Simulation of the stomatal conductance of winter wheat in response to light, temperature and CO2 changes

Annals of Botany

Volumn 93, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 435-441

  Yu, Qiang ^a   Zhang, Yongqiang ^a   Liu, Yunfen ^a   Shi, Peili ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHIC SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH   (China)

Author keywords

CO2; Humidity; Light intensity; Model; Stomatal conductance; Temperature

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; HUMIDITY; LIGHT INTENSITY; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; WHEAT;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHINA; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG EFFECT; LIGHT; METABOLISM; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT EPIDERMIS; RADIATION EXPOSURE; TEMPERATURE; WHEAT;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CHINA; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LIGHT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT EPIDERMIS; TEMPERATURE; TRITICUM;

EID: 2442709301     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mch023     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aphalo PJ, Jarvis PG. 1991. Do stomata respond to relative humidity? Plant, Cell and Environment 14: 127-132.
2. Ball JT, Woodrow IE, Berry JA. 1987. A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. In: Biggins I, ed. Progress in photosynthesis research. Amsterdam: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 221-224.
3. Calvet J-C. 2000. Investigating soil and atmospheric plant water stress using physiological and micrometeorological data. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 103: 229-247.
4. 2 responses of leaf and canopy photosynthesis: a clarification using the non-rectangular hyperbola model of photosynthesis. Annals of Botany 82: 883-892.
5. Collatz GJ, Ball JT, Grivet C, Berry JA. 1991. Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 54: 107-136.
6. Cox PM, Huntingford C, Harding RJ. 1998. A canopy conductance and photosynthesis model for use in a GCM land surface scheme. Journal of Hydrology 212-213: 79-94.
7. Cowan IR. 1965. Transport of water in the soil-plant-atmosphere system. Journal of Applied Ecology 2: 221-239
8. Dewar RC. 1995. Interpretation of an empirical model for stomatal conductance in terms of guard cell function. Plant, Cell and Environment 18: 365-372.
9. Gottschalck JC, Gillies RR, Carlson TN. 2001. The simulation of canopy transpiration under doubled CO2: the evidence and impact of feedbacks on transpiration in two 1-D soil-vegetation-atmosphere-transfer models. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 106: 1-21.
10. Hanan NP, Prince SD. 1997. Stomatal conductance of West-Central Supersite vegetation in HAPEX-Sahel: measurements and empirical models. Journal of Hydrology 188-189: 536-562.
11. 2 at the catchment scale. Australian Journal of Botany 40: 679-696.
12. Jarvis PG. 1976. The interpretation of the variations in water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Ser. B 273: 593-610.
13. Jarvis PJ, McNaughton KG. 1986. Stomatal control of transpiration: scaling up from leaf to region. In: Advances in Ecological Research, Vol. 15, London: Academic Press, 86-112.
14. Lagergren F, Lindroth A. 2002. Transpiration response to soil moisture in pine and spruce trees in Sweden. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 112: 67-85.
15. 3 plants. Plant, Cell and Environment 18: 339-355.
16. Leverenz JW. 1994. Factors determining the nature of the light dosage response curve of leaves. In: Baker NR, Bowyer JR, eds. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis from molecular mechanisms to the field. Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers, 239-254.
17. Lhomme J-P. 1991. The concept of canopy resistance: historical survey and comparison of different approaches. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 54: 227-240.
18. 2 exchange. Forest Ecological Management 52: 261-278.
19. Monteith JL 1995. A reinterpretation of stomatal responses to humidity. Plant, Cell and Environment 18: 357-364.
20. Sellers PJ. 1996. A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs. Part I. Model formulation. Journal of Climate 9: 676-705.
21. Sheriff DW. 1984. Epidermal transpiration and stomatal responses to humidity: some hypotheses explored. Plant, Cell and Environment 7: 669-677.
22. Thom AS. 1975. Momentum, mass and heat exchange of plant communities. In: Monteith IL, ed. Vegetation and the atmosphere. Vol. 1. Principles. London: Academic Press, 57-109.
23. Thornley JHM. 1976. Mathematical models in plant physiology. London: Academic Press, 86-110.
24. Xu DQ, Li DY, Shen YG, Liang GA. 1984. On midday depression of photosynthesis of wheat leaf under field conditions. Acta Phytophysiologica Sinica 10: 269-276 [in Chinese, with English abstract].
25. Yu Q, Goudriaan J, Wang T D. 2001. Modeling diurnal courses of photosynthesis and transpiration of leaves on the bases of stomatal and non-stomatal responses, including photoinhibition. Photosynthetica 39: 43-51.
26. Yu Q, Liu YF, Liu JD, Wang TD. 2002. Simulation of leaf photosynthesis of winter wheat on Tibet plateau and in North China plain. Ecological Modelling 155: 205-216.