Keratoconus and normal-tension glaucoma: A study of the possible association with abnormal biomechanical properties as measured by corneal hysteresis (an AOS thesis)

Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society

Volumn 107, Issue , 2009, Pages 282-299

  Cohen, Elisabeth J ^a  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRIMONIDINE; LATANOPROST;

A SCAN; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA CURVATURE; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DRUG HYPERSENSITIVITY; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; HYSTERESIS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOCONUS; KERATOMETRY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC NERVE; PACHYMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; TOPOGRAPHY; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; CORNEA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; KERATOCONUS; LOW TENSION GLAUCOMA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC DISK; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 77949355231     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15456110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:714-720.
2. Ozbek Z, Cohen EJ, Hammersmith KM, Rapuano CJ. Dynamic contour tonometry: a new way to assess intraocular pressure in ectatic corneas. Cornea 2006;25:890-894.
3. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:156-162.
4. Friedenwald JS. Contribution to the theory and practice of tonometry. Am J. Ophthalmol 1937;20:985-1024.
5. Edmund C. Assessment of an elastic model in the pathogenesis of keratoconus. Acta Ophthalmol 1987;65:545-550.
6. Edmund C. Corneal rigidity and ocular rigidity in normal and keratoconic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 1988;66:134-140.
7. Brooks AMV, Robertson IF, Mahoney A. Ocular rigidity and intraocular pressure in keratoconus. Aust J Ophthalmol 1984;12:317-324.
8. Foster CS, Yamamoto GK. Ocular rigidity in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 1978;86:802-806.
9. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Mantry S, Cunliffe I. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the Ocular Response Analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:3026-3031.
10. Ortiz D, Pinero D, Shabayek MH, Arnalich-Montiel F, Alio JL. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:1371-1375.
11. Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. Applied Longitudinal Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2004:291-321.
12. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Logistic regression for matched case-control studies. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1989:187-215.
13. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988:1-40.
14. Casson RJ, Abraham LM, Newland HS, et al. Corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in a nonglaucomatous Burmese population. Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:981-985.
15. Medieros FA, Sample PA, Zangwill LM, et al. Corneal thickness as a risk factor for visual field loss in patients with preperimetric glaucomatous topic neuropathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:805-813.
16. Dueker DK, Singh K, Lin SC, et al. Corneal thickness measurement in the management of primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2007;114;1779-1787.
17. Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the Ocular Response Analyzer. J Glaucoma 2006;15:364-370.
18. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, Grover V, Quigley HA. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141:868-875.
19. Brown KE, Congdon NG. Corneal structure and biomechanics: impact of the diagnosis and management of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006;17:338-343.
20. Kotecha A. What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician? Surv Ophthalmol 2007;52:S109-114.
21. Dupps WJ. Hysteresis: new mechanospeak for the ophthalmologist. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;31:156-162.
22. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Cunliffe I, Mantry S. The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2006;29:257-262.
23. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:146-155.
24. Carbonaro F, Andrew T, Mackey DA, Spector TD, Hammond CJ. The heritability of corneal hysteresis and ocular pulse amplitude. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1545-1549.
25. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF. Corneal thickness and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:5337-5347.
26. Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Cunliffe I, Shah S. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis in normal subjects: relevance in clinical context. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006;34:114-118.
27. Kida T, Liu JHK, Weinreb RN. Effects of aging on corneal biomechanical properties and their impact on 24-hour measurement of intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;146:567-572.
28. Jonas JB, Berenshtein E, Holbach L. Lamina cribrosa thickness and spatial relationships between intraocular space and cerebrospinal fluid space in highly myopic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:2660-2665.
29. Burgoyne CF, Downs JC, Bellezza AJ, et al. The optic nerve head as a biomechanical structure: a new paradigm for understanding the role of IOP-related stress and strain in the pathophysiology of glaucomatous optic nerve head damage Prog Retin Eye Res 2005;24:39-73.
30. Broman AT, Congdon NG, Bandeen-Roche K, Quigley HA. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma 2007;16:581-588.
31. Song Y, Congdon N, Li L, et al. Corneal hysteresis and axial length among Chinese secondary school children: the Xichang pediatric refractive error study (X-PRES) report No. 4. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:819-826.
32. Schultz DS, Lotz JC, Lee SM, Trinidad ML, Stewart JM. Structural factors that mediate scleral stiffness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:4232-4236.
33. Wells AP, Garway-Heath DF, Poostchi A, Wong T, Chan KCY, Sachdev N. Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface compliance in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:3262-3268.
34. Kerautret J, Colin J, Touboul D, Roberts. Biomechanical characteristics of the ectatic cornea. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:510-513.
35. Stewart WC, Stewart JA, Nassar QJ, Mychaskiw MA. Cost-effectiveness of treating ocular hypertension. Ophthalmology 2008;115:94-98.
36. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;126:487-497.