Cost-effectiveness assessment of CO2 reducing measures in shipping

Maritime Policy and Management

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 367-384

  Eide, Magnus S ^a   Endresen, Øyvind ^a   Skjong, Rolf ^a   Longva, Tore ^a   Alvik, Sverre ^a  

^a DNV GL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GREENHOUSE GAS; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE; SHIPPING;

EID: 71249159882     PISSN: 03088839     EISSN: 14645254     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03088830903057031     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. IMO, 2008, MEPC 58/INF.6, Updated Study on Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ships: Phase I Report, International Maritime Organization (IMO) London, UK, 1 September.
2. ENDRESEN, Ø., DALSØREN, S., EIDE, M., ISAKSEN, I. S. and SØRGARD, E., 2008, The environmental impacts of increased international maritime shipping, past trends and future perspectives. OECD/ITF Global Forum on Transport and Environment in a Globalising World, 10-12 November, Guadalajara, Mexico.
3. OCEANA, 2008, Shipping impacts on climate: a source with solutions, Washington, DC, USA. Available at http://www.oceana.org/fileadmin/oceana/uploads/Climate_Change/ Oceana_Shipping_Report.pdf
4. IMO, 2008, Emissions from fuel used for international aviation and maritime transport. Information by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), FCCC/SBSTA/2008/ MISC.9, 28th session, 4-13 June, Bonn, Germany.
5. REUTERS,2007, EU confirms to propose ships join emissions trade, Monday 16 April. Available at http://www.reuters.com/article/environment News/idUSL1 639411220070416.
6. Van Dender, K. and Crist, P., 2008, Policy instruments to limit negative environmental impacts from increased international transport: an economic perspective, Global Forum on Transport and Environment in a Globalising World, November, Guadalajara, Mexico.
7. GEHRING, M., 2008, Policy instruments to limit negative environmental impacts from increased international transport-constraints and opportunities in international law. Global Forum on Transport and Environment in a Globalising World. November, Guadalajara, Mexico.
8. Ce Delft, Germanischer Lloyd, Marintek, Det Norske Veritas, 2006, Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Shipping and Implementation of the Marine Sulphur Directive, CE Delft Publication No. 06.4103.61.
9. UNFCCC, 2008, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change/ Subsidiary body for scientific and technological advice, Provisional agenda and annotations, 29th session, Poznan, 1-10 December, FCCC/SBSTA/2008/7.
10. WALKER, G. and KING, D., 2008, The Hot Topic-How to Tackle Global Warming and Still Keep the Lights On (London: Bloomsbury Publishing).
11. EUROPEAN COUNCIL, 2007, Presidency Conclusions-Brussels European Council 8/9 March 2007,7224/07.
12. IPCC, 2007, IPCC 4th assessment report-Synthesis Report, Emissions of long-lived GHGs, http://www.IPCC.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf.
13. 2 Emissions from International Shipping to the EU ETS.
14. ICCT (THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON CLEAN TRANSPORTATION), 2007, Air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from ocean-going ships: impacts, mitigation options and opportunities for managing growth.
15. SCHMIDT, J., HELME, N., LEE, J. and HOUDASHELT, M., 2007, Sector-based approach tothe post-2012 climate. Climate Policy, 8(5).
16. IMO, 2007, Formal Safety Assessment - Consolidated text of the Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process (MSC/Circ. 1023-MEPC/Circ. 392), Note by the Secretariat, MSC 83/INF.2.
17. SKJONG, R. and RONOLD, K. O., 1998, Societal indicators and risk acceptance. Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference, OMAE.
18. NORWAY, 2000, Formal safety assessment - decision parameters including risk acceptance criteria, Submitted by Norway, MSC 72/16.
19. SKJONG, R., 2002, Risk acceptance criteria: current proposals and IMO position. Surface Transport Technologies for Sustainable Development, 4-6 June, Valencia, Spain.
20. VANEM, E., ENDRESEN, Ø. and SKJONG, R., 2007, Cost-effectiveness criteria for marine oil spill preventive measures. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93(9), 1354-1368.
21. DENMARK, 2008, Formal safety assessment-RoPax ships, submitted to the International Maritime Organization, IMO MSC85/17/2 and MSC85/INF.3.
22. IACS, 2004, Experience with formal safety assessment at IMO, Submitted by the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS), MSC 78/19/1.
23. SKJONG, R., 2009, Regulatory Framework, in Risk-based Ship Design: Methods, Tools and Applications, edited by A. Papanikolaou (Berlin, Germany: Springer Publishing).
24. SKJONG, R., VANEM, E. and ENDRESEN, Ø., 2005, Risk evaluation, Safedor deliverable 4.5.2, Integrated project 516278 in the 6th framework programme of the European Commission.
25. IMO, 2000, MEPC 45/8, Report on the outcome of the IMO Study on Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ships, 29 June.
26. AEA ENERGY ENVIRONMENT, 2007, Low carbon commercial shipping, Report for the Department for Transport. ED05465 Issue 3. Available at http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/ scienceresearch/technology/lctis/reportaeanewcastleunipdf.
27. NERA, 2005, Economic instruments for reducing ship emissions in the European Union European Commission, Directorate-General Environment, 26 September. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/pdf/task3_final.pdf.
28. COFALA, J., AMANN, M., HEYES, C., WAGNER, F., KLIMONT, Z., POSCH, M., SCHOPP, W., TARASSON, L., JONSON, J. E., WHALL, C. and STAVRAKAKI, A., 2007, Analysis of policy measures to reduce ship emissions in the context of the revision of the national emissions ceilings Directive. Service Contract No. 070501/2005/419589/MAR/C1, European Commission, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria. Available at: http://www.iiasa.ac.at/rains/reports/IR06-107_Ships.pdf.
29. IPCC, 2000, Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Available at http://www.grida.no/climate/IPCC/emission/(including summary for policymakers. Available at http://www.grida.no/climate/IPCC/spmpdf/sres-e.pdf).
30. IPCC, 2007, IPCC fourth assessment report-summary for policymakers, in Climate Change 2007: Mitigation (Chapter D. Mitigation on long term), Contribution of Working Group III. Available at: http://www.IPCC.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg3/ ar4-wg3-spm.pdf.
31. IPCC, 2007, IPCC fourth assessment report-Working Group III Report, Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective, Chapter 11.
32. IEA (INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY), 2008, World Energy Outlook 2008.
33. STERN, N., 2006, The economics of climate change-the Stern Review (Part III: The economics of stabilisation). Cabinet Office, HM Treasury(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
34. NORDHAUS, W., 2008, A Question of Balance-Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies, (Yale University Press).
35. HalsnæS, K., Shukla, P., Ahuja, D., Akumu, G., Beale, R., Edmonds, J., GOllier, C., Gruber, A., Ha Duong, M., Markandya, A., McRarland, M., Nikitina, E., Sugiyama, T., Villavicencio, A. and Zou, J., 2007, Framing issues, in Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by B. Metz, O. R. Davidson, P. R. Bosch, R. Dave and L. A. Meyer (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press).
36. MCKINSEY, A cost curve for greenhouse gas reduction, The McKinsey Quarterly 2007 Number 1.
37. DALSØREN, S., EIDE, M., ENDRESEN, Ø., MJELDE, A., GRAVIR, G. and ISAKSEN, I. S. A., 2009, Update on emissions and environmental impacts from the international fleet. The contribution from major ship types and ports. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2171-2194.
38. INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY (IEA), 2007, Energy Prices and Taxes-Marine Bunker Spot Prices (US$/tonne), Vol2007, release 02.
39. BUNKERWORLD, 2008, Monthly bunker prices in Rotterdam- IFO180 (RME25,RMF25). Available at: http://www.bunkerworld.com/markets/prices/nl/rtm/monthly.
40. ENDRESEN, Ø., SØRGARD, E., BEHRENS, H. L., BRETT, P. O. and ISAKSEN, I. S. A., 2007, A historical reconstruction of ships fuel consumption and emissions. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112, D12301.
41. IPCC, 2006, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme.
42. INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION, MARINE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION COMMITTEE, 2008, Report of the Marine Environment Protection Committee in its 58th Session, MEPC 58/23.
43. IEA (INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY), 2006, Energy technology perspectives. Scenarios & Strategies up to 2050, Section 3, Chapter 3.
44. Marine Propulsion, 2008, Operational feedback from DF-electric fleet. Marine Propulsion, April/May, 23-26.
45. IMO, 2004, SOLAS, Chapter XI-2 Reg 1 (London: IMO).
46. NORWAY, 2008, ECDIS and ENC coverage-application of carriage requirements for ECDIS. Submitted by Norway, NAV 54/14.
47. VANEM, E, EIDE, M. S., LEPSØE, A., GRAVIR, G. and SKJONG, R., 2007, Electronic chart display and information systems for navigational safety in maritime transportation. European Journal of Navigation.
48. DENMARK, 2008, Formal safety assessment-cruise ships. Submitted to the International Maritime Organization, MSC 85/17/1 and MSC 85/INF.2.
49. 2 index level for future ship design. In preparation.
50. Torvanger, A., Bogstrand, B., Bieltvedt Skeie, R. and Fuglestvedt, J., 2007, Climate regulation of ships, CICERO Report, 2007:7.