Change management choices and trajectories in a multidivisional firm

British Journal of Management

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 7-27

  Stensaker, Inger G ^b   Langley, Ann ^a  

^a HEC MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649326893     PISSN: 10453172     EISSN: 14678551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00657.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Balogun J. From blaming the middle to harnessing its potential: creating change intermediaries. British Journal of Management 2003, 14:69-83. pp
2. Balogun J, Johnson G. From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: the impact of change recipient sensemaking. Organization Studies 2005, 26:1573-1601. pp
3. Bartunek J. Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: the example of a religious order. Administrative Science Quarterly 1984, 29:355-372. pp
4. Bate P, Khan R, Pye A. Towards a culturally sensitive approach to organization structuring: where organization design meets organization development. Organization Science 2000, 11:197-211. pp
5. Beer M, Nohria N. Breaking the Code of Change 2000, Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press
6. Beer M, Eisenstat R E, Spector B. Why change programmes don't produce change. Harvard Business Review 1990, 68:158-166. pp
7. Bjorkman I, Lervik J E. Transferring HR practices within multinational corporations. Human Resource Management Journal 2007, 17:320-335. pp
8. Bryson J M, Bromiley P. Critical factors affecting the planning and implementation of major projects. Strategic Management Journal 1993, 14:319-337. pp
9. Buchanan D A. The logic of political action: an experiment with the epistemology of the particular. British Journal of Management 1999, 10:73-88. pp
10. Buchanan D, Boddy D. The Expertise of the Change Agent: Public Performance and Backstage Activity 1992, London, Prentice Hall International
11. Burnes B. Managing Change: A Strategic Approach to Organizational Dynamics 2004, London, Prentice Hall
12. Caldwell R. Models of change agency: a fourfold classification. British Journal of Management 2003, 14:131-142. pp
13. Dawson P. Organizational Change: A Processual Approach 1994, London, Paul Chapman
14. Denis J-L, Lamothe L, Langley A. The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations. Academy of Management Journal 2001, 44:809-837. pp
15. Dunford R. Discussion note: Strategies for planned change. An exchange of views between Dunford, Dunphy and Stace. Organization Studies 1990, 11:131-135. pp
16. Dunphy D C, Stace D A. Transformational and coercive strategies for planned organizational change: beyond the OD model. Organizational Studies 1988, 9:339-355. pp
17. Dunphy D C, Stace D A. The strategic management of corporate change. Human Relations 1993, 46:905-920. pp
18. Elsbach K D, Sutton R I. Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions - a marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal 1992, 35:699-738. pp
19. Giddens A. The Constitution of Society 1984, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press
20. Guha S, Grover V, Kettinger W J, Teng J T C. Business process change and organizational performance: exploring an antecedent model. Journal of Management Information Systems 1997, 14:119-154. pp
21. Hardy C. The nature of unobtrusive power. Journal of Management Studies 1985, 22:384-399. pp
22. Hardy C. Managing strategic change: power, paralysis and perspective. Advances in Strategic Management 1995, 12:3-30. pp
23. Hinings C R, Greenwood R. The Dynamics of Strategic Change 1988, Oxford, Basil Blackwell
24. Huy Q N. Time, temporal capability and planned change. Academy of Management Review 2001, 26:601-623. pp
25. Huy Q N. Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: the contribution of middle managers. Administrative Science Quarterly 2002, 47:31-69. pp
26. Jian G. Unpacking unintended consequences in planned organizational change: a process model. Management Communication Quarterly 2007, 21:5-28. pp
27. Kostova T, Roth K. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal 2002, 45:215-233. pp
28. Kotter J P. Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review 1995, 73:59-67. pp
29. Langley A. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review 1999, 24:691-710. pp
30. Lewin K. Frontiers in group dynamics. Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers by Kurt Lewin 1947, Cartwright D. In, (ed.), Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press
31. Mantere S. Role expectations and middle manager strategic agency. Journal of Management Studies 2007, 45:294-316. pp
32. Maxwell J A. Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review 1992, 62:279-300. pp
33. Molinsky A L. Sanding down the edges: paradoxical impediments to organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 1999, 35:8-24. pp
34. Nutt P. Tactics of implementation. Academy of Management Journal 1986, 29:230-261. pp
35. Orlikowski W J, Hoffman D J. An improvisational model for change management: the case of Groupware Technologies. Sloan Management Review 1997, 38:11-21. pp
36. Pettigrew A M. The Awakening Giant 1985, Oxford, Basil Blackwell
37. Pfeffer J, Salancik G R. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective 1978, New York, Harper & Row
38. Storey J. Developments in the Management of Human Resources 1992, Oxford, Blackwell
39. Waldersee R, Griffiths A. Implementing change: matching implementation methods and change type. Leadership and Organization Development Journal 2004, 25:424-434. pp