Genome-wide analysis of mRNA targets for Caenorhabditis elegans FBF, a conserved stem cell regulator

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 107, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 3936-3941

  Kershner, Aaron M ^a   Kimble, Judith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Germline stem cell; PUF; RIP Chip; Totipotency

Indexed keywords

FBF PROTEIN; MESSENGER RNA; PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENE TARGETING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HUMAN; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; MEIOSIS; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; TOTIPOTENT STEM CELL;

ANIMALS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEINS; DROSOPHILA; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENES, HELMINTH; HUMANS; RNA, MESSENGER; RNA-BINDING PROTEINS; STEM CELLS;

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS;

EID: 77649264236     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1000495107     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Jaenisch R, Young R (2008) Stem cells, the molecular circuitry of pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Cell 132:567-582.
2. Wickens M, Bernstein DS, Kimble J, Parker R (2002) A PUF family portrait: 3?UTR regulation as a way of life. Trends Genet 18:150-157.
3. Lin H, Spradling AC (1997) A novel group of pumilio mutations affects the asymmetric division of germline stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Development 124:2463-2476.
4. Crittenden SL, et al. (2002) A conserved RNA-binding protein controls germline stem cells in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 417:660-663.
5. Salvetti A, et al. (2005) DjPum, a homologue of Drosophila Pumilio, is essential to planarian stem cell maintenance. Development 132:1863-1874.
6. Moore FL, et al. (2003) Human Pumilio-2 is expressed in embryonic stem cells and germ cells and interacts with DAZ (Deleted in AZoospermia) and DAZ-like proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:538-543.
7. Xu EY, Chang R, Salmon NA, Reijo Pera RA (2007) A gene trap mutation of a murine homolog of the Drosophila stem cell factor Pumilio results in smaller testes but does not affect litter size or fertility. Mol Reprod Dev 74:912-921.
8. Lehmann R, Nüsslein-Volhard C (1991) The maternal gene nanos has a central role in posterior pattern formation of the Drosophila embryo. Development 112:679-691.
9. Schweers BA, Walters KJ, Stern M (2002) The Drosophila melanogaster translational repressor pumilio regulates neuronal excitability. Genetics 161:1177-1185.
10. Kaye JA, Rose NC, Goldsworthy B, Goga A, L'Etoile ND (2009) A 3?UTR Pumilio-binding element directs translational activation in olfactory sensory neurons. Neuron 61:57-70.
11. Dubnau J, et al. (2003) The staufen/pumilio pathway is involved in Drosophila longterm memory. Curr Biol 13:286-296.
12. Archer SK, Luu VD, de Queiroz RA, Brems S, Clayton C (2009) Trypanosoma brucei PUF9 regulates mRNAs for proteins involved in replicative processes over the cell cycle. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000565.
13. Suh N, et al. (2009) FBF and its dual control of gld-1 expression in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline. Genetics 181:1249-1260.
14. Gerber AP, Herschlag D, Brown PO (2004) Extensive association of functionally and cytotopically related mRNAs with Puf family RNA-binding proteins in yeast. PLoS Biol 2:E79.
15. Gerber AP, Luschnig S, Krasnow MA, Brown PO, Herschlag D (2006) Genome-wide identification of mRNAs associated with the translational regulator PUMILIO in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:4487-4492.
16. Galgano A, et al. (2008) Comparative analysis of mRNA targets for human PUF-family proteins suggests extensive interaction with the miRNA regulatory system. PLoS One 3:e3164.
17. Morris AR, Mukherjee N, Keene JD (2008) Ribonomic analysis of human Pum1 reveals cis-trans conservation across species despite evolution of diverse mRNA target sets. Mol Cell Biol 28:4093-4103.
18. Zhang B, et al. (1997) A conserved RNA-binding protein that regulates sexual fates in the C. elegans hermaphrodite germ line. Nature 390:477-484.
19. Lamont LB, Crittenden SL, Bernstein D, Wickens M, Kimble J (2004) FBF-1 and FBF-2 regulate the size of the mitotic region in the C. elegans germline. Dev Cell 7:697-707.
20. Kimble J, Crittenden SL (2007) Controls of germline stem cells, entry into meiosis, and the sperm/oocyte decision in Caenorhabditis elegans. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 23:405-433.
21. Lublin AL, Evans TC (2007) The RNA-binding proteins PUF-5, PUF-6, and PUF-7 reveal multiple systems for maternal mRNA regulation during C. elegans oogenesis. Dev Biol 303:635-649.
22. Noble SL, Allen BL, Goh LK, Nordick K, Evans TC (2008) Maternal mRNAs are regulated by diverse P body-related mRNP granules during early Caenorhabditis elegans development. J Cell Biol 182:559-572.
23. Francis R, Barton MK, Kimble J, Schedl T (1995) gld-1, a tumor suppressor gene required for oocyte development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 139:579-606.
24. Kadyk LC, Kimble J (1998) Genetic regulation of entry into meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 125:1803-1813.
25. Merritt C, Rasoloson D, Ko D, Seydoux G (2008) 3′ UTRs are the primary regulators of gene expression in the C. elegans germline. Curr Biol 18:1476-1482.
26. Lee M-H, et al. (2007) Conserved regulation of MAP kinase expression by PUF RNAbinding proteins. PLoS Genet 3:e233.
27. Lee M-H, et al. (2007) Multiple functions and dynamic activation of MPK-1 extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans germline development. Genetics 177:2039-2062.
28. Sundaram MV (February 11, 2006) RTK/Ras/MAPK signaling. WormBook, 10.1895/wormbook.1.80.1.
29. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G (2001) Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:5116-5121.
30. Chang YF, Imam JS, Wilkinson MF (2007) The nonsense-mediated decay RNA surveillance pathway. Annu Rev Biochem 76:51-74.
31. Thompson BE, et al. (2005) Dose-dependent control of proliferation and sperm specification by FOG-1/CPEB. Development 132:3471-3481.
32. Thompson BE, Lamont LB, Kimble J (2006) Germ-line induction of the Caenorhabditis elegans vulva. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:620-625.
33. Bernstein D, Hook B, Hajarnavis A, Opperman L, Wickens M (2005) Binding specificity and mRNA targets of a C. elegans PUF protein, FBF-1. RNA 11:447-458.
34. Muraro NI, et al. (2008) Pumilio binds para mRNA and requires Nanos and Brat to regulate sodium current in Drosophila motoneurons. J Neurosci 28:2099-2109.
35. Mili S, Steitz JA (2004) Evidence for reassociation of RNA-binding proteins after cell lysis: Implications for the interpretation of immunoprecipitation analyses. RNA 10:1692-1694.
36. McKay RM, McKay JP, Avery L, Graff JM (2003) C. elegans: A model for exploring the genetics of fat storage. Dev Cell 4:131-142.
37. Jantsch V, et al. (2007) Caenorhabditis elegans prom-1 is required for meiotic prophase progression and homologous chromosome pairing. Mol Biol Cell 18:4911-4920.
38. Zetka MC, Kawasaki I, Strome S, Müller F (1999) Synapsis and chiasma formation in Caenorhabditis elegans require HIM-3, a meiotic chromosome core component that functions in chromosome segregation. Genes Dev 13:2258-2270.
39. Takanami T, et al. (1998) Characterization of a Caenorhabditis elegans recA-like gene Ce-rdh-1 involved in meiotic recombination. DNA Res 5:373-377.
40. Colaiácovo MP, et al. (2002) A targeted RNAi screen for genes involved in chromosome morphogenesis and nuclear organization in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline. Genetics 162:113-128.
41. Canevascini S, Marti M, Fröhli E, Hajnal A (2005) The Caenorhabditis elegans homologue of the proto-oncogene ect-2 positively regulates RAS signalling during vulval development. EMBO Rep 6:1169-1175.
42. Kritikou EA, et al. (2006) C. elegans GLA-3 is a novel component of the MAP kinase MPK-1 signaling pathway required for germ cell survival. Genes Dev 20:2279-2292.
43. Conradt B, Xue D (October 6, 2005) Programmed cell death. WormBook, 10.1895/wormbook.1.32.1.
44. Ellis HM, Horvitz HR (1986) Genetic control of programmed cell death in the nematode C. elegans. Cell 44:817-829.
45. Conradt B, Horvitz HR (1998) The C. elegans protein EGL-1 is required for programmed cell death and interacts with the Bcl-2-like protein CED-9. Cell 93:519-529.
46. Kim KW, et al. (2009) Antagonism between GLD-2 binding partners controls gamete sex. Dev Cell 16:723-733.
47. Grishok A, et al. (2001) Genes and mechanisms related to RNA interference regulate expression of the small temporal RNAs that control C. elegans developmental timing. Cell 106:23-34.
48. Kenyon C, Chang J, Gensch E, Rudner A, Tabtiang R (1993) A C. elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type. Nature 366:461-464.
49. van den Heuvel S (September 21, 2005) Cell-cycle regulation. WormBook, 10.1895/ wormbook.1.28.1.
50. Dreesen O, Brivanlou AH (2007) Signaling pathways in cancer and embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Rev 3:7-17.
51. Boyer LA, et al. (2005) Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 122:947-956.
52. Pasini D, Bracken AP, Hansen JB, Capillo M, Helin K (2007) The Polycomb group protein Suz12 is required for embryonic stem cell differentiation. Mol Cell Biol 27:3769-3779.
53. Schwartz YB, Pirrotta V (2007) Polycomb silencing mechanisms and the management of genomic programmes. Nat Rev Genet 8:9-22.
54. Boyer LA, et al. (2006) Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 441:349-353.
55. Lee TI, et al. (2006) Control of developmental regulators by Polycomb in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 125:301-313.
56. Eckmann CR, Crittenden SL, Suh N, Kimble J (2004) GLD-3 and control of the mitosis/meiosis decision in the germline of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 168:147-160.
57. Hansen D, Wilson-Berry L, Dang T, Schedl T (2004) Control of the proliferation versus meiotic development decision in the C. elegans germline through regulation of GLD-1 protein accumulation. Development 131:93-104.
58. Burdon T, Stracey C, Chambers I, Nichols J, Smith A (1999) Suppression of SHP-2 and ERK signalling promotes self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells. Dev Biol 210:30-43.
59. Torres J, Watt FM (2008) Nanog maintains pluripotency of mouse embryonic stem cells by inhibiting NFκB and cooperating with Stat3. Nat Cell Biol 10:194-201.
60. Yu X, et al. (2008) Notch signaling activation in human embryonic stem cells is required for embryonic, but not trophoblastic, lineage commitment. Cell Stem Cell 2:461-471.
61. Androutsellis-Theotokis A, et al. (2006) Notch signalling regulates stem cell numbers in vitro and in vivo. Nature 442:823-826.
62. Woo SM, et al. (2009) Notch signaling is required for maintaining stem-cell features of neuroprogenitor cells derived from human embryonic stem cells. BMC Neurosci 10:97.
63. Paling NR, Wheadon H, Bone HK, Welham MJ (2004) Regulation of embryonic stem cell self-renewal by phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent signaling. J Biol Chem 279:48063-48070.
64. Miyamoto K, et al. (2007) Foxo3a is essential for maintenance of the hematopoietic stem cell pool. Cell Stem Cell 1:101-112.
65. Prinz S, Aldridge C, Ramsey SA, Taylor RJ, Galitski T (2007) Control of signaling in a MAP-kinase pathway by an RNA-binding protein. PLoS One 2:e249.
66. Praitis V, Casey E, Collar D, Austin J (2001) Creation of low-copy integrated transgenic lines in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 157:1217-1226.
67. Dennis G, Jr, et al. (2003) DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol 4:P3.
68. Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4:44-57.