Self-determination of peoples and transnational regimes: A foundational principle of global governance

Transnational Constitutionalism: International and European Models

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 207-268

  Skordas, Achilles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77749245701     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511495076.009     Document Type: Chapter

References (117)

1. J. Rosenau and E.-O. Czempiel, Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).
2. A. Fischer-Lescano and G. Teubner, Regime-Kollisionen - Zur Fragmentierung des globalen Rechts (Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 2006).
3. C. Joerges, I.-J. Sand and G. Teubner, Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2004).
4. A. Hasenclever,P. Mayer and V. Rittberger, Theories of International Regimes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
5. H. Hannum, ‘Rethinking Self-Determination’ (1993) 34 Virginia Journal of International Law (Va JIL) 1-31.
6. N. Luhmann, Law as a Social System, K. Ziegert (trans.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 353-6, 448-52.
7. N. Luhmann, ‘Ich sehe was, was Du nicht siehst’, in N. Luhmann, Soziologische Aufklärung 5 - Konstruktivistische Perspektiven (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1990), pp. 228-34.
8. A. Cassese, Self-Determination of Peoples - A Legal Reappraisal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 109-25.
9. H. G. Espiell, ‘The Right to Self-Determination - Implementation of United Nations Resolutions’, 1980, E/CN.4/Sub.2/405/Rev.1, para. 60.
10. M. Bedjaoui, Pour un nouvel ordre économique international (Paris: UNESCO, 1979).
11. M. Koskenniemi, ‘National Self-Determination Today: Problems of Legal Theory and Practice’ (1994) 43 ICLQ 241,249-50.
12. V. Cassese, International Law in a Divided World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988), p. 93.
13. Crawford, A. The Creation of States in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University 3ress, 1979), p. 101.
14. C. Schmitt, ‘Nomos-Nahme-Name’ [1959], in C. Schmitt, Staat, Großraum, Nomos -Arbeiten aus den Jahren 1916-1959, G. Maschke, (ed.) (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1995), pp. 573-91.
15. M. Pomerance, ‘Self-Determination Today: The Metamorphosis of an Ideal’ (1984) 19 Israel Law Review 310-339.
16. C. Schmitt, Verfassungslehre, 8. Auflage [1928] (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1993), pp. 75-6.
17. H. Lindahl, ‘Sovereignty and Representation in the European Union’, in N. Walker (ed.), Sovereignty in Transition (Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing, 2003), pp. 87-114.
18. N. Luhmann, A Sociological Theory of Law, E. King and M. Albrow (trans.) (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985), pp. 31-40.
19. T. Franck, ‘Clan and Superclan: Loyalty, Identity and Community in Law and Practice’ (1996) 90 AJIL 359-383.
20. J. Habermas, ‘Citizenship and National Identity’, in J. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, W. Rehg (trans.) (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1999), Appendix II, pp. 491-515,500.
21. A. Kojeve and F. Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man (London: Penguin, 1992), p. 143.
22. J. Crawford, The Creation of States in International Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006), pp. 434-48.
23. F. Kirgis, ‘Admission of ‘Palestine” as a Member of a Specialized Agency and Withholding the Payment of Assessments in Response’ (1990) 84 AJIL 218-230.
24. K. Hailbronner and E. Klein, in B. Simma (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations-A Commentary, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
25. Crawford, A. The Creation of States in International Law, 2nd ed, pp. 244-252.
26. Cassese, A. Self-Determination of Peoples, pp. 79-80, 34-6.
27. J. Shen, ‘Sovereignty, Statehood, Self-determination, and the Issue of Taiwan’ (2000) 15 American University International Law Review 1101-1161.
28. V. Epps,'self-Determination in the Taiwan/China Context’ (1998) 32 New England Law Review (New Eng L Rev) 685-693.
29. A. Hsiu-An Hsiao, ‘Is China's Policy to Use Force Against Taiwan a Violation of the Principle of Non-use of Force Under International Law?’ (1998) 32 New Eng Law Rev 715-742.
30. R. Heuser, ‘Taiwan und Selbstbestimmungsrecht’ (1980) 40 ZaoRV 31-75.
31. J. Charney,'self-Determination: Chechnya, Kosovo, and East Timor’ (2001) 34 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 455,462-4.
32. A. Skordas, ‘Just Peace Revisited: International Law in the Era of Asymmetry’, in: S. Stetter (ed.), Territorial Conflicts in World Society - Modern Systems Theory, International Relations and Conflict Studies (London: Routledge, 2007 (forthcoming)).
33. Crawford, A. The Creation of States in International Law, pp. 395-401.
34. T. Franck, ‘The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance’ (1992) 86 AJIL at 46-91.
35. G. Fox and B. Roth, Democratic Governance and International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).
36. L.-A. Sicilianos, L’ONU and la démocratisation de l’ Etat (Paris: Pedone, 2000).
37. B. Roth, Governmental Illegitimacy in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).
38. A. von Bogdandy, ‘Demokratie, Globalisierung, Zukunft des Völkerrechts - eine Bestandsaufnahme’ (2003) 63 ZaöRV 853-877.
39. N. Walker, ‘Late Sovereignty in the European Union’, in Walker (ed.), Sovereignty in Transition, pp. 3-32.
40. D. Sarooshi, International Organizations and Their Exercise of Sovereign Powers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).
41. K. Knop, Diversity and Self-Determination in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
42. N. Luhmann, Grundrechte als Institution, 3rd edn (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1986).
43. G. Verschraegen, ‘Human Rights and Modern Society: A Sociological Analysis from the Perspective of Systems Theory’ (2002) 29 JLS 258.
44. G. Teubner, ‘Global Private Regimes: Neo-Spontaneous Law and Dual Constitution of Autonomous Sectors?’, in K.-H. Ladeur (ed.), Public Governance in the Age of Globalization (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), p. 71-86.
45. K.-H. Ladeur, ‘Globalization and the Conversion of Democracy to Polycentric Networks: Can Democracy Survive the End of the Nation State?’, in Ladeur (ed.), Public Governance, p. 107.
46. J. Balkin, ‘Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society’, Yale Law School, Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Research Paper No. 63. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=470842 (last accessed 31 August, 2006).
47. K. -H. Ladeur, Negative Freiheitsrechte und gesellschaftliche Selbstorganisation - Die Erzeugung von Sozialkapital durch Institutionen (Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000).
48. E.-U. Petersmann, ‘Time for a United Nations “Global Compact” for Integrating Human Rights into the Law of Worldwide Organizations: Lessons from European Integration’ (2002) 13 EJIL 621-650.
49. G. Fox and G. Nolte, ‘Intolerant Democracies’ (1995) 36 HILJ 69-70.
50. K. Boyle, ‘Human Rights, Religion and Democracy: The Refah Party Case’ (2004) 1 Essex Human Rights Review 1-16.
51. ECt HR, Refah Partisi, para. 98.
52. G. Hafner, ‘Risks Ensuing from Fragmentation of International Law, ILC Report on the Work of its Fifty-second Session’, Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-fifth Session, Supplement No. 10 (A/55/10)
53. M. Koskenniemi, Global Legal Pluralism: Multiple Regimes and Multiple Modes of Thought, paper delivered at Harvard Law School, 5 March 2005 available at http//www.valt.helsinki.fi/blogs/eci/PluralismHarvard.pdf, p. 21.
54. M. Koskenniemi and P. Leino, ‘Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties’ (2002) 15 Leiden Journal of International Law (LJIL), 553-579.
55. N. Luhmann, ‘Die Weltgesellschaft’ (1971) 57 Archiv fUr Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie, 1-35.
56. N. Luhmann, Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp 1997), pp. 145-171, 806-12.
57. B. Fassbender, ‘The United Nations Charter As Constitution of The International Community’ (1998) 36 Columbia J Trans Law 529-619.
58. B. Fassbender, ‘Sovereignty and Constitutionalism in International Law’, in N. Walker (ed.), Sovereignty in Transition, pp. 115-143.
59. P.-M. Dupuy, ‘The Constitutional Dimension of the Charter of the United Nations Revisited’ (1997) 1 Max Planck UNYB 1-33.
60. J. Habermas, ‘Hat die Konstitutionalisierung des Völkerrechts noch eine Chance?’, in J. Habermas, Der gespaltene Westen (Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 2004), pp. 113-93.
61. G. Teubner, ‘Globale Zivilverfassungen: Alternativen zur staatszentrierten Verfassungstheorie’ (2003) 63 ZaöRV 1-28.
62. A. Fischer-Lescano and G. Teubner, ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’ (2004) 25 Michigan Journal of International Law 999-1046.
63. Fischer Lescano and Teubner, A. RegimeKollisionen
64. C. Walter, ‘Constitutionalizing (Inter)national Governance - Possibilities for and Limits to the Development of an International Constitutional Law’ (2001) 44 GYIL 170-201.
65. A. Fischer-Lescano, Die Globalverfassung (Weilerswist: Velbruck Wissenschaft, 2005);
66. A. Fischer-Lescano, ‘Die Emergenz der Globalverfassung’ (2003) 63 ZaöRV 717-760.
67. Joerges, Sand, and Teubner, A. Transnational Governance, pp. 29-39
68. I.-J. Sand, ‘Polycontextuality as an Alternative to Constitutionalism’, pp. 41-65.
69. T. Schweisfurth, ‘Die Verfassung Rußlands vom 12. Dezember 1993’ (1994) 21 Europäische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift (EuGRZ) 473-491.
70. N. Luhmann, ‘Die Weltgesellschaft’, reprinted in N. Luhmann, Soziologische Aufklärung 2, 1975, 51-71, 55.
71. N. Luhmann, Gesellschäftsstruktur und Semantik I, 2nd edn (Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp 1998), pp. 27-8.
72. H. Willke, Systemtheorie I -Grundlagen, 5th edn (Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius, 1996), p. 72.
73. G. Teubner, Recht als autopoietisches System(Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1989).
74. N. Walker, ‘Late Sovereignty in the European Union’
75. G. de Biirca, ‘Sovereignty and the Supremacy Doctrine of the European Court of Justice’
76. M. Poiares Maduro, ‘Contrapunctual Law: Europe's Constitutional Pluralism in Action’, in N. Walker, Sovereignty in Transition, pp. 3.
77. J. Shaw, ‘Process and Constitutional Discourse in the European Union’ (2000) 27 JLS 4-37.
78. E.-U. Petersmann, ‘The “Human Rights Approach” Advocated by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and by the International Labour Organization: Is it Relevant for WTO Law and Policy?’ (2004) 7 Journal of International Economic Law (JIEL) 605,621-3.
79. E.-U. Petersmann, ‘Challenges to the Legitimacy and Efficiency of the World Trading System: Democratic Governance and Competition Culture in the WTO’ (2004) 7 JIEL 583-603.
80. D. Cass, The Constitutionalization of the World Trade Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).
81. Fischer Lescano and Teubner, A. Regime-Kollisionen
82. J. Dunoff, ‘Constitutional Conceits: The WTO's “Constitution” and the Discipline of International Law’ (2006) 17 EJIL 647-675.
83. Lindahl, A. ‘Sovereignty and Representation’ at 105-114.
84. J. H. H. Weiler, ‘Does Europe Need a Constitution? Demos, Telos and the German Maastricht Decision’ (1995) 1 ELJ 219-257.
85. A. Skordas, ‘Is Europe an “Aging Power” with Global Vision? A Tale on Constitutionalism and Restoration’ (Review Essay) (2005) 12 Col JEL 241-291.
86. C. Joerges, ‘On the Disregard for History in the Convention Process’ (2006) 12 ELJ2-5;
87. G. de BUrca, ‘After the Referenda’, 6.
88. M. Poiares Maduro, ‘Contrapunctual Law’ 501,535-6;
89. K.-H. Ladeur, ‘Globalization and the Conversion of Democracy’ at 117-118.
90. J. H. H. Weiler, The Constitution of Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).
91. H. Lindahl, ‘Sovereignty and Representation’ at 87-114.
92. R. Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984), pp. 143-4, 147-9.
93. J. G. Ruggie, ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’ (1982) 36 International Organization 379, 393-415.
94. J. Croome, Reshaping the World Trading System - A History of the Uruguay Round (Geneva, WTO 1995), pp. 323-7.
95. N. Luhmann, Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft, 2nd edn (Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1996).
96. Cf. D. McRae, ‘The WTO in International Law: Tradition Continued or New Frontier?’ (2000) 3 JIEL 27-41.
97. M. Matshushita, T. Schoenbaum and P. Mavroidis, The World Trade Organization -Law, Practice and Policy, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 763-84.
98. R. Steinberg, ‘Judicial Lawmaking at the WTO: Discursive, Constitutional and Political Constraints’ (2004) 98 AJIL 262.
99. Cf. Matshushita, Schoenbaum, A. and Mavroidis, A. The World Trade Organization, pp. 33-37.
100. Cf. J. Dunoff, ‘The Death of the Trade Regime’ (1999) 10 EJIL 733-757.
101. E. O. Eriksen and J. E. Fossum, ‘Europe at Crossroads: Government or Transnational Governance?’, in Joerges, Sand, and Teubner, Transnational Governance, pp. 125-127.
102. Cf. A. Herwig, ‘Transnational Governance Regimes for Foods Derived from BioTechnology and their Legitimacy’, pp. 199-222.
103. P. Nanz, ‘Legitimation of Transnational Governance Regimes and Foodstuff Regulation at the WTO: Comments on Alexia Herwig’ pp. 223-231.
104. G. Umbricht, ‘An “Amicus Curiae Brief’ on Amicus Curiae Briefs at the WTO’ (2001) 4 JIEL, 773-794.
105. Matshushita, A., Schoenbaum, A. and Mavroidis, A. The World Trade Organization, pp. 124-125.
106. D. Esty, ‘Non-Governmental Organizations at the World Trade Organization: Cooperation, Competition, or Exclusion’ (1998) 1 JIEL 123-147.
107. Matshushita, A. Schoenbaum, A. and Mavroidis, A. The World Trade Organization, p. 114.
108. P. Mavroidis and W. Zdouc, ‘Legal Means to Protect Private Parties’ Interests in the WTO’ (1998) 1 JIEL International Economic Law 407-433.
109. J. Dunoff, ‘The Misguided Debate Over NGO Participation at the WTO’ (1998) 1 JIEL 433,441-51
110. G. Schleyer, ‘Power to the People: Allowing Private Parties to Raise Claims Before the WTO Dispute Resolution System’ (1997) 65 Fordham Law Review 2275-2311.
111. V. Lowe, ‘Jurisdiction’ in M. Evans (ed.), International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 336-9.
112. Fischer Lescano and Teubner, A. ‘Regime-Collisions’ at 1005-1007.
113. V. Karavas, ‘Digitale Grundrechte: Zur Drittwirkung der Grundrechte im Internet’, Dissertation Frankfurt/Main, 2005.
114. C. Walter, ‘Constitutionalizing (Inter)national Governance’ at 196-201
115. E.-U. Petersmann, ‘The WTO Constitution and Human Rights’ (2000) 3 JIEL 19-25.
116. G. Teubner, ‘The Anonymous Matrix: Human Rights Violations by “Private” Transnational Actors’, (2006) 69 MLR 327-346.
117. A. V. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, with an introduction by E. C. S. Wade, 10th edn (London: Macmillan, 1962, first published in 1885), pp. 3, 206-7.