Evolution of pacing for bradycardias: Sensors

European Heart Journal, Supplement

Volumn 9, Issue I, 2007, Pages

  Lau, Chu Pak ^a   Tse, Hung Fat ^a   Camm, A John ^b   Barold, Serge S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b ST GEORGE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Chronotropic incompetence; Exercise; Pacing; Rate adaptive pacing; Sensor; Sinus node disease

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949357393     PISSN: 1520765X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/sum057     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Cammilli L. Initial use of a PH triggered pacemaker. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1989;12:1000-1007.
2. Rickards AF, Norman J. Relation between QT interval and heart rate: new design of physiologically adaptive cardiac pacemaker. Br Heart J 1981;45:56-61.
3. Wirtzfeld A, Goedel-Meinen L, Bock T, Heinze R, Liss HD, Munteanu J. Central venous oxygen saturation for the control of automatic rate responsive pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1982;5:829-835.
4. Rossi P. The birth of the respiratory pacemaker. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1990;13:812-815.
5. Humen DP, Kostuk WJ, Klein GJ. Activity-sensing, rate-responsive pacing: improvement in myocardial performance with exercise. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1985;8:52-59.
6. Lau CP, Antoniou A, Ward DE, Camm AJ. Initial clinical experience with a minute ventilation sensing rate modulated pacemaker: improvements in exercise capacity and symptomatology. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;11:1815-1822.
7. Adamson PB, Magalski A, Braunschweig F, Böhm M, Reynolds D, Steinhaus D, Luby A, Linde C, Ryden L, Cremers B, Takle T, Bennett T. Ongoing right ventricular hemodynamics in heart failure: clinical value of measurements derived from an implantable monitoring system. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:565-571.
8. Yu CM, Wang L, Chau E, Chan RH, Kong SL, Tang MO, Christensen J, Stadler RW, Lau CP. Intrathoracic impedance monitoring in patients with heart failure: correlation with fluid status and feasibility of early warning preceeding hospitalisation. Circulation 2005;112:841-848.
9. Karlof I. Haemodynamic effect of atrial triggered versus fixed rate pacing at rest and during exercise in complete heart block. Acta Med Scand 1975;197:195-206.
10. Kristensson BE, Arnman K, Ryden L. The haemodynamic importance of atrioventricular synchrony and rate increase at rest and during exercise. Eur Heart J. 1985;6:773-778.
11. Wilkoff BL, Corey J, Blackburn G. A mathematical model of the cardiac chronotropic response to exercise. J Electrophysiol 1989;3:176.
12. Kay GN. Quantitation of chronotropic response: comparison of methods for rate-modulating permanent pacemakers. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:1533-1541.
13. Greenberg B, Chatterjee K, Parmley WW, Werner JA, Holly AN. The influence of left ventricular filling pressure on atrial contribution to cardiac output. Am Heart J 1982;49:687-692.
14. Tse HF, Siu CW, Lee KLF, Fan K, Chan HW, Tang MO, Tsang V, Lee SW, Lau CP. The incremental benefit of rate-adaptive pacing on exercise performance during cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:2292-2297.
15. Lau CP, Tse HF, Kay N. Sensor driven pacing: device specifics. In: Ellenbogen K, Kay N, Lau CP, Wilkoff B, eds. Clinical Cardiac Pacing Defibrillation, and Resynchornization Therapy. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier, 2007. Ch. 16, pp. 499-530.
16. Benditt DG, Mianulli M, Fetter J, Benson DW, Jr, Dunnigan A, Molina E, Gornick CC, Almquist A. Single-chamber cardiac pacing with activity-initiated chronotropic response, evaluation by cardiopulmonary testing. Circulation 1987;75:184-191.
17. Bonnet JL, Geroux L, Cazeau S, on behalf of the French Talent DR Pacemaker Investigators. Evaluation of a dual sensor rate responsive pacing system based on a new concept. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;25:2198-2203.
18. Baig MW, Wilson J, Boute W, Begemann MJ, Cobbold JP, Perrins EJ. Improved pattern of rate responsiveness with dynamic slope setting for the QT sensing pacemaker. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1989;12:311-320.
19. Schaldach M, Hutten H. Intracardiac impedance to determine sympathetic activity in rate responsive pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1992;15:1778-1786.
20. Witte J, Reibis R, Pichlmaier AM et al. ANS-controlled rate-adaptive pacing: clinical evaluation. Eur J Cardiac Pacing Electrophysiol 1996;6:53-59.
21. Plicchi G, Marcelli E, Parlapiano M, Bombardini T. PEA I and PEA II based implantable haemodynamic monitor: pre-clinical studies in sheep. Europace 2002;4:49-54.
22. Clementy J. Dual chamber rate responsive pacing system driven by contractility: final assessment after 1-year follow-up. The European PEA Clinical Investigation Group. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:2192.
23. Charles RG, Heemels JP, Westrum BL. Accelerometer-based adaptive-rate pacing: a multicenter study. European EXCEL Study Group. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993;16:418-425.
24. Lau CP. Comparative hemodynamic studies between different rate adaptive modes. In: Lau CP (ed.), Rate Adaptive Cardiac Pacing. Armonk, NY: Futura Publishing Co Inc, 1993. Ch. 5, pp. 51-62.
25. Lau CP, Rushby J, Leigh-Jones M, Tam CY, Poloniecki J, Ingram A, Sutton R, Camm AJ. Symptomatology and quality of life in patients with rate-responsive pacemakers a double blind cross-over study. Clin Cardiol 1989;12:505-512.
26. Sulke N, Chambers J, Dritsas A, Sowton E. A randomised double-blind crossover comparison of four rate-responsive pacing modes. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:696-706.
27. Padeletti L, Pieragnoli P, di Biase L, Colella A, Landolina M, Moro E, Orazi S, Vicentini A, Maglia G, Pensabene O, Raciti G, Barold SS. Is a dual-sensor pacemaker appropriate in patients with sino-atrial disease? Results from the DUSISLOG study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2006;29:34-40.
28. Healy JS, Toff WD, Lamas GA, Andersen HR, Thorpe KE, Ellenbogen KA, Lee KL, Skene AM, Schron EB, Skehan JD, Goldman L, Roberts RS, Camm AJ, Yusuf S, Connolly SJ. Cardiovascular outcomes with atrial-based pacing compared with ventricular pacing with meta analysis of randomized trials, using individual patient data. Circulation 2006;114:11-17.
29. Shukla HH, Flaker GC, Hellkamp AS, James EA, Lee KL, Goldman L, Orav EJ, Lamas GA. Clinical and quality of life comparison of accelerometer, piezoelectric crystal, and blended sensor in DDD-R paced patients with sinus node dysfunction in the mode selection trial (MOST). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005;28:762-770.
30. Lau CP, Tai YT, Leung WH, Wong CK, Lee P, Chung FL. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life. Eur Heart J 1994;15:1445-1455.
31. Tse HF, Lau CP, Park E, Bornzin GA, Yu C, Benser ME, Bloomfield DM, Padeletti L. Transient overdrive pacing upon standing prevents orthostatic hypotension in elderly pacemaker patients with chronotropic incompetence. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2007;30:188-192.
32. Scharf C, Cho YK, Bloch KE, Brunckhorst C, Duru F, Balaban K, Foldvary N, Liu L, Burgess RC, Candinas R, Wilkoff BL. Diagnosis of sleep-related breathing disorders by visual analysis of transthoracic impedance signals in pacemakers. Circulation 2004;27;110:2562-2567.