Evaluation of a dual sensor rate responsive pacing system based on a new concept

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 21, Issue 11 II, 1998, Pages 2198-2203

  Bonnet, Jean Luc ^a,c   Géroux, Laurence ^a   Cazeau, Serge ^b  

^a ELA Medical   (France)

^b Clinique Chirurgicale du Val d'Or   (France)

^c ELA Recherche   (France)

Author keywords

Accelerometer; Dual sensor; Minute ventilation; Rate responsive pacing

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETER; ADULT; AGED; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; BIOSENSOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUNG MINUTE VOLUME; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; SINUS RHYTHM; TREADMILL EXERCISE;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; CARDIAC PACING, ARTIFICIAL; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 0031724816     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01152.x     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Benditt DG, Mianulli M, Fetter J, et al. Single-chamber cardiac pacing with activity-initiated chronotropic response: Evaluation by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Circulation 1987; 75:184-191.
2. Lau CP, Rushby J, Leigh-Jones M, et al. Symptomatology and quality of life in patients with rate-responsive pacemakers: A double-blind, randomized, crossover study. Clin Cardiol 1989; 12:505-512.
3. Furman S. Rate-modulated pacing. Circulation 1990; 82:1081-1094.
4. Benditt DG, Mianulli M, Fetter J, et al. Single-chamber cardiac pacing with activity-initiated chronotropic response; evaluation by cardiopulmonary testing. Circulation 1987; 75:184-191.
5. Bowes R, Bonnet JL, Dixon M, et al. Response of a new accelerometer VVIR pacemaker during daily life tests. In A Oto (ed.): Cardiac Pacing 1995. Bologna, Italy, Monduzi Editore, pp. 59-62.
6. Nappholtz T, Valenta H, Maloney J, et al. Electrode configurations for respiratory impedance measurement suitable for rate responsive pacing. PACE 1986; 9:960-964.
7. Bonnet JL, Ritter P, Pioger G. Measurement of minute ventilation with different DDDR pacemaker electrode configurations. Investigators of a Multicenter Study Evaluating the Chorus RM and Opus RM Pacemakers. PACE 1998; 21:4-10.
8. Rickards AF, Norman J. Relation between QT interval and heart rate. New design of physiologically adaptive cardiac pacemaker. Br Heart J 1981; 45:56-61.
9. Gillette P. Critical analysis of sensors for physiological responsive pacing. PACE 1984; 7:1263-1266.
10. Lau CP, Butrous GS, Ward DE, et al. Comparison of exercise performance of six rate-adaptive right ventricular cardiac pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63:833-838.
11. Sulke N, Chambers J, Dritsas A, et al. A randomized double-blind crossover comparison of four rate-responsive pacing modes. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17:696-706.
12. Alt E, Matula M, Holzer K. Behavior of different activity-based pacemakers during treadmill exercise testing with variable slopes: A comparison of three activity-based pacing systems. PACE 1994; 17:1761-1770.
13. Leung SK, Lau CP, Tang MO, et al. New integrated sensor pacemaker: Comparison of rate responses between an integrated minute ventilation and activity sensor and single sensor modes during exercise and daily activities and nonphysiological interference. PACE 1996; 19:1664-1671.
14. Candinas R, Jakob M, Buckingham TA, et al. Vibration, acceleration, gravitation, and movement: Activity controlled rate adaptive pacing during treadmill exercise testing and daily life activities. PACE 1997; 20:1777-1786.
15. Katritsis D, Camm AJ. Adaptive-rate pacemakers. Comparison of sensors and clinical experience. Cardiol Clin 1992; 10:671-690.
16. Katritsis D, Shakespeare CF, Camm AJ. New and combined sensors for adaptive-rate pacing. Clin Cardiol 1993; 16:240-248.
17. Alt E, Theres H, Heinz M, et al. A new rate-modulated pacemaker system optimized by combination of two sensors. PACE 1988; 11:1119-1129.
18. Stangl K, Wirtzfeld A, Heinze ML, et al. A new multisensor pacing system using stroke volume, respiratory rate, mixed venous oxygen saturation, and temperature, right atrial pressure, right ventricular pressure, and dP/dt. PACE 1988; 11:712-724.
19. Provenier F, van Acker R, Backers J, et al. Clinical observations with a dual sensor rate adaptive single chamber pacemaker. PACE 1992; 15:1821-1825.
20. Connelly DT. Initial experience with a new single chamber, dual sensor rate responsive pacemaker. The Topaz Study Group. PACE 1993; 16:1833-1841.
21. Ovsyshcher I, Guldal M, Karaoguz R, et al. Evaluation of a new rate adaptive ventricular pacemaker controlled by double sensors. PACE 1995; 18:386-390.
22. Leung SK, Lau CP, Tang MO. Cardiac output is a sensitive indicator of difference in exercise performance between single and dual sensor pacemakers. PACE 1998; 21:35-41.
23. Leung SK, Lau CP, Wu CW, et al. Quantitative comparison of rate response and oxygen uptake kinetics between different sensor modes in multisensor rate adaptive pacing. PACE 1994; 17:1920-1927.
24. Cowell R, Morris-Thurgood J, Paul V, et al. Are we being driven to two sensors?: Clinical benefits of sensor cross-checking. PACE 1993; 16:1441-1444.
25. Wilkoff BL, Corey J, Blackburn G. A mathematical model of the cardiac chronotropic response to exercise. J Electrophysiol 1989; 3:176-180.
26. Pioger G, Bonnet JL, Vai F, et al. Evaluation of a minute ventilation rate adaptive pacemaker by cardio-pulmonary tests. In Santini (ed.): Progress in Clinical Pacing. Armonk, NY, Futura Publishing, 1994, pp. 343-358.
27. Ritter P, Vai F, Bonnet JL, et al. Rate adaptive atrio-ventricular delay improves cardio-pulmonary performance in patients implanted with a dual chamber pacemaker for complete heart block. Eur JCPE 1991; 1:31-38.
28. Malinowski K, Morschhïuser D, Bonnet JL. A minute-ventilation sensor can provide a fast response at the beginning of short calibrated tests. Cardiostimolazione 1994; 12:229.
29. Bonnet JL, Baudoin C. Rate response simulation software using the pacemaker Holter function. (abstract) Cardiostimulazione 1992; 10:306.
30. Bonnet JL. Evaluation clinique de la fonction de stimulation d'un stimulateur a frequence asservie. Stimucoeur 1996; 24:193-198.
31. Lau CP, Leung SK, Guerola M, et al. Comparison of continuously recorded sensor and sinus rates during daily life activities and standardized exercise testing: Efficacy of automatically optimized rate adaptive dual sensor pacing to simulate sinus rhythm. PACE 1996; 19:1672-1677.
32. Leung SK, Lau CP, Wu CW, et al.Quantitative comparison of different sensor modes in multi sensor rate-adaptive pacing. (abstract) Eur JCPE 1994; 4:37.
33. Sulke N, Kamalvand K, Bostock J, et al. Dual sensor VVIR mode pacing: Is it worth it? PACE 1996; 19:1560-1567.
34. Celiker A, Tokel K, Lenk MK, et al. Dual sensor pacemakers in children: What is the choice of sensor blending? PACE 1997; 20:1301-1304.
35. Lau CP, Leung SK, Lee IS. Delayed exercise rate response kinetics due to sensor cross-checking in a dual sensor rate adaptive pacing system: The importance of individual sensor programming. PACE 1996; 19:1021-1025.