Attitudes and satisfaction with a Hybrid model of Counseling Supervision

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 298-306

  Conn, Steven R ^a   Roberts, Richard L ^a   Powell, Barbara M ^a  

^a EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Counseling supervision; Hybrid model; School counselors; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 77749323316     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alpert, D. (1986). A preliminary investigation of computer-enhanced counselor training. Computers in Human Behavior, 2, 63-70.
2. Alterkruse, M. K., & Brew. L. (2000). Using the web for distance learning. In J. W. Bloom & G. R. Walz. (Eds.), Cybercounseling and cyberlearning: Strategies and resources for the millennium (pp. 129-141), Alexandria: American Counseling Association.
3. Anakwe, U. P. (1999). Distance learning and cultural diversity: Potential users' perspective. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 7 (3), 224-244.
4. Barnard, A. (1997). A critical review of the belief that technology is a neutral object and nurses are its master. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26 (1), 126-131.
5. Barret, R. L., & Schmidt, J. J. (1986). School counselor certification and supervision: Overlooked professional issues. Counselor Education and Supervision, 26, 50-55.
6. Benigno, V., & Trentin, G. (2000). The evaluation of online courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16 (3), 259-270.
7. rd Ed.), Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
8. Bobby, C. L., & Capone, L. III (2000). Understanding the implications of distance learning for accreditation and licensure of counselor preparation programs. In J. W. Bloom & G. R. Walz, (Eds.), Cybercounseling and cyberlearning: Strategies and resources for the millennium (pp. 361-377), Alexandria: American Counseling Association.
9. Butler, S. K., & Constantine, M. G. (2006). Web-based peer supervision, collective self-esteem and case conceptualization ability in school counselor trainees. Professional School Counseling, 10, 146-152.
10. Casey, J., Bloom, J. W., & Moan, E. R. (1994). Use of technology in counselor supervision. (Report number EDO- CG-94-00), Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
11. Chen, E. C., & Bernstein, B. L. (2000). Relations of complementarity and supervisory issues to supervisory working alliance: Comparative analysis of two cases. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47 (4), 485-497.
12. Christie, B. S. (1998). Distance clinical supervision in cyberspace: A qualitative study, Oregon State University, USA.
13. Clingerman, T. L., & Bernard, J. M. (2004). An investigation of the use of email as a supplemental modality for clinical supervision. Counselor Education & Supervision, 44 (2), 82-95.
14. nd Ed.), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Davies, R. S., & Mendenhall, R. (1998). Evaluation comparison of online and classroom instruction for HEPE 129 - Fitness and lifestyle management course, retrieved March 2, 2009, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/ contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED427752.
16. DeBourgh, G. A. (1999). Technology is the tool, teaching is the task: Student satisfaction in distance learning. In J. Price, J. Willis, D. A. Willis, M. Jost & S. Boger-Mehall (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 131-137). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
17. Efstation, J. F., Patton, M. J., & Kardash C. M. (1990). Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37 (3), 322-329.
18. Friedlander, M. L. & Ward, L. G. (1984). Development and validation of the supervisory styles inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 541-557.
19. Gamon, D., Sorlie, T., Bergvik, S., & Hoifodt, T. S. (1998). Psychotherapy supervision conducted via videoconferencing: A qualitative study of users' experiences. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 52 (5), 411-421.
20. st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
21. Graf, N. M., & Stebnicki, M. A. (2002). Using e-mail for clinical supervision in practicum: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Rehabilitation, 68 (3), 41-49.
22. Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28, 115-152.
23. Hayes, B. G., & Robinson, E. H. (2000). Assessing counselor education students' attitudes toward computers and multimedia instruction. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development, 38 (3), 132-141.
24. Henderson, P. (1994). Supervision of school counselors (Report No. EDO-CG-94-21), Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
25. Holloway, E. L., & Wampold, B. E. (1983). Patterns of verbal behaviors and judgments of satisfaction in the supervision interview. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 227-234.
26. Janoff, D. S., & Schoenholtz-Read, J. (1999). Group supervision meets technology: A model for computer-mediated group training at a distance. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 49 (2), 255 - 273.
27. Kahn, B. B. (1999). Priorities and practices in field supervision of school counseling students. Professional School Counseling, 3 (2), 128-137.
28. Kjosness, J. (2002). On the net 2002: Social work, Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
29. Ladany, N., Ellis, M. V., & Friedlander, M. L. (1999). The supervisory working alliance, trainee self-efficacy, and satisfaction. Journal of Counseling and Development, 77, 447-455.
30. rd Ed.), Boston: Pearson.
31. Ladany, N., Lehrman-Waterman, D., Molinaro, M., & Wolgast, B. (1999). Psychotherapy supervisor ethical practices: Adherence to guidelines, the supervisory working alliance, and supervisee satisfaction. Counseling Psychologist, 27 (3), 443-475.
32. Lambert, M. E., Hedlund, J. L., & Vieweg, B. W. (1990). Computer simulations in mental health education: Current status. Computers in Human Services, 7 (3-4), 211-229.
33. Larson, D. L., Attkisson, C. C., Hargreaves, W. A., & Nguyen, T. D. (1979). Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: Development of a general scale. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2,197-207.
34. Myrick, R. D., & Sabella, R. A. (1995). Cyberspace: New place for counselor supervision. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 30 (1), 35-45.
35. Nelson, M. D., & Johnson, P. (1999). School counselors as supervisors: An integrated approach for supervising school counseling interns. Counselor Education and Supervision, 39, 89-100.
36. Olson, M. M., Russell, C. S., & White, M. B. (2001). Technological implications for clinical supervision and practice, The Clinical Supervisor, 20 (2), 201-215.
37. Patton, M. J., & Kivlighan, D. M. (1997). Relevance of the supervisory alliance to the counseling alliance and to treatment adherence in counselor training. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44 (1), 108-115.
38. Roberts, R. L., Powell, B. M., & Fraker, F. L. (2002). The effect of technology-mediated group supervision on attitudes toward use of technology and satisfaction with supervision among school counseling interns. Paper presented at the American Counseling Association Conference, March, New Orleans, USA.
39. Salas, E., Kosarzycki, M. P., Burke, C. S., Fiore, S. M., & Stone, D. L. (2002). Emerging themes in distance learning research and practice: Some food for thought. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4 (2), 135-153.
40. Smith, S. B. (1999). The effectiveness of traditional instructional methods in an online learning environment, Doctoral dissertation, Las Vegas, USA: University of Nevada.
41. Wilczenski, F. L., & Coomey, S. M. (2006). Cyber-communication: Finding its place in school counseling practice, education, and professional development. Professional School Counseling, 9 (4), 327-331.
42. Young, J. R. (2002). " Hybrid" teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction. Chronicle of Higher Education, retrieved March 20, 2009 from http://chronicle.com/free/v48/i28/28a03301.htm.