Fracture strength of indirect resin composite laminates to teeth with existing restorations: An evaluation of conditioning protocols

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 391-397

  Özcan, Mutlu ^a   Mese, Ayse ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b DICLE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Fracture strength; Indirect composite; Laminates; Surface conditioning

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CLEARFIL REPAIR; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PANAVIA FLUORO; PANAVIA-FLUORO; POLYURETHAN; QUADRANT ANTERIOR SHINE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILANE DERIVATIVE; SILICON DIOXIDE; URETHANETRIMETHACRYLATE; WATER;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TEMPERATURE; TIME;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ALUMINUM OXIDE; CEMENTATION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL VENEERS; HUMANS; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; POLYURETHANES; RESIN CEMENTS; SILANES; SILICON DIOXIDE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH PREPARATION; WATER;

EID: 77649224737     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: 17579988     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a17632     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brendeke J, Özcan M. Effect of physicochemical aging conditions on the composite-composite repair bond strength. J Adhes Dent 2007;9: 399-406.
2. Brunski JB. Biomechanics of oral implants: future research directions. J Dent Educ 1988;52: 775-787.
3. Ferracane JL, Marker VA. Solvent degradation and reduced fracture toughness in aged composites. J Dent Res 1992;71: 9-13.
4. Friedman MJ. A 15-year review of porcelain veneer failure-a clinician’s observations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;19: 625-632.
5. Gresnigt M, Özcan M. Fracture strength of direct versus indirect laminates using fibers with and without fiber application at the cementation interface. Dent Mater 2007;23: 927-933.
6. Hattori Y, Satoh C, Seki S, Watanabe Y, Ogino Y, Watanabe M. Occlusal and TMJ loads in subjects with experimentally shortened dental arches. J Dent Res 2003;82: 532-536
7. Kao EC, Pryor HG, Johnston WM. Strength of composites repaired by laminating with dissimilar composites. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60: 328-333.
8. Kumagai H, Suzuki T, Hamada T, Sondang P, Fujitani M, Nikawa H. Occlusal force distribution on the dental arch during various levels of clenching. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26: 932-935.
9. Kupiec KA, Barkmeier WW. Laboratory evaluation of surface treatments for composite repair. Oper Dent 1996;21: 59-62.
10. Li J. Effect of surface properties on bond strength between layers of newly cured dental composites. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24: 358-360.
11. Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Patra AK, Cohen RE. An assessment of stress analyses in the theory of abfraction. Biomed Mater Eng 2004;14: 311-321.
12. Magne P, Versluis A, Douglas WH. Effect of luting composite shrinkage and thermal loads on the stress distribution in porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81: 335-343.
13. Meijering AC, Creugers NHJ, Roeters FJM, Mulder J. Survival of three types of veneer restorations in a clinical trial: a 2.5-year interim evaluation. J Dent 1998;26: 563-568.
14. Özcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003;19: 725-731.
15. Özcan M, Alander P, Vallittu PK, Huysmans MC, Kalk W. Effect of three surface conditioning methods to improve bond strength of particulate filler resin composites. J Mat Sci: Mat in Med 2005;16: 21-27.
16. Özcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, Galhano GA, Bottino MA. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater 2007;23: 1276-1282.
17. Peumans M, van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent 2000;28: 163-177.
18. Roulet J-F. In: Degradation of dental polymers. Basel, Karger, 1987;60-69.
19. Rucker LM, Richter W, MacEntee M, Richardson A. Porcelain and resin veneers clinically evaluated: 2 year results. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;121: 594-596.
20. Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. J Dent 1998;26: 685-694.
21. Troedson M, Derand T. Effect of margin design, cement polymerization, and angle off loading on stress in porcelain veneers. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82: 518-524.
22. Wall JG, Reisbick MH, Johnston WM. Incisal-edge strength of porcelain laminate veneers restoring mandibular incisors. Int J Proshodont 1992;5: 441-446.
23. Wang J, Crouch SL, Mogilevskaya SG. Numerical modelling of the elastic behaviour of fiber-reinforced composites with inhomogeneous interphases. Compos Sci Technol 2006;66: 1-18.
24. Yamaga T, Sato Y, Akagawa Y, Taira M, Wakasa K, Yamaki M. Hardness and fracture toughness of four commercial visible light-cured composite resin veneering materials. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22: 857-863.