Establishing population viability planning objectives based on habitat potentials

Wildlife Society Bulletin

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 895-904

  Roloff, Gary J ^a,b,c,d   Haufler, Jonathan B ^a,d,e  

^a Boise Cascade Corporation   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STEVENS POINT   (United States)

^c EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Biological Diversity Working Group

Author keywords

Habitat modeling; Population viability; Resource planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031429216     PISSN: 00917648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. AKCAKAYA, H. R. 1995. RAMAS/GIS: Linking landscape data with wildlife management and conservation of endangered species. The Compiler 13:38-42.
2. ARMSTRONG, J. T. 1965. Breeding home range in the nighthawk and other birds; its evolutionary and ecological significance. Ecology 46:619-629.
3. BELOVSKY, G. E. 1987. Extinction models and mammalian persistence. Pages 35-57 in M. E. Soulé, ed. Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, N.Y.
4. BOYCE, M. S. 1992. Population viability analysis. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:481-506.
5. BOYCE, M. S., J. S. MEYER, AND L. L. IRWIN. 1994. Habitat-based PVA for the northern spotted owl. Pages 63-85 in D. J. Fletcher and B. F. J. Manly, eds. Statistics in ecology and environmental monitoring. Series 2. Univ. Otago, Dunedin, N.Z.
6. CALDER, W. A., III. 1984. Size, function, and life history. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass. 431pp.
7. CAUGHLEY, G., AND R. E. SINCLAIR. 1994. Wildlife ecology and management. Blackwell Sci. Publ., Cambridge, Mass. 334pp.
8. CHAMBERS, S. M. 1995. Spatial structure, genetic variation, and the neighborhood adjustment to effective population size. Conserv. Biol. 9:1312-1315.
9. GLUTTON-BROCK, T. H., AND P. H. HARVEY. 1977. Primate ecology and social organization. J. Zool. 183:1-39.
10. FAHRIG, L., AND G. MERRIAM. 1994. Conservation of fragmented populations. Conserv. Biol. 8:50-59.
11. GILPIN, M. E. 1987. Spatial structure and population vulnerability. Pages 125-139 in M. E. Soulé, ed. Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.
12. HANSKI, I. 1996. Metapopulation ecology. Pages 13-43 in O. E. Rhodes, Jr., R. K. Chesser, and M. H. Smith, eds. Population dynamics in ecological space and time. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.
13. HARESTAD, A. S., AND F. L. BUNNELL. 1979. Home range and body weight-a reevaluation. Ecology 60:389-402.
14. HARRISON, S. 1994. 5. Metapopulations and conservation. Pages 111-128 in P. J. Edwards, R. M. May, and N. R. Webb, eds. Large-scale ecology and conservation biology. Blackwell Sci. Publ., London, England.
15. HAUFLER, J. B., C. A. MEHL, AND G. J. ROLOFF. 1996. Using a coarse-filter approach with species assessment for ecosystem management. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 24:200-208.
16. HUNTER, M. L., JR. 1996. Fundamentals of conservation biology. Blackwell Sci., Cambridge, Mass. 482pp.
17. IRWIN, L. L. 1994. A process for improving wildlife habitat models for assessing forest ecosystem health. J. Sustain. For. 2:293-306.
18. KOEHLER, G. M., AND K. B. AUBRY. 1994. Lynx. Pages 74-98 in L. F. Ruggiero, K. B. Aubry, S. W. Buskirk, L. J. Lyon, and W. J. Zielinski, tech. eds. The scientific basis for conserving forest carnivores. American marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine in the western United States. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-254.
19. LANDE, R. 1995. Mutation and conservation. Conserv. Biol. 9:782-791.
20. LINDENMAYER, D. B., AND H. P. POSSINGHAM. 1996. Ranking conservation and timber management options for leadbeater's possum in southeastern Australia using population viability analysis. Conserv. Biol. 10:235-251.
21. LINDSTEDT, S. L., B. J. MILLER, AND S. W. BUSKIRK. 1986. Home range, time, and body size in mammals. Ecology 67:413-418.
22. LIU, J. 1993 Discounting initial population sizes for prediction of extinction probabilities in patchy environments. Ecol. Modelling 70:51-61.
23. LUJAN, M., JR., D. R. KNOWLES, J. TURNER, M. PLENERT. 1992. Recovery plan for the northern spotted owl - DRAFT. Unpubl. Rep., U.S. Dep. Inter. 661pp.
24. MAURER, B. A. 1994. Geographical population analysis: tools for the analysis of biodiversity. Blackwell Sci. Publ., London, Engl. 130pp.
25. MAY, R. M. 1994. The effects of spatial scale on ecological questions and answers. Pages 1-17 in P. J. Edwards, R. M. May, and N. R. Webb, eds. Large-scale ecology and conservation biology. Blackwell Sci. Publ., London, England.
26. MCNAB, B. K. 1963. Bioenergetics and the determination of home range size. Am. Nat. 97:133-139.
27. MORRISON, M. L., B. G. MARGOT, AND R. W. MANNAN. 1992. Wildlife-habitat relationships: concepts and applications. Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison. 343pp.
28. POSSINGHAM, H. P., AND I. DAVIES. 1995. ALEX: a model for the viability analysis of spatially structured populations. Biol. Conserv. 73:143-150.
29. QUINN, N. W. S., AND G. PARKER. 1987. Lynx. Pages 683-694 in M. Novak, J. A. Baker, M. E. Obbard, and B. Malloch, eds. Wild Furbearer Management and Conservation in North America. Ministry Nat. Resour., Ontario, Can.
30. ROLOFF, G. J. 1994. Using an ecological classification system and wildlife habitat models in forest planning. Ph.D. Diss., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing. 203pp.
31. RUGGIERO, L. F., G. D. HAYWARD, AND J. R. SQUIRES. 1994. Viability analysis in biological evaluations: concepts of population viability analysis, biological population, and ecological scale. Conserv. Biol. 8:364-372.
32. SCHOENER, T. W. 1968. Sizes of feeding territories among birds. Ecology 49:123-141.
33. SHAFFER, M. 1987. Minimum viable populations: coping with uncertainty. Pages 69-86 in M. E. Soulé, ed. Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, N.Y.
34. SLATKIN, M. 1985. Gene flow in natural populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Systematics 16:393-430.
35. SOULÉ, M. E. 1987. Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Great Britain. 189pp.
36. SWIHART, R. K., N. A. SLADE, AND B. J. BERGSTROM. 1988. Relating body size to the rate of home range use in mammals. Ecology 69:393-399.
37. TAYLOR, B. L. 1995. The reliability of using population viability analysis for risk classification of species. Conserv. Biol. 9:551-558.
38. THOMAS, C. D. 1994. Extinction, colonization, and metapopulations: environmental tracking by rare species. Conserv. Biol. 8: 373-378.
39. THOMAS, J. W., E. D. FORSMAN, J. B. LINT, E. C MESLOW, B. R. NOON, AND J. VERNER. 1990. A conservation strategy for the northern spotted owl. U.S. For. Serv., U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Bur. Land Manage., and Nat. Park Serv., Portland, Oreg. May 1990. U.S. Gov. Printing Off. 1990-791-171/20026. 427pp.+3 maps.
40. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. 1981. Standards for the development of habitat suitability index models. U.S. Dep. Int. Fish Wildl. Serv. Rel. No. 1-81, 103 ESM.
41. VANHORNE, B. 1983. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. J. Wildl. Manage. 47:893-901.
42. VANHORNE, B., AND J. A. WIENS. 1991. Forest bird habitat suitability models and the development of general habitat models. U.S. Dep. Int. Fish Wildl. Serv. Res. 8. 31pp.
43. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE. 1993. Status of the North American lynx (Lynx canadensis) in Washington. Unpubl. Rep., Wash. Dep. Wildl., Olympia. 95pp.
44. WELLS, J. V., AND M. E. RICHMOND. 1995. Populations, metapopulations, and species populations: what are they and who should care? Wildl. Soc. Bull. 23:458-462.