Building and using habitat models for assessing temporal changes in forest ecosystems

Temporal Dimensions of Landscape Ecology: Wildlife Responses to Variable Resources

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 195-217

  Felix, Alexandra B ^a   Linden, Daniel W ^a   Campa Iii, Henry ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649226969     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-45447-4_12     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Agee, J.K. 2000. Disturbance ecology of North American boreal forests and associated northern mixed/subalpine forests. Pages 39-82 in Ruggiero, L.F., Aubry, K.B., Buskirk, S.W., Koehler, G.M., Krebs, C.J., McKelvey, K.S., and Squires, J.R., eds. Ecology and Conservation of Lynx in the United States. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
2. Albert, D.A. 1995. Regional Landscape Ecosystems of Michigan, Minnesota, andWisconsin: A working map and classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station GTR-NC-178. St. Paul, MN.
3. Bailey, R.G. 1976. Ecoregions of the United States. Map (scale 1:7,500,000). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Region. Ogden, UT.
4. Bailey, R.G. 1980. Descriptions of the Ecoregions of the United States. Miscellaneous Publication 1391. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
5. Bailey, R.G.,Avers, P.E., King, T., and McNab,W.H., eds. 1994. Ecoregions and Subregions of the United States. Map (scale 1:7,500,000). Washington, DC: U.S Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
6. Beyer, D.E., Jr., Roell, B., Hammill, J., and Earle, R. 2001. Records of Canada lynx in Michigan's Upper Peninsula. Canadian Field Naturalist 115:234-240.
7. Brand, C.J., Keith, L.B., and Fischer, C.A. 1976. Lynx responses to changing snowshoe hare densities in Alberta. Journal of Wildlife Management 40:416-428.
8. Brinkman, K.A., and Roe, E.I. 1975. Quaking Aspen: Silvics and Management in the Lake States. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 486. Washington, DC.
9. Burger, T.L., and Kotar, J. 1999. Field Guide to Forest Habitat Types of Northern Lower Michigan. Madison WI: Department of Forest Ecology and Management, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
10. Buskirk, S.W., Ruggiero, L.F., Aubry, K.B., Pearson, D.E., Squires, J.R., and McKelvey, K.S. 2000. Comparative ecology of lynx in North America. Pages 397-418 in Ruggiero, L.F., Aubry, K.B., Buskirk,S.W.,Koehler, G.M., Krebs, C.J.,McKelvey, K.S., and Squires J.R., eds. Ecology and Conservation of Lynx in the United States. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
11. Campbell, J.B. 1987. Introduction to Remote Sensing. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12. Cleland, D.T., Avers, P.E., McNab,W.H., Jensen, M.E., Bailey, R.G., King, T., and Russell, W.E. 1997. National Hierarchical Framework of Ecological Units. Pages 181-200 in Boyce, M.S., and Haney, A., eds. Ecosystem Management Applications for Sustainable Forest and Wildlife Resources. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
13. Cleland, D.T., Crow, T.R., Saunders, S.C., Dickmann, D.I., Maclean, A.L., Jordan, J.K., Watson, R.L., Sloan, A.M., and Brosofske, K.D. 2004. Characterizing historical and modern fire regimes in Michigan (USA): A landscape ecosystem approach. Landscape Ecology 19:311-325.
14. Cleland, D.T., Hart, J.B., Pregitzer, K.S., and Ramm,C.W. 1985. Classifying oak ecosystems for management. Pages 120-134 in Johnson, J.E., ed. Proceedings of Challenges for Oak Management and Utilization, March 28-29. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
15. Coffman, M.S., Alyanak, E., and Ferris, J. 1980. Field Guide to Habitat Type Classification System for Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Houghton, MI: School of Forestry and Wood Products, Michigan Technological University.
16. Crawford, B.T. 1950. Some specific relationships between soils and wildlife. Journal of Wildlife Management 14:115-121.
17. Daubenmire, R. 1966. Vegetation: Identification of typal communities. Science 151:291-298.
18. Daubenmire, R. 1968. Ecology of fire in grasslands. Pages 209-266 in Cragg, J.B., ed. Advances in Ecological Research. Volume 5. New York, NY: Academic Press.
19. Davis, L.S., Johnson, K.N., Bettinger, P.S., and Howard, T.E. 2001. Forest Management. Fourth Edition. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
20. Felix, A.B. 2003. Development of landscape-scale models to describe habitat potential of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in Michigan. M. S. Thesis. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
21. Felix, A.B., Campa, H. III, Millenbah, K.F., Winterstein, S.R., and Moritz, W.E. 2004. Development of landscape-scale habitat-potential models for forest wildlife planning and management. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32:795-806.
22. Fox, J.F. 1978. Forest fires and the snowshoe hare-Canada lynx cycle. Oecologia 31:349-374.
23. Franco-Lopez, H., Ek, A.R., and Bauer, M.E. 2001. Estimation and mapping of forest stand density, volume, and cover type using the k-nearest neighbors method. Remote Sensing of Environment 77:251-274.
24. Glenn, E.M., and Ripple,W.J. 2004.Onusing digital maps to assess wildlife habitat.Wildlife Society Bulletin 32:852-860.
25. Graham, S.A., Harrison, R.P. Jr., and Westell, C.E. Jr. 1963. Aspens, Phoenix Trees of the Great Lakes Region. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
26. Gustafson, E.J., and Rasmussen, C.V. 2002. HARVEST for Windows. Timber Harvest Simulation Model Version 6.0. Rhinelander WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station.
27. Harger, E.M. 1965. The status of the Canada lynx in Michigan. The Jack-Pine Warbler 43:150-153.
28. Hart, J.H., Hart, J.B., and Nguyen, P.V. 1986. Aspen mortality following sludge application in Michigan. Pages 266-271 in Cole, D.W., Henry, C.L., and Nutter,W.L., eds. The Forest Alternative for Treatment and Utilization of Municipal and Industrial Wastes. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
29. Haufler, J.B., Mehl, C.A., and Roloff, G.J. 1996. Using a coarse-filter approach with species assessment for ecosystem management. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24:200-208.
30. Hodges, K.E. 2000. Ecology of snowshoe hares in southern boreal and montane forests. Pages 163-206 in Ruggiero, L.F., Aubry, K.B., Buskirk, S.W., Koehler, G.M., Krebs, C.J., McKelvey, K.S., and Squires, J.R., eds. Ecology and Conservation of Lynx in the United States. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Press.
31. Keith, L.B. 1963.Wildlife's Ten-Year Cycle. Madison, WI: University ofWisconsin Press.
32. Keith, L.B., Bloomer, S.E.M., and Willebrand, T. 1993. Dynamics of a snowshoe hare population in fragmented habitat. Canadian Journal of Zoology 71:1385-1392.
33. Kessler,W.B., Salwasser, H., Cartwright, C.W. Jr., and Caplan, J.A. 1992. New perspectives for sustainable natural resources management. Ecological Applications 2: 221-225.
34. Koehler, G.M., and Aubry, K.B. 1994. Lynx. Pages 74-98 in Ruggiero, L.F., Aubry, K.B., Buskirk, S.W., Lyon, L.J., and Zielinski, W.J., eds. The Scientific Basis for Conserving Forest Carnivores: American Marten, Fisher, Lynx, andWolverine. Fort Collins, CO: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service GTR-RM-254.
35. Kotar, J., and Burger, T.L. 2000. Field Guide to Forest Habitat Type Classification for North Central Minnesota. Madison, WI: Terra Silva Consultants.
36. Mallinis, G., Koutsias, N., Makras, A., and Karteris, M. 2004. Forest parameters estimation in a European Mediterranean landscape using remotely sensed data. Forest Science 50:450-460.
37. Maxwell, J.R., Edwards, C.J., Jensen, M.E., Paustian, S.J., Parrott, H., and Hill, D.M. 1995. A Hierarchical Framework of Aquatic Ecological Units in North America (Neararctic Zone). General Technical Report NC-176. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, St. Paul, MN.
38. McKelvey, K.S., Aubrey, K.B., and Ortega, Y.K. 2000. History and distribution of lynx in the contiguous United States. Pages 207-264 in Ruggiero, L.F., Aubry, K.B., Buskirk, S.W., Koehler, G.M., Krebs, C.J., McKelvey, K.S., and Squires, J.R., eds. Ecology and Conservation of Lynx in the United States. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
39. McNab,W.H., andAvers, P.E. 1994. Ecological Subregions of the United States: Section descriptions. Administrative Publication WO-WSA-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
40. McShea, W.J., Underwood, H.B., and Rappole, J.H. 1997. Deer management and the concept of overabundance. Pages 1-10 in McShea, W.J., Underwood, H.B., and Rappole, J.H., eds. The Science of Overabundance: Deer Ecology and Population Management. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute Press.
41. Michigan Department of Conservation. 1938. Ninth biennial report. Lansing, Michigan.
42. Michigan Department of Natural Resources. 2003. IFMAP/GAP Upper Peninsula Land Cover [map]. 1997-2001. 1:64,000; created by Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division, MDNRusing ERDAS Imagine 8.5. http://www.dnr.state.mi.us/ spatialdatalibrary/ sdl2/land use cover/2001/IFMAP up landcover.htm (1 April 2003).
43. Michigan Natural Features Inventory. 1999. Michigan's presettlement vegetation, as interpreted from the General Land Office Surveys 1816-1856 [map]. 1:100,000; generated by Michael B. Austin, Cathy J. DeLain, Kraig M. Korroch, Teresa R. Leibfried, Laurie Prange-Gregory, Lyn J. Scrimger, and John G. Spitzley; using ARC/INFO 7.2.1. http://www.dnr.state.mi.us/spatialdatalibrary/ metadata/lu1800.htm (28 January 1999).
44. Miller, R.O. 1998. Growing aspen fiber in Michigan: a rational for producing this material in short rotation, intensively cultured plantations on abandoned agricultural land in Michigan's Upper Peninsula. On-line research notes. Upper Peninsula Tree Improvement Center, Escanaba, Michigan. http://www.maes.msu.edu/uptic/library/ Aspen in Michigan.PDF (10 November 2005).
45. Morrison, M.L. 2001. A proposed research emphasis to overcome the limits of wildlifehabitat relationship studies. Journal of Wildlife Management 65:613-623.
46. Morrison, M.L., Marcot, B.G., and Mannan, R.W. 1992. Wildlife-habitat relationships: concepts and applications. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
47. Mowat, G., Poole, K.G., and O'Donoghue, M. 2000. Ecology of lynx in Northern Canada and Alaska. Pages 265-306 in Ruggiero, L.F., Aubry, K.B., Buskirk, S.W.,Koehler, G.M., Krebs, C.J. McKelvey, K.S., and Squires, J.R., eds. Ecology and Conservation of Lynx in the United States. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
48. Nellis, C.H.,Wetmore, S.P., andKeith, L.B. 1972. Lynx-prey interactions in central Alberta. Journal of Wildlife Management 36:320-329.
49. O'Donoghue, M., Boutin, S., Krebs, C.J., Murray, D.L., and Hofer, E.J. 1998. Behavioral responses of coyotes and lynx to the snowshoe hare cycle. Oikos 82:169-183.
50. Piva, R.J. 2003. Pulpwood production in the north-central region, 2000. Resource Bulletin NC-221. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station.
51. Roloff, G.J., and Haufler, J.B. 1997. Establishing population viability planning objectives based on habitat potential. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25:895-904.
52. Smith, W.B. 2002. Forest inventory and analysis: a national inventory and monitoring program. Environmental Pollution 116:S233-S242.
53. Stelfox, J.B., ed. 1995. Relationships between stand age, stand structure, and biodiversity in aspen mixed wood forest in Alberta. Jointly published by Alberta Environmental Center and Canadian Forest Service. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
54. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2000. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: Determination of threatened status for the contiguous U.S. distinct population segment of the Canada lynx and related, final rule. Federal Register 65:16052-16086.
55. Wood, N.A., and Dice, L.R. 1924. Records of the distribution of Michigan mammals. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters 3:425-445.