Mathematics and science teachers' pedagogical orientations and their use of ICT in teaching

Education and Information Technologies

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 309-323

  Law, Nancy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

21st century learning outcomes; Connectedness; Impact of ICT use; Lifelong learning; Pedagogical orientation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949261643     PISSN: 13602357     EISSN: 15737608     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-009-9094-z     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Borko, H., & Shavelson, R. (1990). Teacher Decision Making. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction: Implications for educational reform (pp. 311-346). Elmhurst, Ill: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
2. Dexter, S., & Anderson, R. E. (2002). USA: A model of implementation effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the European Conference on Educational Research, Lisbon, Portugal.
3. Dexter, S., Seashore, K. R., & Anderson, R. E. (2002). Contributions of professional community to exemplary use of ICT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(4), 489-497. doi: 10. 1046/j. 0266-4909. 2002. 00260. x.
4. Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., van den Berg, R., & Kelchtermans, G. (2001). Conditions fostering the implementation of large-scale innovation programs in schools: teachers' perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 130-166. doi: 10. 1177/00131610121969262.
5. Kozma, R. B. (ed). (2003). Technology, innovation, and educational change: a global perspective. Eugene, OR: ISTE.
6. Law, N. (2003). Innovative classroom practices and the teacher of the future. In C. Dowling & K. W. Lai (Eds.), Information and communication technology and the teacher of the future (pp. 171-182). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
7. Law, N. (2004). Teachers and teaching innovations in a connected world. In A. Brown & N. Davis (Eds.), Digital technology, communities and education (pp. 145-163). London: Routledge Falmer.
8. Law, N., & Chow, A. (2008a). Pedagogical orientations in mathematics and science and the use of ICT. In N. Law, W. J. Pelgrum & T. Plomp (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT in schools around the world: findings from the SITES 2006 study (pp. 121-179). Hong Kong: CERC and Springer.
9. Law, N., & Chow, A. (2008b). Teacher characteristics, contextual factors, and how these affect the pedagogical use of ICT. In N. Law, W. J. Pelgrum & T. Plomp (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT in schools around the world: findings from the SITES 2006 study. Hong Kong: CERC and Springer.
10. Law, N., & Chow, A. (in press). Developing the teacher questionnaire. In R. Carstens & W. J. Pelgrum (Eds.), IEA SITES 2006 technical report. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
11. Law, N., Yuen, H. K., Ki, W. W., Li, S. C., Lee, Y., & Chow, Y. (eds). (2000). Changing classrooms and changing schools: a study of good practices in using ICT in Hong Kong schools. Hong Kong: CITE, University of Hong Kong.
12. Law, N., Lee, M. W., Chan, A., & Yuen, H. K. (2008a). Factors influencing the impact of ICT-use on students' learning. Paper presented at the Third IEA International Research Conference, September 16-20, 2008, Taipei.
13. Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., Monseur, C., Brese, F., Carstens, R., Voogt, J. M., et al. (2008b). Study design and methodology. In N. Law, W. J. Pelgrum & T. Plomp (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT in schools around the world: findings from the SITES 2006 study (pp. 13-36). Hong Kong: CERC and Springer.
14. Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (eds). (2008c). Pedagogy and ICT in schools around the world: findings from the SITES 2006 study. Hong Kong: CERC and Springer.
15. Law, N., Chow, A., Pelgrum, W. J., Carstens, R., & Pelgrum, W. J. (in press). Scale and indicator construction. IEA SITES 2006 technical report. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
16. Mioduser, D., Nachimias, R., Tubin, D., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2003). Analysis schema for the study of domains and levels of pedagogical innovation in schools using ICT. Education and Information Technologies, 8(1), 23-36. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1023922207476.
17. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9620. 2006. 00684. x.
18. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).(1999). Classifying educational programmes: Manual for ISCED-97 implementation in OECD countries. Paris: Author.
19. Partnership for 21st century skills. (n. d.). Framework for 21st century learning. Tucson, AZ: author. Retrieved 31/10/2008, http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/documents/frameworkflyer_072307.pdf.
20. Pedró, F. (2006). The new millennium learners: challenging our views on ICT and learning. Paris: OECD-CERI.
21. Pelgrum, W. J., & Anderson, R. E. (eds). (1999). ICT and the emerging paradigm for life long learning. Amsterdam: IEA.
22. Plomp, T., Pelgrum, W. J., & Law, N. (2007). SITES2006-International comparative survey of pedagogical practices and ICT in education. Education and Information Technologies, 12(2), 83-92. doi: 10. 1007/s10639-007-9029-5.
23. Shulman, L. S. (1999). Knowledge and teaching: foundation for a new reform. In J. Leach & B. Moon (Eds.), Learners and pedagogy (pp. 61-77). London: Paul Chapman.