Can computers help overcome limitations in human decision making?

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 26, Issue 2-3, 2010, Pages 108-119

  Maule, A John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED; DECISION MAKERS; DECISION SUPPORTS; HUMAN DECISION MAKING; HUMAN THINKING; PROCESSING CAPACITIES;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 77649286245     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: 15327590     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10447310903498684     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arkes, H. R. (1991). Costs and benefits of judgment errors: implications for debiasing. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 486-498.
2. Baddeley, A. D. (2004). Your memory: A user's guide. London: Carlton.
3. Bazerman, M. H., & Moore, D. (2009). Judgment in managerial decision making. Hoboken NJ: Wiley.
4. Broder, A., & Schiffer, S. (2003). Take-the-best versus simultaneous feature matching: probabilistic inferences from memory and the effects of representation format. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 277-293.
5. Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Ross, M. (2002). Inside the planning fallacy: The causes and consequences of optimistic time predictions. In T. D. Gilovich, D. W. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 250-270). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668-1674.
7. Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 311, 1005-1007.
8. Edwards, W. (1954). The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 380-417.
9. French, S., Maule, A. J., & Papamichail N. (2009). Decision behaviour, analysis and support. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1999). Betting on one good reason: The take the best heuristic. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 75-95). New York, Oxford University Press.
11. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & ABC Research Group (Eds.). (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Hertwig, R., & Todd P. M. (2003). More is not always better: The benefits of cognitive limits. In D. Hardman & L. Macchi (Eds.), Thinking: Psychological perspectives on reasoning, judgment and decision making (pp. 213-231). Chichester, UK: Wiley and Sons.
13. Hodgkinson, G. P., Bown, N. J., Maule, A. J., Glaister, K. W., & Pearman A. D. (1999). Breaking the frame: An analysis of strategic choice and decision making under uncertainty. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10), 977-985.
14. Hogarth, R. M. (1980). Judgement and choice. Chichester, UK: Wiley and Sons.
15. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. D. Gilovich, D. W. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 49-81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
17. Klayman, J., & Ha, Y-W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211-228.
18. Klein, M. R., & Methlie, L. B. (1995). Knowledge-based decision support systems. Chichester, UK: Wiley and Sons.
19. Koehler, D. (1991). Explanation, imagination and confidence in judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 499-519.
20. Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1980). Reasons for overconfidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 107-118.
21. Larrick, R. P. (2004). Debiasing. In D. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 316-337). New York: Blackwell.
22. Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic P. (1971). Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89(1), 46-55.
23. Lovallo, D. P., & Kahneman, D. (2003). Delusion of success. Harvard Business Review, 81, 57-63.
24. MacCrimmon, K. R. (1968). Descriptive and normative implications of the decision theory postulates. In K. H. Borch & J. Mossin (Eds.), Risk and uncertainty (pp. 3-23). London: Macmillan.
25. Maule, A. J. (1989). Positive and negative decision frames: A verbal protocol analysis of the Asian disease problem of Kahneman and Tversky. In O. Svenson & H. Montgomery (Eds.), Process and structure in human decision making (pp. 163-180). Chichester, UK: Wiley and Sons.
26. Maule, A. J., & Villejoubert, G. (2007). What lies beneath: Reframing framing effects. Thinking and Reasoning, 13(1), 25-44.
27. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
28. Mussweiler, T. F., & Pfeiffer, T. (2000). Overcoming the inevitable anchoring effect: considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1142-1150.
29. Phillips, L. D. (1984). A theory of requisite decision models. Acta Psychologica, 56(1-3), 29-48.
30. Pliske, R., & Klein, G. (2002). The naturalistic decision making perspective. In S. L. Schneider & J Shanteau (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research (pp. 559-585). New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York: Harper Collins.
32. Simon, H. A. (1960). The new science of management decision. New York: Harper and Row.
33. Slovic, P. (1995). The construction of preference. American Psychologist, 50, 364-371.
34. Slovic, P., Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1990). Compatibility effects in judgment and choice. In R. Hogarth (Eds.), Insights in decision making: Theory and applications (pp. 5-27). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
35. Soll, J. B., & Klayman, J. (2004). Overconfidence in interval estimates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30(2), 299-314.
36. Wedell, D. H., & Bockenholt, U. (1998). Moderation of preference reversals in the long run. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(2), 429-438.