Stress distribution in bone: Single-unit implant prostheses veneered with porcelain or a new composite material

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 166-175

  Juodzbalys, Gintaras ^a,d   Kubilius, Ricardas ^a   Eidukynas, Valdas ^b   Raustia, Aune M ^c  

^a KAUNAS UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE   (Lithuania)

^b KAUNAS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Lithuania)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^d NONE   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Dental implant; Finite element analysis; Static load; Transitional load; Veneering material

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE DEFORMATION; CALCULATION; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FORCE; IMPLANT; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; RIGIDITY; SIMULATION; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; VARIANCE;

BITE FORCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROWNS; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL VENEERS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 21344465880     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000165030.59555.2c     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Castellani R, de Ruijter JE, Renggli H, et al. Response of rat bone marrow cells to differently roughened titanium discs. Clin Oral Implant Res. 1999;10:369-378.
2. Rosa AL, Beloti MB. Rat bone marrow cell response to titanium and titanium alloy with different surface roughness. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2003;14:43-48.
3. Chun HJ, Cheong SY, Han JH, et al. Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:565-574.
4. Hoshaw SJ, Brunski JB, Cochran GVB. Mechanical loading of Branemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:347-360.
5. Ishigaki S, Nakano T, Yamada S, et al. Biomechanical stress in bone surrounding an implant under simulated chewing. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2002;14:97-102.
6. Del Valle V, Faulkner G, Wolfaardt J. Craniofacial osseointegrated implant-induced strain distribution: a numerical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl. 1997;12:200-210.
7. Isidor F. Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation. Clin Oral Implant Res. 1997;8:1-9.
8. Duyck J, Ronold HJ, Van Oosterwyck H, et al. The influence of static and dynamic loading on the marginal bone behavior around implants: an animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2001;12:207-218.
9. Tepper G, Haas R, Zechner W, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant stability in the atrophic posterior maxilla. A mathematical study of the sinus floor augmentation. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2002;13:657-665.
10. Choy E, Kydd WL. Bite force duration: a diagnostic procedure for mandibular dysfunction. J Prost Den. 1988;60:635-368.
11. Mericske-Stern R, Assal P, Buergin W. Simultaneous force measurements in three dimensions on oral endosseous implants in vitro and vivo. A methodological study. Clin Oral Implant Res. 1996;7:378-386.
12. Menicucci G, Mossolov A, Mozzati M, et al. Tooth-implant connection: some biomechanical aspects based on finite element analyses. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2002;13:334-341.
13. Brunski JB. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental implant interface. Adv Dental Res. 1999;13:99-119.
14. Ciftci Y, Canay S. Stress distribution on the metal framework of the implant-supported fixed prosthesis using different veneering materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14:406-411.
15. Tripodakis APD, Strub JR, Kappert HF, et al. Strength and mode of failure of single implant all-ceramic abutment restorations under static load. Int J Prosthodont. 1995;8:265-272.
16. Uteno T, Sakuma T. Physical properties of composite material for crown & bridge applications. 2001; Abstr. 953, AADR March 7-10, Chicago, Illinois.
17. ANSYS Engineering Analysis System for Rev. 5.0A, Vol. 4, Theory, Swanson Analysis Systems, Inc. Houston, PA 15342-0065, 1992.
18. Koolstra JH, Eijden JV, Weijs WA, et al. Three-dimensional mathematical model of the human masticatory system predicting maximum possible bite force. J Biomechanics. 1988;21:563-567.
19. Rieger MR, Fareed K, Adams WK, et al. Bone stress distribution for three endosseous implants. J Prosth Dent. 1989; 61:223-228.
20. Duyck J, Naert IE, Van-Oosterwyck H, et al. Biomechanics of oral implants: a review of the literature. Tech Health Care. 1997;5:253-273.