Clinical and quality of life comparison of accelerometer, piezoelectric crystal, and blended sensors in DDDR-paced patients with sinus node dysfunction in the Mode Selection Trial (MOST)

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 762-770

  Shukla, Himanshu H ^a,f   Flaker, Greg C ^a   Hellkamp, Anne S ^b   James, Erskine A ^a   Lee, Kerry L ^b   Goldman, Lee ^c   Orav, E John ^d   Lamas, Gervasio A ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e Miami Heart Inst   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Accelerometer; Blended sensor; Piezoelectric crystal sensors; Sensors; Sinus node dysfunction

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETER; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART FAILURE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; MORTALITY; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PIEZOELECTRICITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVASCULARIZATION; SENSOR; SINUS NODE DYSFUNCTION; STROKE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODE; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK FACTORS; SICK SINUS SYNDROME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 27844499765     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00184.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Lamas GA, Williams A. Have the results of randomized clinical trials of pacing altered the practice of cardiac pacing? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003; 14:1.
2. Candinas R, Jakob M, Buckingham TA, et al. Vibration, acceleration, gravitation, and movement: Activity controlled rate adaptive pacing during treadmill exercise testing and daily life activates. PACE 1997; 20:1777-1786.
3. Benditt DG, Mianulli M, Fetter J, et al. Single chamber cardiac pacing with activity-initiated chronotropic response: Evaluation by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Circulation 1987; 75: 183.
4. Lau CP, Wong C-K, Leung W-H, et al. Superior cardiac hemodynamics of atrioventricular synchrony over rate-responsive pacing at sub maximal exercise: Observations in activity-sensing DDDR pacemakers. PACE 1990; 13:1832.
5. Buckingham TA, Wodruf RC, Pennington G, et al. Effect of ventricular function on the exercise hemodynamics of variable rate pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 11:169.
6. McElroy P, Janicki JS, Weber KT. Physiologic correlates of the heart rate response to upright isotonic exercise: Relevance to rate-responsive pacemaker. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 11(1):94.
7. Lamas GA, Lee K, Sweeney M, et al. Ventricular pacing or dual chamber pacing for sinus node dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:1854-1862.
8. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40:373-383.
9. Karnofsky DA, Abelmann WH, Craver LF, et al. The use of nitrogen mustards in the palliative treatment of carcinoma. Cancer 1948; 2:634-656.
10. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health status survey (SF-36): Conceptual framework and item item selection. Med Care 1992; 30:473-483.
11. Goldman L, Hashimoto B, Cook EF, et al. Comparative reproducibility and validity of systems for assessing cardiovascular functional class: Advantages of a new specific activity scale. Circulation 1981; 64:1227-1234.
12. Janosik DL, Ellenbogen KA. Basic physiology of cardiac pacing and pacemaker syndrome. In: Ellenbogen KA, Wilkoff BL (eds.): Clinical Cardiac Pacing and Defibrillation, 2nd Ed. Philadelphia, PA, WB Saunders, 2000, pp. 333-352.
13. Lindemans FW, Rankin IR, Murtaugh, et al. Clinical experience with an activity sensing pacemaker. PACE 1986; 9:978.
14. Perrins EJ, Morley CA, Chan SL, et al. Randomized controlled trial of physiological and ventricular pacing. Br Heart J 1983; 50:112.
15. Zegelman M, Cieslinski G, Kreuzer J. Rate response during submaximal exercise: Comparison of three different sensors. PACE 1988; 11:1888.
16. Lau CP, Rushby J, Leigh-Jones M, et al. Symptomatology and quality of life in patients with rate-responsive pacemakers: A double blind cross over study. Clin Cardiol 1989; 12:505.
17. Lau CP, Stott JR, Toff WD, et al. Selective vibration sensing: A new concept for activity-sensing rate-responsive pacing. PACE 1988; 12:1299.
18. Alt E, Matula M, Theres H, et al. The basis for activity controlled rate variable cardiac pacemakers: An analysis of mechanical forces on the human body induced by exercise and environment. PACE 1989; 12:1667.
19. Ellenbogen K, Kay NG, Wilkoff B. Clinical Cardiac Pacing and Defibrillation, 2nd Ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 2000, pp. 251.
20. Telectronics Pacing systems: Meta DDDR, clinical study summary. Documents No. 130-3081, Rev 1, April 1992.
21. Lau CP, Antoniou A, Ward DE, Camm AJ. Reliability of minute ventilation as a parameter for rate-responsive pacing. PACE 1989; 12:321.
22. Lau CP. The combination of sensors and algorithms. In: Lau CP (ed.): Rate Adaptive Cardiac Pacing: Single and Dual Chamber. Mount Kisco, New York, Futura Publishing, 1993, pp. 213-227.
23. Benditt DG, Mianulli M, Lurie K, et al. Multiple sensor systems for physiologic cardiac pacing. Ann Intern Med 1994; 121:960-968.