Enhancement of bistable perception associated with visual stimulus rivalry

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 586-591

  Kang, Min Suk ^a   Blake, Randolph ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION;

ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 50949123133     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.3.586     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. ANDREWS, T., & PURVES, D. (1997). Similarities in normal and binocularly rivalrous viewing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 9905-9908.
2. ATKINSON, J., CAMPBELL, F. W., FIORENTINI, A., & MAFFEI, L. (1973). The dependence of monocular rivalry on spatial frequency. Perception, 2, 127-133.
3. BAKER, D. H., MEESE, T. S., & SUMMERS, R. J. (2007). Psychophysical evidence for two routes to suppression before binocular summation of signals in human vision. Neuroscience, 146, 435-448.
4. BLAKE, R. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review, 96, 145-167.
5. BLAKE, R., & LOGOTHETIS, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 13-21.
6. BLAKEMORE, C., & CAMPBELL, F. W. (1969). On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. Journal of Physiology, 203, 237-260.
7. BONDS, A. B. (1989). Role of inhibition in the specification of orientation selectivity of cells in the cat striate cortex. Visual Neuroscience, 2, 41-55.
8. BONNEH, Y., SAGI, D., & KARNI, A. (2001). A transition between eye and object rivalry determined by stimulus coherence. Vision Research, 41, 981-989.
9. BRAINARD, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
10. BRASCAMP, J. W., VAN EE, R., PESTMAN, W. R., & VAN DEN BERG, A. V. (2005). Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception. Journal of Vision, 5, 287-298.
11. BREESE, B. B. (1899). On inhibition. Psychological Monographs, 3, 1-65.
12. CARANDINI, M., HEEGER, D. J., & MOVSHON, J. A. (1997). Linearity and normalization in simple cells of macaque primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 8621-8644.
13. CRICK, F., & KOCH, C. (1995). Are we aware of neural activity in primary visual cortex? Nature, 375, 121-123.
14. DING, J., & SPERLING, G. (2006). A gain-control theory of binocular combination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 1141-1146.
15. FOX, R., & CHECK, R. (1968). Detection of motion during binocular rivalry suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 388-395.
16. HAMMETT, S. T., SNOWDEN, R. J., & SMITH, A. T. (1994). Perceived contrast as a function of adaptation duration. Vision Research, 34, 31-40.
17. HAYNES, J.-D., DEICHMANN, R., & REES, G. (2005). Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature, 438, 496-499.
18. KIM, C. Y., & BLAKE, R. (2005). Psychophysical magic: Rendering the visible "invisible." Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 381-388.
19. LAING, C. R., & CHOW, C. C. (2002). A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 12, 39-53.
20. LEE, S.H., & BLAKE, R. (1999). Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 39, 1447-1454.
21. LEHKY, S. R. (1988). An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry. Perception, 17, 215-228.
22. LEOPOLD, D. A., & LOGOTHETIS, N. K. (1996). Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature, 379, 549-553.
23. LEOPOLD, D. A., & LOGOTHETIS, N. K. (1999). Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 254-264.
24. LOGOTHETIS, N. K., LEOPOLD, D. A., & SHEINBERG, D. L. (1996). What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature, 380, 621-624.
25. LOGOTHETIS, N. K., & SCHALL, J. D. (1989). Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. Science, 245, 761-763.
26. LUMER, E., FRISTON, K., & REES, G. (1998). Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science, 280, 1930-1934.
27. MORRONE, M. C., BURR, D. C., & MAFFEI, L. (1982). Functional implications of cross-orientation inhibition of cortical visual cells: I. Neurophysiological evidence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 216, 335-354.
28. PEARSON, J., & CLIFFORD, C. W. (2005). When your brain decides what you see: Grouping across monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalry. Psychological Science, 16, 516-519.
29. PELLI, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
30. POLONSKY, A., BLAKE, B., BRAUN, J., & HEEGER, D. J. (2000). Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1153-1159.
31. TONG, F., & ENGEL, S. A. (2001). Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature, 411, 195-199.
32. WALKER, G. A., OHZAWA, I., & FREEMAN, R. D. (1998). Binocular cross-orientation suppression in the cat's striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 227-239.
33. WALKER, P., & POWELL, D. J. (1979). The sensitivity of binocular rivalry to changes in the nondominant stimulus. Vision Research, 19, 247-249.
34. WILSON, H. R. (2003). Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 14499-14503.
35. WUNDERLICH, K., SCHNEIDER, K. A., & KASTNER, S. (2005). Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1595-1602.