Climate and terrain factors explaining streamflow response and recession in Australian catchments

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 159-169

  Van Dijk, A I J M ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASEFLOW; CATCHMENT; CLIMATE EFFECT; DATA INTERPRETATION; DRAINAGE; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; LAND USE; SOIL QUALITY; STREAMFLOW; TERRAIN; VARIOGRAM;

AUSTRALIA;

EID: 76649086354     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: 16077938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-14-159-2010     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Akaike, H.: Statistical predictor identification Ann. Inst. Stat. Math., 22, 203-217 doi:10.1007/BF02506337, 1970.
2. Bergström, S.: Bergstrom, S.: The HBV model-its structure and applications, Report RH No. 4, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Hydrology, Norrkping, Sweden, 35 pp. 1992.
3. Beven, K.: Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling, Adv. Water Resour., 16, 41-41, 1993.
4. Blöschl, G. and Sivapalan, M.: Scale issues in hydrological modelling: A review, Hydrol. Process., 9, 251-290, 1995.
5. Brandes, D., Hoffmann, J. G., and Mangarillo, J. T.: Base flow recession rates, low flows, and hydrologic features of small watersheds in Pennsylvania, USA, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 41, 1177-1186, 2005.
6. Burnash, R. J. C., Ferral, R. L., and McGuire, R.: A Generalized Streamflow Simulation System-Conceptual Modeling for Digital Computers, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Weather Service and State of California, Department of Water Resources, 1973.
7. Chapman, T.: A comparison of algorithms for stream flow recession and baseflow separation, Hydrol. Process., 13, 701-714, 1999.
8. Chapman, T. G.: Modelling stream recession flows, Environ. Modell. Softw., 18, 683-692, 2003.
9. Chiew, F. H. S., Peel, M. C., and Western, A. W.: Application and testing of the simple rainfall-runoff model SIMHYD, in: Mathematical Models of Small Watershed Hydrology and Applications, edited by: Singh, V. P. and Frevert, D. K., Water resources Publication Littleton, Colorado, USA, 335-367, 2002.
10. Coutagne, A.: Etude ǵeńerale des variations de d́ebits en fonction des facteurs qui les conditionnent, 2́eme partie: les variations de d́ebit en ṕeriode non infuenćee par les pŕecipitations, La Houille Blanche, 416-436, 1948.
11. Guerschman, J.-P., Van Dijk, A. I. J. M., McVicar, T. R., Van Niel, T. G., Li, L., Liu, Y., and Peña-Arancibia, J.: Water balance estimates from satellite observations over the Murray-Darling Basin, CSIRO, Canberra, Australia, 93 pp., 2008.
12. Haberlandt, U., Klöcking, B., Krysanova, V., and Becker, A.: Regionalisation of the base flow index from dynamically simulated flow components-a case study in the Elbe River Basin, J. Hydrol., 248, 35-53, 2001.
13. Jakeman, A. J. and Hornberger, G. M.: How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model?, Water Resour. Res. 29, 2637-2649, 1993.
14. Merz, R. and Blöschl, G.: Regionalisation of catchment model parameters, J. Hydrol., 287, 95-123, 2004.
15. Nathan, R. J. and McMahon, T. A.: Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses, Water Resour. Res., 26, 1465-1473, 1990.
16. Oudin, L., Andŕeassian, V., Lerat, J., and Michel, C.: Has land cover a significant impact on mean annual streamflow? An international assessment using 1508 catchments, J. Hydrol., 357, 303-316, 2008.
17. Peel, M. C., Chiew, F. H. S., Western, A. W., and McMahon, T. A.: Extension of Unimpaired Monthly Streamflow Data and Regionalisation of Parameter Values to Estimate Streamflow in Ungauged Catchments. Report prepared for the Australian National Land andWater Resources Audit., Centre for Environmental Applied Hydrology, The University of Melbourne, 2000.
18. Santhi, C., Allen, P. M., Muttiah, R. S., Arnold, J. G., and Tuppad, P.: Regional estimation of base flow for the conterminous United States by hydrologic landscape regions, J. Hydrol., 351, 139-153, 2008.
19. Schoups, G., van de Giesen, N. C., and Savenije, H. H. G.: Model complexity control for hydrologic prediction, Water Resour. Res., 44, W00B03, doi:10.1029/2008WR006836, 2008.
20. Sivapalan, M., Takeuchi, K., Franks, S. W., Gupta, V. K., Karambiri, H., Lakshmi, V., Liang, X., McDonnell, J. J., Mendiondo, E. M., O'Connell, P. E., Oki, T., Pomeroy, J. W., Schertzer, D., Uhlenbrook, S., and Zehe, E.: IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003-2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences, Hydrol. Sci. J., 48, 857-880, doi:10.1623/hysj.48.6.857.51421, 2003. (Pubitemid 37529254)
21. Tallaksen, L. M.: A review of baseflow recession analysis, J. Hydrol., 165, 349-370, 1995.
22. van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Hairsine, P. B., Arancibia, J. P., and Dowling, T. I.: Reforestation, water availability and stream salinity: A multi-scale analysis in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia, Forest Ecol. Manag., 251, 94-109, 2007.
23. Wagener, T. and Wheater, H. S.: Parameter estimation and regionalization for continuous rainfall-runoff models including uncertainty, J. Hydrol., 320, 132-154, 2006.
24. Weisman, R. N.: The effect of evapotranspiration on streamflow recession, Hydrol. Sci. Bull., XXII, 371-377, 1977.
25. Wittenberg, H.: Baseflow recession and recharge as nonlinear storage processes, Hydrol. Process., 13, 715-726, 1999.
26. Wittenberg, H. and Sivapalan, M.: Watershed groundwater balance estimation using streamflow recession analysis and baseflow separation, J. Hydrol., 219, 20-33, 1999.
27. Zecharias, Y. B. and Brutsaert, W.: Recession characteristics of groundwater outflow and baseflow from mountainous watersheds, Water Resour. Res., 24, 1651-1658, 1988.
28. Zhang, L., Hickel, K., Dawes, W. R., Chiew, F. H. S., Western, A. W., and Briggs, P. R.: A rational function approach for estimating mean annual evapotranspiration Water Resour. Res., 40, W02502, doi:10.1029/2003WR002710, 2004.