, 18, 69-92.
26. Sillince, J. A. A., & Mouakket, S. (1997). Varieties of political process during systems development. Information Systems Research, 8, 368-397.
27. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, "translations" and boundary objects: A mateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.
28. Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7, 111-134.
29. Strauss, A. (1978). Negotiations: Varieties, contexts, processes, and social cries. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.