Highly efficient methyl ketone synthesis with photoactivated acetone and olefins assisted by Mg(II)-exchanged zeolite y

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 75, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1450-1457

  Tsukamoto, Daijiro ^a   Shiraishi, Yasuhiro ^a   Hirai, Takayuki ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AB INITIO MOLECULAR ORBITAL CALCULATION; ADSORPTION EXPERIMENT; C-C COUPLING; CARBONYL MOIETY; CHARGE POLARIZATION; ELECTROSTATIC INTERACTIONS; HIGH SELECTIVITY; HIGH YIELD; HYDROGEN ABSTRACTION; METHYL KETONES; PHOTO-ACTIVATED; PHOTO-IRRADIATION; PHOTOREACTIONS; RADICAL ADDITION; RADICAL FORMATION; ROOM TEMPERATURE; ZEOLITE PORES; ZEOLITE-Y;

ADSORPTION; EXCITED STATES; MOLECULAR ORBITALS; OLEFINS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

ACETONE;

ACETONE; ALKENE; CARBONYL DERIVATIVE; CATION; MAGNESIUM ION; ZEOLITE;

AB INITIO CALCULATION; ARTICLE; ELECTRICITY; PHOTOREACTIVITY; POLARIZATION; ROOM TEMPERATURE; SYNTHESIS;

ACETONE; ALKENES; CATALYSIS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; KETONES; MAGNESIUM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, CHEMICAL; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; STEREOISOMERISM; ZEOLITES;

EID: 77949279285     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: 15206904     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo902321f     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. a) Cainelli, G.; Cardillo, G. Chromium Oxidants in Organic Chemistry; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1984.
2. b) Ley, S. V.; Mladin, A. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Trast, B. M., Fleming, I., Ley, S. V., Eds.; Pcrgamon: Oxford, UK, 1991; Vol. 7, p 251.
3. a) ten Brink, G.-J.; Arends, I. W. C. E.; Sheldon, R. A. Scice 2000, 287, 1636-1639.
4. b) Graves, C. R.; Zeng, B.-S.; Nguyen, S. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12596-12597.
5. c) Schultz, M. J.; Park, C. C.; Sigman, M. S. Chem. Commun. 2002, 3034-3035.
6. a) Cornell, C. N.; Sigman, M. S. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 1903-1909.
7. b) Cornell, C. N.; Sigman, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2796-2797.
8. c) Mitsudome, T.; Umetani, T.; Nosaka, N.; Mori, K.; Mizugaki, T.; Ebitani, K.; Kaneda, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 481-485.
9. d) ten Brink, G.-J.; Arends, I. W. C. E.; Papadogianakis, G.; Sheldon, R. A. Chem. Commun. 1998, 2359-2360.
10. Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2457-2483.
11. Shiraishi, Y.; Tsukamoto, D.; Hirai, T. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3117-3120.
12. Nakashima, M.; Hayon, E. J. Phys. Chem. 1971, 75, 1910-1914.
13. a) Shimizu, N.; Miyahara, T.; Mishima, M.; Tsuno, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1989, 62, 2032-2039.
14. b) Przybytek, J. T.; Singh, S. P.; Kagan, J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1969, 1224-1225.
15. a) Dedinas, J.; Regan, T. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1972, 76, 3926-3933.
16. b) Boate, D. R.; Johnston, L. J.; Scaiano, J. C. Can. J. Chem. 1989, 67, 927-932.
17. c) Shoute, L. C. T.; Mittal, J. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 8630-8637.
18. a) Ramamurthy, V.; Turro, N. J. J. Inclusion Phenom. 1995, 21, 239-282.
19. a) Del Bene, J. E. Chem. Phys. 1979, 40, 329-335.
20. b) Raber, D. J.; Raber, N. K.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Schleyer, P. v. R. Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23, 4076-4080.
21. c) Guo, B. C.; Conklin, B. J.; Castleman, A. W., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 6506-6510.
22. d) Remko, M. Mol. Phys. 1997, 91, 929-936.
23. a) Shailaja, J.; Lakshminarasimhan, P. H.; Pradhan, A. R.; Sunoj, R. B.; Jockusch, S.; Karthikeyan, S.; Uppili, S.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Turro, N. J.; Ramamurthy, V. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 3187-3198.
24. b) Ramamurthy, V.; Shailaja, J.; Kaanumalle, L. S.; Sunoj, R. B.; Chandrasekhar, J. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1987-1999.
25. a)Frisch,M. J.;Trucks,G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.; Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; and Pople, J. A. Gaussian 03, Revision B.05; Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2004.
26. b) Dennington, R., II; Keith, T.; Millam, J.; Eppinnett, K.; Hovell, W. L.; Gilliland, R. Gauss View, Version 3.09; Semichem, Inc., Shawnee Mission, KS, 2003.
27. Sunoj, R. B.; Lakshminarasimhan, P.; Ramamurthy, V.; Chandrasekhar, J. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 1598-1604.
28. a) Head-Gordon, M.; Pople, J. A.; Frisch, M. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1988, 153, 503-506.
29. b) Frisch, M. J.; Head-Gordon, M.; Pople, J. A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1990, 166, 275-280.
30. c)Frisch, M. J.; Head-Gordon, M.; Pople, J. A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1990, 166, 281-290.
31. Phosphorescence analysis usually provides important information on the nature of the excited-state carbonyl compounds within zeolite (ref 11). However, in the present case, the analysis does not provide clear information on the nature of excited-state acetone within MgY in the absence and presence of water. Figure S2 (Supporting Information) shows phosphorescence spectra of acetone measured at 77 K. In a diethyl ether/2-propanol glass, a distinctive emission assigned to acetone phosphorescence appears at 455 nm: Borkman, R. F.; Kearns, D. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1966, 44, 945-949.
32. In contrast, acetone adsorbed on MgY shows a red-shifted emission at 493 nm. As reported in the following, the red-shifted emission is assigned to the phosphorescence of the protonated acetone formed by a reaction with acidic hydroxy! groups on zeolite: Bosacek, V.; Kubelkova, L. Zeolites 1990, 10, 64-65.
33. A similar emission red shift is observed on highly acidic HY, In contrast, no emission red shift is observed on less acidic CsY: Okamoto, S.; Nishiguchi, H.; Anpo, M. Chem. Lett. 1992, 1009-1012.
34. max= 467 nm). This is probably because, as reported in the following, hydration of zeolite weakens its acidity and suppresses the protonation of acetone: Ward, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1968, 72, 4211-4213.
35. These indicate that the zeolite acidity strongly affects the acetone phosphorescence. A clear explanation as to how the cation affects the nature of the excited acetone within zeolite in the absence and presence of water, therefore, cannot be made.
36. a) Clark, T. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1986, 1774-1776.
37. b) Clark, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11278-11285.
38. a) Morkin, T. L.; Turro, N. J.; Kleinman, M. H.; Brindle, C. S.; Kramer, W. H.; Gould, I. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14917-14924.
39. b) Chen, Y.-Z.; Wu, L.-Z.; Zhang, L.-P.; Tung, C.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 4676-4681.
40. Shiraishi, Y.; Saito, N.; Hirai, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12820-12822.
41. Adsorption of substrates onto the solid surface depends on the affinity of substrates for the surface and the solubility of substrates in solvents: Wright, E. H. M.; Pratt, N. C. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 1974, 70, 1461-1471.
42. In the present case, acetone/water mixture has a poor solubility of olefins and, hence, allows olefin adsorption onto zeolite. This is confirmed by adsorption experiments of 1 with MgY (Figure S3; Supporting Information): the adsorption of 1 onto MgY in pure acetone is almost zero, but an increase in water content of the solution leads to an increase in the adsorption amount.
43. It must be noted that, as shown in Table 3 and Figure 3, there is no linear relationship between the methyl ketone yield enhancement and the size or the adsorption degree of olefins. This suggests that the electronic structure of olefins (reactivity with the radical I) is also the important factor for methyl ketone production as well as the size and adsorption degree of olefins.
44. Abbot, J.; Wojciechowski, B. W. J. Catal. 1984, 90, 270-278.
45. a) Weitkamp, J.; Ernst, S.; Kumar, R. Appl. Catal. 1986, 27, 207-210.
46. b) Chen, C.; Finger, L. W.; Medrad, R. C.; Kibby, C. L.; Crozier, P. A.; Chan, I. Y.; Harris, T. V.; Beck, L. W.; Zones, S. I. Chem.-Eur. J. 1998, 4, 1312-1323.
47. Tewarl, Y. B.; Miller, M. M.; Waslk, S. P.; Martlre, D. E. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1982, 27, 451-454.
48. Leigh, W. J.; Srinivasan, R. Acc. Chem. Res. 1987, 20, 107-114.
49. Linker, U.; Kersten, B.; Linker, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 51, 9917-9926.
50. Kaanumalle, L. S.; Shailaja, J.; Robbins, R. J.; Ramamurthy, V. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2002, 153, 55-65.
51. Lewis, F. D.; Johnson, D. E. J. Photochem. 1977, 7, 421-423.
52. Shiraishi, Y.; Saito, N.; Hirai, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2005, 127, 8304-8306.
53. Foresman, J. B.; Head-Gordon, M.; Pople, J. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 135-149.
54. Read, A. E.; Weinstock, R. B.; Weinhold, F. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 83, 735-746.