Information policy and management framework for environmental protection organization with ecosystem conception

International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 313-326

  Chen, H W ^a   Yu, R F ^b   Liaw, S L ^c   Huang, W C ^c  

^a CHAOYANG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL UNITED UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Data life cycle; Data quality system; Information ecology; Information flow

Indexed keywords

DATA QUALITY; ECOSYSTEM APPROACH; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION POLICY; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; SOFTWARE;

TAIWAN;

EID: 77949340642     PISSN: 17351472     EISSN: 17352630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03326141     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abkowitz, M. D.; Cohen, M. A.; Buck, S. S.; Case, D. W.; Drake, P. A., (1999). Environmental information disclosure and stakeholder involvement: Searching for common ground. Corp. Environ. Strategy, 6 (4), 415-424 (10 pages).
2. Chen, C. C., (2009). Environmental impact assessment framework by integrating scientific analysis and subjective perception. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 6 (4), 605-618 (14 pages).
3. Cranefield, S.; Purvis, M., (2001). Integrating environmental information: incorporating metadata in a distributed information system's architecture. Adv. Environ. Res., 5 (4), 319-325 (7 pages).
4. Davenport, T. H.; Prusak, L., (1997). Information ecology: Mastering the information and knowledge environment. Oxford University Press, New York.
5. de Brisis, K., (1995). Government policy for information resources management and its implication for provision of information services to the public and to the experts. Computers, Environ. Urban Syst., 19 (3), 141-149 (9 pages).
6. Garvey, P., (1998). Environmental protection agency provides internet users with environmental information through web-enabled data warehouse. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hygiene, 13 (4), 216-220 (5 pages).
7. Gil-Garcia, J. R.; Pardo, T. A., (2005). E-government success factors: mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Gov. Inform. Q., 22 (2), 187-216 (30 pages).
8. Graham, A. W., (1985). The two ecologies: Population and community perspectives on organizational evolution. Admin. Sci. Quart., 30 (2), 224-241 (18 pages).
9. Haklay, M. E., (2003). Public access to environmental information: Past, present and future. Computers, Environ. Urban Syst., 27 (2), 163-180 (18 pages).
10. Huang, P. S.; Shih, L. H., (2008). Effective environmental management through environmental knowledge management. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 6 (1), 35-50 (16 pages).
11. Huh, Y. U., (1990). Data quality. Infor. Software Tech., 32(8), 559-565 (7 pages).
12. Karmarkar, U. S.; Apte, U. M., (2007). Operations management in the information economy: Information products, processes, and chains. J. Oper. Manage., 25 (2), 438-453 (6 pages).
13. Kuchka, H. E., (2001). Method for theory: A prelude to human ecosystems. J. Ecol. Anthropol., 5 (Special), 3-78 (76 pages).
14. Leire, C.; Thidell, A., (2005). Product-related environmental information to guide consumer purchases - a review and analysis of research on perceptions, understanding and use among Nordic consumers. J. Clean. Produc., 13 (10-11), 1061-1070 (10 pages).
15. Moreton, R.; Simon, E.; Sloane, A., (1995). Implementing information management and technology standards: A framework. Tech. Manage., 2 (6), 275-288 (14 pages).
16. Mutula, S.; Wamukoya, J. M., (2009). Public sector information management in east and southern Africa: Implications for FOI, democracy and integrity in government. Int. J. Inform. Manage., 29 (5), 333-341 (9 pages).
17. Nalle, D. J.; Montgomery, C. A.; Claire, A. J.; Arthur, L.; Polasky, S. S., (2004). Modeling joint production of wildlife and timber. J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 48 (3), 997-1017 (21 pages).
18. Prokopiadou, G.; Papatheodorou, C.; Moschopoulos, D., (2004). Integrating knowledge management tools for government information. Govern. Inform. Q., 21 (2), 170-198 (19 pages).
19. Purvis, M.; Cranefield, S.; Ward, R.; Nowostawski, M.; Carter, D.; Bush, G., (2003). A multi-agent system for the integration of distributed environmental information. Environ. Modell. Softw., 18 (6), 565-572 (8 pages).
20. Reddick, C. G., (2005). Citizen interaction with e-government: from the streets to servers? Govern. Inform. Q., 22 (1), 38-57 (20 pages).
21. Scholl, H. J., (2006). Electronic government: Information management capacity, organizational capabilities and the sourcing mix. Govern. Inform. Q., 23 (1), 73-96 (24 pages).
22. Seifert, J. W., (2004). Data mining and the search for security: Challenges for connecting the dots and databases. Govern. Inform. Q., 21(4), 461-480 (20 pages).
23. Sofia Pereira, C.; Soares, A. L., (2007). Improving the quality of collaboration requirements for information management through social networks analysis. Int. J. Inform. Manage., 27 (2), 86-103 (18 pages).
24. Steep, J. R., (1999). Prospectus for information ecology. Georg. J. Ecol. Anthropol., 3, 38-54 (17 pages).
25. Szaro, R. C.; Berc, J.; Cameron, S.; Cordle, S.; Crosby, M.; Martin, L.; Norton, D.; O'Malley, R.; Ruark, G., (1998). The ecosystem approach: Science and information management issues, gaps and needs. Landscape Urban Plan., 40 (1-3), 89-101 (13 pages).
26. Tuzkaya, G.; Gülsün, B., (2008). Evaluating centralized return centers in a reverse logistics network: An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 5 (3), 339-352 (14 pages).
27. TWEPA, (2002). A planning and setting of metadata system, managed and public method, local environmental database in environmental database system and advertisement in taiwan (EPA-91-L105-02-214), Taiwan. (in Chinese).
28. USEPA, (2002a). Overview of the EPA Quality System, Office of Environmental Information, (EPA/240/R-02/003), United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC 20460.
29. USEPA, (2002b). Policy and Program Requirements for the Mandatory Agency-wide Quality, Office of Environmental Information (EPA Order 5360.1 A2), United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC 20460.
30. Wang, R. Y.; Reddy, M. P.; Kon, H. B., (1995). Toward quality data: an attribute-based approach. Decis. Support Syst., 13, 349-372 (24 pages).
31. Wang, R. Y.; Strong, D. M., (1996). Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers? J. Manage. Syst., 12, 5-34 (30 pages).
32. Ward, M.; Mitchell, S., (2004). A comparison of the strategic priorities of public and private sector information resource management executives. Govern. Inform. Q., 21 (3), 284-304 (21 page).
33. Yu, R. F.; Chen, H. W.; Cheng, W. P.; Chi, F. H.; Liaw, S. L.; Yu, Y. H., (2004). Development of a data quality management system for ROC EPA. J. Chinese Inst. Environ. Eng., 14(3), 141-149 (9 pages).