Preferential interactions between small solutes and the protein backbone: A computational analysis

Biochemistry

Volumn 49, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1954-1962

  Liang, Ma ^a   Pegram, Laurel ^a   Record Jr , M T ^a   Cui, Qiang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDITIVITY; ALIPHATIC GROUPS; AMIDE GROUPS; ATOMISTIC SIMULATIONS; BIOMOLECULAR SURFACE; COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; FORCE FIELD MODELS; FORCE FIELDS; GLYCINE BETAINE; GROUP CONTRIBUTIONS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; PEPTIDE BACKBONES; PREFERENTIAL INTERACTION; PROTEIN BACKBONE; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN STABILITY; SEMI-QUANTITATIVE; SOLUTE CONCENTRATIONS; THERMODYNAMIC DATA; THERMODYNAMIC MODEL; TRIGLYCINE; WATER TERNARY SYSTEMS;

AMIDES; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; SYSTEM STABILITY; TERNARY SYSTEMS; THERMODYNAMICS; UREA;

PEPTIDES;

AMIDE; BETAINE; TRIGLYCINE; UREA; WATER;

ARTICLE; DECOMPOSITION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STABILITY; SIMULATION; SOLUTE; THERMODYNAMICS;

BETAINE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; OLIGOPEPTIDES; PROPANE; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STABILITY; SOLUTIONS; THERMODYNAMICS; UREA; WATER;

EID: 77749259034     PISSN: 00062960     EISSN: 15204995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/bi9020082     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Wyman, J. (1964) Linked functions and reciprocal effects in hemoglobin: A second look. Adv. Protein Chem. 19, 223-286.
2. 2.Record,M.T.,Jr.,Zhang,W.T.,andAnderson,C.F.(1998) Analysisofeffectsofsaltsandunchargedsolutesonproteinandnucleicacid equilibriaandprocesses:Apracticalguide- recognizingandinterpretingpolyelectrolyteeffects,Hofmeistereffects, andosmoticeffectsofsalts,Adv.ProteinChem.51,281-353.(Pubitemid28252476)
3. Timasheff, S. N. (1998) Control of protein stability and reactions by weakly interacting cosolvents: The simplicity of the complicated, Adv. Protein Chem. 51, 355-432.
4. Courtenay, E. S., Capp, M. W., Anderson, C. F., and Record, M. T., Jr. (2000) Vapor pressure osmometry studies of osmolyte-protein interactions: Implications for the action, of osmoprotectants in vivo and for the interpretation of "osmotic stress" experiments in vitro. Biochemistry 39, 4455-4471.
5. Hopkins, F. G. (1930) Denaturation of proteins by urea and related substances, Nature 126, 328-330, 383-384.
6. Tanford, C. (1968) Protein denaturation. Adv. Protein Chem. 23, 121-282.
7. Felitsky,D. J., Cannon, J. G., Capp, M. W., Hong, J., Van Wynsberghe, A. W., Anderson, C. F., and Record, M. T., Jr. (2004) The exclusion of glycine betaine from anionic biopolymer surface: Why glycine betaine is an effective osmoprotectant but also a compatible solute. Biochemistry 43, 14732-14743.
8. Storey, R., and Jones, R. G. W. (1975) Betaine and choline levels in plants and their relationship to nacl stress. Plant Sci. Lett. 4, 161-168.
9. Yancey, P. H., Clark, M. E., Hand, S. C., Bowlus, R. D., and Somero, G. N. (1982) Living with water-stress: Evolution of osmolyte systems. Science 217, 1214-1222.
10. Lin, T. Y., and Timasheff, S. N. (1994) Why do some organisms use a urea-methylamine mixture as osmolyte: Thermodynamic compensation of urea and trimethylamine n-oxide interactions with protein. Biochemistry 33, 12695-12701.
11. Yancey, P. H., and Somero, G. N. (1980) Methylamine osmoregulatory solutes of elasmobranch fishes counteract urea inhibition of enzymes. J. Exp. Zool., 212, 205-213.
12. Volker, J., and Breslauer, K. J. (2005) Communication between noncontacting macromolecules. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct.,21:21-42.
13. Frank, H. S., and Franks, F. (1968) Structural approach to solvent power of water for hydrocarbons: Urea as a structure breaker. J. Chem. Phys. 48, 4746.
14. 14. Vanzi, F., Madan, B., and Sharp, K. (1998) Effect of the protein dénaturants urea and guanidinium on water structure: A structural and thermodynamic study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 1074810753. (Pubitemid 28498822)
15. 15. Idrissi, A., Sokolic, F., and Perera, A. (2000) A molecular dynamics study of the urea/water mixture, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 9479-9488. (Pubitemid 30885949)
16. Bennion, B. J., and Daggett, V. (2003) The molecular basis for the chemical denaturation of proteins by urea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 5142-5147.
17. 17. Zou, Q., Habermann-Rottinghaus, S. M., and Murphy, K, P. (1998) Urea effects on protein stability: Hydrogen bonding and the hydrophobic effect, Proteins: Struct., Fund., Genet. 31, 107-115. (Pubitemid 28198703)
18. 18. Tobi, D., Elber, R., and Thirumalai, D. (2003) The dominant interaction between peptide and urea is electrostaticin nature: A molecular dynamics simulation study, Biopolymers 68, 359-369. (Pubitemid 36342872)
19. Lim, W. K., Rosgen, J., and Englander, S. W. (2009) Urea, but not guanidinium, destabilizes proteins by forming hydrogen bonds to the peptide group. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 2595-2600.
20. 20. Paul, S., and Patey, G. N. (2007) The influence of urea and trimethylamine-n-oxide on hydrophobic interactions. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 7932-7933. (Pubitemid 47184362)
21. Hua, L., Zhou, R. H., Thirumalai, D., and Berne, B. J. (2008) Urea denaturation by stronger dispersion interactions with proteins than water implies a 2-stage unfolding, Propc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 16928-16933.
22. Zangi, R., Zhou, R. H., and Berne, B. J. (2009) Urea's action on hydrophobic interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 1535-1541.
23. Shearwin, K. E., and Timasheff, S. N. (1992) Linkage between ligandbinding and control, of tubulin conformation, Biochemistry 31, 8080-8089.
24. Record, M. T., Jr., and Anderson, C. F. (1995) Interpretation of preferential interaction coefficients of nonelectrolytes and of electrolyte ions in terms of a 2-domain model, Biophys. J. 68, 786-794.
25. Cannon, J. G., Anderson, C. F., and Record, M. T., Jr. (2007) Ureaamide preferential interactions in water: Quantitative comparison of model compound data with biopolymer results using water accessible surface areas. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 9675-9685.
26. Hong, J., Capp, M. W., Saecker, R. M., and Record, M. T., Jr. (2005) Use of urea and glycine betaine to quantify coupled folding and probe the burial of DN A phosphates in lac repressor-lac operator bindings. Biochemistry 44, 16896-16911.
27. Capp, M. W., Pegram, L. M., Saecker, R. M., Kratz, M., Riccardi, D., Wendorff, T., Cannon, J. G., and Record, M. T., Jr. (2009) Interactions of glycine betaine with molecular surfaces in water: Thermodynamics, structural interpretation and prediction of m-values. Biochemistry 48, 10372-10379.
28. 28. Caflisch, A., and Karplus, M. (1999) Structural details of urea binding to barnase: A molecular dynamics analysis. Struct. Folding Des. 7, 477-488. (Pubitemid 29230482)
29. Baynes, B. M., and Trout, B. L. (2003) Proteins in mixed solvents: A molecular-level perspective. J. Phys. Chem. B107, 14058-14067.
30. Smith, P. E. (2004) Cosolvent interactions with biomolecules: Relating computer simulation data to experimental thermodynamic data. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 18716-18724.
31. Pierce, V., Kang, M., Aburi, M., Weerasinghe, S., and Smith, P. E. (2008) Recent applications of Kirkwood-Buff theory to biological systems. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 50, 1-22.
32. 32. Kang, M., and Smith, P. E. (2007) Preferential interaction parameters in biological systems by Kirkwood-Buff theory and computer simulation, Fluid Phase Equilib. 256, 14-19. (Pubitemid 46818799)
33. 33. Weerasinghe, S., and Smith, P. E. (2003) A Kirkwood-Buff derived force field for sodium chloride in water, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 1134211349. (Pubitemid 43677182)
34. 34. Weerasinghe, S., and Smith, P. E. (2003) Kirkwood-Buff derived force field for mixtures of acetone and water, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 10663-10670. (Pubitemid 43677182)
35. Weerasinghe, S., and Smith, P. E. (2004) A Kirkwood-Buff derived force .field for the simulation of aqueous guanidinium chloride solutions, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 2180-2186.
36. 36. Weerasinghe, S., and Smith, P. E. (2005) A Kirkwood-Buff derived force field for methanol and aqueous methanol solutions. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 15080-15086. (Pubitemid 41173732)
37. 37. Kang, M., and Smith, P. E. (2006) A Kirkwood-Buff derived force field for amides, J. Comput. Chem. 27, 1477-1485. (Pubitemid 44366223)
38. 38.MacKerell,A.D.,Bashford,D.,Bellott,M.,Dunbrack,R.L.,Evanseck,J.D., Field,M.J.,Fischer,S.,Gao,J.,Guo,H.,Ha,S.,Joseph-McCarthy,D.,Kuchnir,L.,Kuczera, K.,Lau,F.T.K.,Miattos,C.,Michnick,S.,Ngo,T.,Nguyen,D.T.,Prodhom,B.,Reiher,W.E., Roux,B.,Schlenkrich,M.,Smith,J.C.,Stote,R.,Straub,J.,Watanabe,M., Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera,J.,Yin,D.,andKarplus,M.(1998)All- atomempiricalpotentialformolecularmodelinganddynamicsstudiesofproteins. ¿Jhys.Chem.B102,35863616.(Pubitemid128576688)
39. Brooks, B. R., Bruccoleri, R. E., Olafson, B. D., States, D. J., Swaminathan, S., and Karplus, M. (1983) Charmm: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 4,187-217.
40. Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W., and Klein, M. L. (1983) Comparison of simple potential, functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926-935.
41. Steinbach, P. J., and Brooks, B. R. (1994) New spherical-cutoff methods for long-range forces in macromolecular simulation. J. Comput. Chem. 15, 667-683.
42. Essmann, U., Perera, L., Berkowitz, M. L., Darden, T., Lee, H., and Pedersen, L. G. (1995) A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8577-8593.
43. Nose, S. (1984) A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular-dynamics methods, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511-519.
44. Hoover, W. G. (1985) Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695-1697.
45. Andersen, H. C. (1980) Molecular-dynamics simulations at constant pressure and/or temperature, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 2384-2393.
46. Feller, S. E., Zhang, Y. H., Pastor, R. W., and Brooks, B. R. (1995) Constant-pressure molecular-dynamics simulation: The Langevin piston method, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 4613-4621.
47. Ryckaert, J. P., Ciccotti, G., and Berendsen, H. J. C. (1977) Numerical integration of Cartesian equations of motion of a system, with, constraints: Molecular-dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 23, 327-341.
48. 48. Formaneck, M. S., Ma, L., and Cui, Q. (2006) Effects of temperature and salt concentration on the structural stability of human iymphotactin: Insights from molecular simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 9506-9517. (Pubitemid 44121425)
49. 49. Ma, L., and Cui, Q. (2006) The temperature dependence of saltprotein association is sequence specific, Biochemistry 45, 1446614472. (Pubitemid 44865201)
50. Shukla, D., Shinde, C., and Trout, B. L. (2009) Molecular computations of preferential interaction coefficients of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 12546-12554.
51. Harihara, P. C, and Pople, J. A. (1973) Influence of polarization functions on molecular-orbital hydrogenation energies. Theor. Chim. Acta 28, 213-222.
52. Frisch, M. J., Trucks, G. W., Schlegel, H. B., Scuseria, G. E., Robb, M. A., Cheeseman, J. R., Montgomery, J. A., Jr., Vreven, T., Kudin, K, N., Burant, J. C., Millam, J. M., Iyengar, S. S., Tomasi, J., Barone, V., Mennucci, B., Cossi, M., Scalmani, G., Rega, N., Petersson, G. A., Nakatsuji, H., Hada, M., Ehara, M., Toyota, K., Fukuda, R., Hasegawa, J., Ishida, M., Nakajima, T., Honda, Y., Kitao, O., Nakai, H., Klene, M., Li, X., Knox, J. E., Hratchian, H. P., Cross, J. B., Bakken, V., Adamo, C., Jaramillo, J., Gomperts, R., Stratmann, R. E., Yazyev, O., Austin, A. J., Cammi, R., Pomelli, C., Ochterski, J. W., Ayala, P. Y., Morokuma, K. Voth, G. A., Salvador, P., Dannenberg, J. J., Zakrzewski, V. G., Dapprich, S., Daniels, A. D., Strain, M. C., Farkas, O., Malick, D. K., Rabuck, A. D., Raghavachari, K., Foresman, J. B., Ortiz, J. V., Cui, Q., Baboul, A. G., Clifford, S., Cioslowski, J., Stefanov, B. B., Liu, G., Liashenko, A., Piskorz, P., Komaromi, L, Martin, R. L., Fox, D. J., Keith, T., Al-Laham, M. A., Peng, C. Y., Nanayakkara, A., Challacombe, M., Gill, P. M. W., Johnson, B., Chen, W., Wong, M. W., Gonzalez, C., and Pople, J. A. (2004) Gaussian 03, revision. C.02, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT.
53. Frenkel, D., and Smit, B. (2002) Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications, Academic Press, San Diego.
54. Courtenay, E. S., Capp, M. W., and Record, M. T., Jr. (2001) Thermodynamics of interactions of urea and guanidinium salts with protein surface: Relationship between solute effects on protein processes and changes in water-accessible surface area, Protein Sci. 10, 2485-2497.
55. Stumpe, M. C., and Grubmuller, H. (2007) Interaction of urea with amino acids: Implications for urea-induced protein denaturation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 16126-16131.
56. Aburi, M., and Smith, P. E. (2004) A combined simulation and Kirkwood-Buff approach to quantify cosolvent effects on the conformational, preferences of peptides in solution. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 7382-7388.
57. Wetlaufer, D. B., Malik, S. K., Stoller, L., and Coffin, R. L. (1964) Nonpolar group participation in the denaturation of proteins by urea and guanidinium salts. Model compound studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86, 508-514.
58. 58. Graziano, G. (2001) On the solubility of aliphatic hydrocarbons in 7 M! aqueous urea. J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 2632-2637. (Pubitemid 35372844)
59. 59. Stanley, C., and Rau, D. C. (2008) Assessing the interaction of urea and protein-stabilizing osmolytes with the nonpolar surface of hydroxypropylcellulose. Biochemistry 47, 6711-6718. (Pubitemid 351874298)
60. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., and Schulten, K. (1996) Vmd: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics 14, 33-38.