Rat model for studying tissue changes induced by the mechanical environment surrounding loaded titanium implants

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 800-807

  Hou, Xiaowei ^a   Weiler, Michael A ^b   Winger, Julia N ^b   Morris, James R ^b   Borke, James L ^b  

^a HEBEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal study; Finite element analysis; Implant; Osseointegration; Rat model

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COLLAGENASE 3; MMP13 PROTEIN, RAT; OSTEOCALCIN; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; DENTURE; ENZYMOLOGY; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MALE; MASTICATION; MAXILLA; MECHANICAL STRESS; MOLAR TOOTH; OSTEOCLAST; PATHOLOGY; PERIODONTIUM; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RAT; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; TIME; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH SOCKET;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BITE FORCE; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MALE; MATRIX METALLOPROTEINASE 13; MAXILLA; MODELS, ANIMAL; MOLAR; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEOCLASTS; OSTEOGENESIS; PERIAPICAL TISSUE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH SOCKET;

EID: 77649213347     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Dodson TB. Predictors of dental implant survival. J Mass Dent Soc 2006; 54: 34-38.
2. Stegaroiu R, Sato T, Kusakari H, Miyakawa O. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 82-90.
3. Ciftci Y, Canay S. The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant supported fixed prosthetic restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 571-582.
4. Brånemark PI. Introduction to osseointegration. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb G, Albrektsson T (eds). Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985: 11-76.
5. Holmes DC, Loftus JT. Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants. J Oral Implantol 1997; 23: 104-111.
6. Duyck J, Ronold HJ, Van Oosterwyck H, Naert I, Vander Sloten J, Ellingsen JE. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: An animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 207-218.
7. Hoshaw SJ, Brunski JB, Cochran GVB. Mechanical loading of Brånemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9: 345-360.
8. Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Schmid B, Weigel C, et al. Does excessive occlusal load affect osseointegration? An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 259-268.
9. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lindhe J. Bone reactions to longstanding functional load at implants: An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 925-932.
10. De Smet E, Jaecques S, Vandamme K, Vander Sloten J, Naert I. Positive effect of early loading on implant stability in the bicortical guinea-pig model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 402-407.
11. Meijer HJ, Starmans FJ, Steen WH, Bosman F. Location of implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible and the consequences for the design of the superstructure. J Oral Rehabil 1994; 21: 47-56.
12. Meijer HJ, Starmans FJ, Bosman F, Steen WH. A comparison of three finite element models of an edentulous mandible provided with implants. J Oral Rehabil 1993; 20: 147-157.
13. Bozkaya D, Muftu S, Muftu A. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 523-530.
14. Akca K, Iplikcioglu H. Finite element stress analysis of the effect of short implant usage in place of cantilever extensions in mandibular posterior edentulism. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 350-356.
15. Akca K, Iplikcioglu H. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16: 722-730.
16. Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne SC, Felton DA. 3D-FEA of osseointegration percentages and patterns on implant-bone interfacial stresses. J Dent 1997; 25: 485-491.
17. Hsu SM, Raine L, Fanger H. Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: A comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures. J Histochem Cytochem 1981; 29: 577-580.
18. Borke JL, Minami J, Verma AK, Penniston JT, Kumar R. Monoclonal antibodies to human erythrocyte membrane Ca++-Mg++ adenosine triphosphatase pump recognize an epitope in the basolateral membrane of human kidney distal tubule cell. J Clin Invest 1987; 80: 1225-1231.
19. Pagani F, Francucci CM, Moro L. Markers of bone turnover: Biochemical and clinical perspectives. J Endocrinol Invest 2005; 28(10, suppl): 8-13.
20. Shibazaki R, Dechow PC, Maki K, Opperman LA. Biomechanical strain and morphologic changes with age in rat calvarial bone and sutures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 2167-2178.
21. Choi APC, Zheng YP. Estimation of Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio of soft tissue from indentation using two differentsized indentors: Finite element analysis of the finite deformation effect. Med Biol Eng Comput 2005; 43: 258-264.
22. Kawarizadeh A, Bourauel C, Zhang D, Götz W, Jäger A. Correlation of stress and strain profiles and the distribution of osteoclastic cells induced by orthodontic loading in rat. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112: 140-147.
23. Abé H, Hayashi K, Sato M (eds). Data Book on Mechanical Properties of Living Cells, Tissues, and Organs. Berlin: Springer, 1996.
24. Rieger MR, Fareed K, Adams WK, Tanquist RA. Bone stress distribution for three endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 223-228.
25. Juodzbalys G, Kubilius R, Eidukynas V, Raustia A, Aune M. Stress distribution in bone: Single-unit implant prostheses veneered with porcelain of a new composite material. Implant Dent 2005; 14: 166-175.
26. Brunski JB, Pules DA, Nanci A. Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: Current status and future developments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 15-46.
27. Brunski JB. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface. Clin Mater 1992; 10: 153-201.
28. Albrektsson T. Bone tissue response. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds). Tissue-Integrated Prostheses. Chicago: Quintessence, 1987: 129-143.
29. Frost HM. Wolff’s law and bone’s structural adaptations to mechanical usage: An overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 175-188.
30. Frost HM. A determinant of bone architecture: The minimum effective strain. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; 175: 286-292.
31. Pilliar RM. Dental implants: Materials and design. J Can Dent Assoc 1990; 56: 857-861.