Sovereignty and Representation in the European Union

Sovereignty in Transition

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 87-114

  Lindahl, Hans ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85190006820     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. G Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, translated by D Heller-Roazen (Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1998), 30 ff.
2. H Blumenberg, ‘Ordnungsschwund und Selbstbehauptung: Über Weltverstehen und Weltverhalten im Werden der technischen Epoche’ in H Kuhn and F Wiedman (eds.), Das Problem der Ordnung (Meisenheim, Anton Hain Verlag, 1962), 37–55.
3. H Blumenberg, The Legitimacy of the Modern Age, translated by RM Wallace (Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press, 1986).
4. J Cohen and C Sabel, ‘Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy’, 3 (1997) European Law Journal, 313–42, at 313.
5. O Gerstenberg, ‘Law’s Polyarchy: A Comment on Cohen and Sabel’ in 3 (1997) European Law Journal, 343–58, at 357.
6. J Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, translated by W Rehg (Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press, 1996), at 107.
7. B van Roermund, Law, Narrative and Reality: An Essay in Intercepting Politics (Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997), at 151.
8. A Schütz, Reflections on the Problem of Relevance, translated by RM Zaner (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1970).
9. H-G Gadamer, ‘Und dennoch: Macht des Guten Willens’ in P Forget (ed.), Text und Interpretation: Deutsch-französische Debatte (München, Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1984), 59–61, at 59.
10. D Grimm, ‘Does Europe Need a Constitution?’, 1 (1995) European Law Journal, 282–302, at 289.
11. J Habermas, ‘Remarks on Dieter Grimm’s “Does Europe Need a Constitution?”’, 1 (1995) European Law Journal, 303–07, at 305.
12. C Lefort, Democracy and Political Theory, translated by D Macey (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1988), at 225.
13. G Marks, L Hooghe, and K Blank, ‘European Integration from the 1980s: State-Centric v. Multi-level Governance’, 34 (1996) Journal of Common Market Studies, 341–78.
14. D Plotke, ‘Representation Is Democracy’, 4 (1997) Constellations, 19–34, at 33.
15. C Joerges, ‘ “Good Governance” Through Comitology?’ in C Joerges and E Vos (eds.), EU Committees: Social Regulation, Law and Politics (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1999), 310–38.
16. J Derrida, Speech and Phenomena and Other Essays on Husserl’s Theory of Signs, translated by DB Allison (Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 1973), at 104.
17. H Lindahl and B van Roermund, ‘Law without a State? On Representing the Common Market’ in Z Bankowski and A Scott (eds.), The European Union and Its Order: The Legal Theory of European Integration (Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 2000), 1–16.
18. SJ Boom, ‘The European Union after the Maastricht Decision: Will Germany Be the “Virginia of Europe”?’, 43 (1995) American Journal of Comparative Law, 177–226, at 209.
19. B Waldenfels, Topographie des Fremden: Studien zur Phänomenologie des Fremden (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1997), at 149
20. J Derrida, Force de loi: Le ‘Fondement mystique de l’autorité’ (Paris, Galilée, 1994), esp. 32–34, 83 ff.