Determining a required energy efficiency design index level for new ships based on a cost effectiveness criterion

Maritime Policy and Management

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 129-143

  Longva, Tore ^a   Eide, Magnus S ^a   Skjong, Rolf ^a  

^a DNV GL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EMISSION CONTROL; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; EXHAUST EMISSION; GREENHOUSE GAS; REGULATORY APPROACH; SHIPPING; TRADE-ENVIRONMENT RELATIONS;

EID: 77649203702     PISSN: 03088839     EISSN: 14645254     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03088830903533759     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. ENDRESEN, Ø., DALSØREN, S., EIDE, M., ISAKSEN, I. S. and SØRGA RD, E., 2008, The environmental impacts of increased international maritime shipping, past trends future perspectives. In OECD/ITF Global Forum on Transport and Environment in a Globalising World, November 10-12, Guadalajara, Mexico.
2. BUHAUG, Ø., CORBETT, J. J., ENDRESEN, Ø., EYRING, V., FABER, J., HANAYAMA, S., LEE, D. S., LEE, D., LINDSTAD, H., MARKOWSKA, A. Z., MJELDE, A., NELISSEN, D., NILSEN, J., PA°LSSON, C., WINEBRAKE, J. J., WU, W.-Q. and YOSHIDA, K., 2009, Second IMO GHG Study 2009, International Maritime Organization (IMO) London, UK, April.
3. 2 emissions from shipping. Submitted to the International Maritime Organization, MEPC 58/INF.14.
4. th International Marine Design Conference, May 26-29, Vol. 2, Trondheim, Norway: Tapir Academic Press.
5. ENDRESEN, Ø., SØrga°rd, E., BEHRENS H. L., BRETT, P. O. and ISAKSEN, I. S. A., 2007, A historical reconstruction of ships' fuel consumption emissions. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112, D12301, doi: 10.1029/2006JD007630.
6. SCHMIDT, J., HELME, N., LEE, J. and HOUDASHELT, M., 2008, Sector-based approach to the post-2012 climate. Climate Policy, 8, 494-515, doi: 10.3763/cpol.2007.0321.
7. INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANISATION (IMO), 2009, Report of the Marine Environment Protection Committee in its Fifty-Ninth Session. MEPC 59/24.
8. UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE (UNFCCC), 1997, Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. FCCC/CP/1997/L.7/Add.1.
9. INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANISATION (IMO), 1998, The Protocol of 1997 to Amend MARPOL 73/78: Annex VI of MARPOL 73/78, ISBN 9280160893, International Maritime Organization, London (UK).
10. REUTERS, 2007, EU confirms to propose ships join emissions trade, available from: http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSL1639411220070416, 16 April 2007.
11. VAN DENDER, K. and CRIST, P., 2008, Policy instruments to limit negative environmental impacts from increased international transport: an economic perspective. In OECD/ITF Global Forum on Transport and Environment in a Globalising World, November 10-12, Guadalajara, Mexico.
12. GEHRING, M., 2008, Policy Instruments to limit negative environmental impacts from increased international transport - Constraints opportunities in international law. In OECD/ITF Global Forum on Transport and Environment in a Globalising World, November 10-12, Guadalajara, Mexico.
13. CE DELFT, GERMANISCHER LLOYD, MARINTEK and DET NORSKE VERITAS, 2006, Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Shipping: Implementation of the Marine Sulphur Directive. Publication number 06.4103.61, CE Delft, December 2006.
14. TORVANGER, A., BOGSTRAND, B., BIELTVEDT SKEIE, R. and FUGLESTVEDT, J., 2007, Climate Regulation of Ships. Report 2007:7. Cicero, December 2007.
15. KA°GESON, P., 2008, The maritime emissions trading scheme, Working paper, Nature Associates, Stockholm, May 12.
16. 2 reducing measures in shipping. Maritime Policy & Management, 36(4), 367-384.
17. NORWAY, 2009, A methodology for establishing an emission cap in an ETS for international shipping. MEPC 59/4/24.
18. DENMARK, 2008, Formal Safety Assessment - Cruise ships. Submitted to the International Maritime Organization. MSC 85/17/1 MSC 85/INF.2.
19. NORWAY, 2000, Formal Safety Assessment - Decision parameters including risk acceptance criteria. Submitted to the International Maritime Organization. MSC 72/16.
20. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CLASSIFICATION SOCIETIES (IACS), 2004, Experience with Formal Safety Assessment at IMO. Submitted to the International Maritime Organization. MSC 78/19/1.
21. WENDEL, K., 1968, Subdivision of ships. In: Proceedings of Diamond Jubilee International Meeting, 75th Anniversary. Society of Naval Architects Marine Engineers, New York, pp. 12-1-12-27.
22. SKJONG, R., 2009, Regulatory Framework. In: Risk-based Ship Design: Methods, Tools Applications, edited by A. Papanikolaou (Berlin, Germany: Springer Publishing), pp. 97-151.
23. DENMARK, 2008, Formal Safety Assessment - RoPax ships, submitted to the International Maritime Organization. MSC 85/17/2 MSC 85/INF.3.
24. INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANISATION (IMO), 2009, Interim Guidelines on the Method of Calculation of the Energy Efficiency Design Index for New Ships. MEPC.1/Circ.681.
25. INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANISATION (IMO), 2007, Formal Safety Assessment -Consolidated text of the Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process. (Report from the SAFEDOR project) MSC/Circ.1023, MEPC/Circ.392.
26. SKJONG, R., VANEM, E., ENDRESEN, Ø., 2005, Risk Evaluation Criteria. SAFEDORD- 4.5.2-2005-10-21-DNV, Det Norske Veritas AS, October 21, 2005.
27. DALSØREN, S., EIDE, M., ENDRESEN, Ø., MJELDE, A., GRAVIR, G. and ISAKSEN, I. S. A., 2009, Update on emissions environmental impacts from the international fleet. The contribution from major ship types ports. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 9, 2171-2194.
28. FAIRPLAY, 2008, The World Fleet Database (U.K: Lloyd's Register - Fairplay Ltd).
29. BUNKERWORLD, 2008, Monthly bunker prices in Rotterdam - IFO180 (RME25, RMF25), available from http://www.bunkerworld.com/markets/prices/nl/rtm/monthly,accessed March and November 2008.
30. INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY (IEA), 2007, Energy Prices Taxes - Marine Bunker Spot Prices (USD/tonne). Vol 2007, release 02. Energy Prices & Taxes, 2. Quarter 2007.
31. 2 Index Baselines Recalculation thereof. Submitted to the International Maritime Organization. MEPC 58/4/8.