The effect of various preparation designs on the survival of porcelain laminate veneers

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 405-411

  Serdar Cotert H ^a   Dündar, Mine ^a   Öztürk, Berran ^a  

^a EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Laminate preparation design; Porcelain laminate veneers; Survival rate

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; EXCITE CEMENT; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN CEMENT; VARIOLINK;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GINGIVA; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; SURVIVAL; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALUMINUM SILICATES; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS REPAIR; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL VENEERS; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GINGIVA; HUMANS; MALE; METHACRYLATES; MIDDLE AGED; RESIN CEMENTS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH PREPARATION; TOOTH, NONVITAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77649203536     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: 17579988     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a17634     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aristidis GA, Dimitra B. Five-year clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers. Quintessence Int 2002; 33: 185-189.
2. Brunton PA, Aminian A, Wilson NH. Tooth preparation techniques for porcelain laminate veneers. Br Dent J 2000; 189: 260-262.
3. Brunton PA, Richmond S, Wilson NH. Variations in the depth of preparations for porcelain laminate veneers. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1997; 5: 89-92.
4. Brunton PA, Wilson NH. Preparations for porcelain laminate veneers in general dental practice. Br Dent J 1998; 184: 553-556.
5. Buonocore MG. A Simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34: 849-853.
6. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Garberoglio R, Davidson CL. Dentin contamination protection after mechanical preparation for veneering. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 57-60.
7. Calamia JR. Etched porcelain facial veneers: A new treatment modality based on scientific and clinical evidence. NYJ Dent 1983; 53: 255-259.
8. Castelnouvo J, Tjan AH, Phillips K, Nicholls JI, Kois JC. Fracture load and mode of failure of ceramic veneers with different preparations. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 171-180.
9. Cherukara GP, Davis GR, Seymour KG, Zou L, Samarawickrama DY. Dentin exposure in tooth preparations for porcelain veneers: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 414-420.
10. Curry FT. Porcelain veneers: Adjunct or alternative to orthodontic therapy. J Esthet Dent 1998; 10: 67-74.
11. Cutbirth ST. Treatment planning for porcelain veneer restoration of crowded teeth by modifying stone models. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001; 13: 29-39.
12. Çehreli MC, Plikçiolu H. Five year follow-up of InCeram laminate restorations: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 487-489.
13. Davis LG, Ashworth PD, Spriggs LS. Psychological effects of aesthetic dental treatment. J Dent 1998; 26: 547-554.
14. Denissen HW, Wijnhoff GF, Veldhuis AA, Kalk W. Five-year study of allporcelain veneer fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69: 464-468.
15. Dumfahrt H, Schaffer H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part II-Clinical Results. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13: 9-18.
16. Dumfahrt H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part I-Clinical procedure. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12: 505-513.
17. Ferrari M, Patroni S, Balleri P. Measurement of enamel thickness in relation to reduction for etched laminate veneers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992; 12: 407-413.
18. Fradeani M. Six-year follow-up with Empress veneers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998; 18: 216-225.
19. Friedman MJ. A 15-year review of porcelain veneer failure-A clinician’s observations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 19: 625-628.
20. Garber D. Porcelain laminate veneers: Ten years later. Part I: Tooth preparation. J Esthet Dent 1993; 5: 56-62.
21. Gilmour AS, Stone DC. Porcelain laminate veneers: A clinical success? Dent Update 1993; 20: 167-169.
22. Gilpatrick RO, Ross JA, Simonsen RJ. Resin-to-enamel bond strengths with various etching times. Quintessence Int 1991; 22: 47-49.
23. Hahn P, Gustav M, Hellwig E. An in vitro assesment of the strength of porcelain veneers dependent on tooth preparation. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27: 1024-1029.
24. Hui KK, Williams B, Holt RD. A comparative assessment of the strengths of porcelain veneers for incisor teeth dependent on their design characteristics. Br Dent J 1991; 171: 51-55.
25. Kedici PS, Kalipcilar B, Bilir OG. Effect of glass ionomer liners on bonding strength of laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 29-32.
26. Magne P, Douglas WH. Design optimization and evolution of bonded ceramics for the anterior dentition: A finite element analysis. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 661-672.
27. Magne P, Kwon KR, Belser UC, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Crack propensity of porcelain laminate veneers: A simulated operatory evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 327-334.
28. Mc Laughlin G. Porcelain veneers. Dent Clin North Am 1998; 42: 653-656.
29. Meijering AC, Creugers NHJ, Roeters FJM, Mulder J. Survival of three types of veneer restorations in a clinical trial: a 2.5-year interim evaluation. J Dent 1998; 26: 563-568.
30. Nordbo H, Rygh-Thoresen N, Henaug T. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers without incisal overlapping: 3-year results. J Dent 1994; 22: 342-345.
31. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers. A review of the literature. J Dent 2000; 28: 163-177.
32. Pippin DJ, Mixson JM, Soldan-Els AP. Clinical evaluation of restored maxillary incisors: Veneers vs PFM crowns. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 1523-1529.
33. Sadan A, Lemon RR. Combining treatment modalities for tetracycline-discolored teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998; 18: 564-571.
34. Sadowsky SJ. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 433-442.
35. Seymour KG, Cherukara GP, Samarawickrama DY. Stresses within porcelain veneers and the composite lute using different preparation designs. J Prosthodont 2001; 10: 16-21.
36. Shaini FJ, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneer. A retrospective evaluation over a period of 6.5 years. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 553-559.
37. Sheets CG, Taniguchi T. Advantages and limitations in the use of porcelain veneer restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 406-411.
38. Troedson M, Derand T. Effect of margin design, cement polimerization, and angle of loading on stress in porcelain veneers. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 518-524.
39. Wall JG, Reisbick MH, Johnston WM. Incisal edge strength of porcelain laminate veneers restoring mandibular incisors. Int J Prosthodont 1992; 5: 441-446.
40. Walls AW. The use of adhesively retained all-porcelain veneers during management of fractured and worn anterior teet. Part 2: clinical results after 5 years follow-up. Br Dent J 1995; 178: 337-340.
41. Wat PY, Cheung GS, Kei LH. An improved preparation for indirect porcelain veneers. Dent Update 1993; 20: 72-74.
42. Zhang F, Heydecke G, Razzoog ME. Double-layer porcelain veneers: Effect of layering on resulting veneer color. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 425-431.