Using a coarse-filter approach with species assessment for ecosystem management

Wildlife Society Bulletin

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 200-208

  Haufler, Jonathan B ^a,b,c,d,e   Mehl, Carolyn A ^a,f,g,h,i   Roloff, Gary J ^a,b,j,k,l  

^a Boise Cascade Corporation   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

^d VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Virginia Tech ^*  (United States)

^f Boise Cascade's Ecosyst Mgmt Proj   (United States)

^g US Fish and Wildlife Service   (United States)

^h Environ Manegementt Associates   (Canada)

ⁱ US Army Corps Engineers   (United States)

^j MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STEVENS POINT   (United States)

^l EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

coarse filter; ecosystem integrity; ecosystem management; fine filter; forest planning; habitat modeling; landscape ecology

Indexed keywords

COARSE-FILTER APPROACH; CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; SPECIES ASSESSMENT;

USA, IDAHO;

EID: 0029661013     PISSN: 00917648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. AGEE, J. 1993. Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest forests. Island Press, Washington, D.C. 493pp.
2. CRANE, M. F., AND W. C. FISCHER, 1986. Fire ecology of the forest habitat types of central Idaho. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-218. 86pp.
3. DAUBENMIRE, R. F. 1968. Plant communities: a textbook of plant synecology. Harper and Row, N.Y. 300pp.
4. ECOMAP. 1993. National hierarchical framework of ecological units. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., Washington, D.C. 18pp.
5. HAMILTON, R. C. 1993. Characteristics of old-growth forests in the intermountain region. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., Intermountain Reg., Ogden, Ut. 86pp.
6. HAUFLER, J. B. 1994. An ecological framework for forest planning for forest health J. Sustainable For. 2:307-316.
7. HAUFLER, J. B. 1995. Forest industry partnerships for ecosystem management. Trans. North Am, Wildl, Nat. Resour. Conf. 60:422-432.
8. HAUFLER, J. B., AND L. L., IRWIN. 1993. An ecological basis for forest plannning for biodiversity and resource use. Proc. Int. Union Game Biol 21:73-81.
9. HUNTER, M. L. 1990. Wildlife, forests, and forestry: principles of managing forests for biodiversity. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 370pp.
10. KAUFMANN, M. R., R. T. GRAHAM, D. A. BOYCE, JR., W. H. MOIR, L. PERRY, R. T. REYNOLDS, R. BASSEIT, P. MEHLHOP, C B. EDMINSTER, W. M. BLOCK, AND P. S. CORN. 1994. An ecological basis for ecosystem management U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-246. 22pp.
11. McNAB, W. H., AND P. E. AVERS, COMPILERS. 1994. Ecological subregions of the United Sates: section descriptions. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Adm. Publ. WO-WSA-5. 267pp.
12. MOBGAN, P., G. H. APLET, J. B. HAUFLER, H. C. HUMPHRIES, M. M. MOORE, AND W. D. WILSON. 1994. Historical range of variability: a useful tool for evaluating ecosystem change. J. Sustainable For. 2:87-112.
13. MORRISON, M. L, B. G. MAKCOT, AND R. W. MANNAN. 1992. Wildlife-habitat relationships: concepts and applications. Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison. 343pp.
14. ROLOEF, G. 1994. Using an ecological classification system and wildlife habitat models in forest planning. Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing. 203pp.
15. STEELE, R., R. D. PFISTER, R. A. RYKER, AND J. A. KITTAMS. 1981. Forest habitat types of central Idaho. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-114. 138pp.