Rich can get poor: Conversion of hub to non-hub proteins

Systems and Synthetic Biology

Volumn 2, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 75-82

  Tun, Kyaw ^a,c   Rao, Raghuraj Keshava ^b   Samavedham, Lakshminarayanan ^b   Tanaka, Hiroshi ^c   Dhar, Pawan K ^a  

^a RIKEN   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^c TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Connectivity; Hub; Non hub; Poor; Proteins; Rich

Indexed keywords

EUKARYOTA; PROKARYOTA;

EID: 77649191506     PISSN: 18725325     EISSN: 18725333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11693-009-9024-9     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alexeyenko A, Sonnhammer EL (2009) Global networks of functional coupling in eukaryotes from comprehensive data integration. Genome Res 25 (Epub ahead of print).
2. Alexeyenko A, Tamas I, Liu G, Sonnhammer EL (2006) Automatic clustering of orthologs and inparalogs shared by multiple proteomes. Bioinformatics 22: e9-e15. doi: 10. 1093/bioinformatics/btl213.
3. Bader GD, Betel D, Hogue CW (2003) BIND: the biomolecular interaction network database. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 248-250. doi: 10. 1093/nar/gkg056.
4. Barabasi AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286: 509-512. doi: 10. 1126/science. 286. 5439. 509.
5. Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN (2004) Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 5: 101-113. doi: 10. 1038/nrg1272.
6. Brandt S (1983) Statistical and computational methods in data analysis. North Holland.
7. Chatr-Aryamontri A, Ceol A, Palazzi LM et al (2007) MINT: the Molecular INTeraction database. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D572-D574. doi: 10. 1093/nar/gkl950.
8. D'Souza RM, Borgs C, Chayes JT et al (2007) Emergence of tempered preferential attachment from optimization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 6112-6117. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0606779104.
9. Eisenberg E, Levanon EY (2003) Preferential attachment in the protein network evolution. Phys Rev Lett 91(3): 138701. 1-4.
10. Ekman D, Light S, Bjorklund AK, Elofsson A (2006) What properties characterize the hub proteins of the protein-protein interaction network of Saccharomyces cerevisiae? Genome Biol 7: R45. doi: 10. 1186/gb-2006-7-6-r45.
11. Gentleman R, Huber W (2007) Making the most of high-throughput protein-interaction data. Genome Biol 8: 112. doi: 10. 1186/gb-2007-8-10-112.
12. Guimera R, Nunes Amaral LA (2005) Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks. Nature 433: 895-900. doi: 10. 1038/nature03288.
13. Han JD, Bertin N, Hao T et al (2004) Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature 430: 88-93. doi: 10. 1038/nature02555.
14. Han JD, Dupuy D, Bertin N, Cusick ME, Vidal M (2005) Effect of sampling on topology predictions of protein-protein interaction networks. Nat Biotechnol 23(7): 839-844. doi: 10. 1038/nbt1116.
15. Haynes C, Oldfield CJ, Ji F et al (2006) Intrinsic disorder is a common feature of hub proteins from four eukaryotic interactomes. PLOS Comput Biol 2(8): e100. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pcbi. 0020100.
16. Hermjakob H, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Lewington C et al (2004) IntAct: an open source molecular interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res 32: D452-D455. doi: 10. 1093/nar/gkh052.
17. Jensen LJ, Bork P (2008) Biochemistry. Not comparable, but complementary. Science 322: 56-57. doi: 10. 1126/science. 1164801.
18. Joshi-Tope G, Gillespie M, Vastrik I et al (2005) Reactome: a knowledgebase of biological pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 33: D428-D432. doi: 10. 1093/nar/gki072.
19. Khanin R, Wit E (2006) How scale-free are biological networks. J Comput Biol 13(3): 810-818. doi: 10. 1089/cmb. 2006. 13. 810.
20. Kunin V, Pereira-Leal JB, Ouzounis CA (2004) Functional evolution of the yeast protein interaction network. Mol Biol Evol 21: 1171-1176. doi: 10. 1093/molbev/msh085.
21. Li L, Alderson D, Doyle JC, Willinger W (2005) Towards a theory of scale-free graphs: definition, properties, and implications. Internet Math 2(4): 431-523.
22. Light S, Kraulis P, Elofsson A (2005) Preferential attachment in the evolution of metabolic networks. BMC Genomics 6: 159. doi: 10. 1186/1471-2164-6-159.
23. Mishra GR et al (2006) Human protein reference database-2006 update. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D411-D414. doi: 10. 1093/nar/gkj141.
24. Nacher JC, Akutsu T (2007) Recent progress on the analysis of power-law features in complex cellular networks. Cell Biochem Biophys 2007: 37-47. doi: 10. 1007/s12013-007-0040-7.
25. O'Brien KP, Remm M, Sonnhammer EL (2005) Inparanoid: a comprehensive database of eukaryotic orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res 33: D476-D480. doi: 10. 1093/nar/gki107.
26. Pagel M, Meade A, Scott D (2007) Assembly rules for protein networks derived from phylogenetic-statistical analysis of whole genomes. BMC Evol Biol 7(Suppl 1): S16. doi: 10. 1186/1471-2148-7-S1-S16.
27. Qian J, Luscombe NM, Gerstein M (2001) Protein family and fold occurrence in genomes: power-law behaviour and evolutionary model. J Mol Biol 31: 673-681. doi: 10. 1006/jmbi. 2001. 5079.
28. Rodriguez-Caso C, Medina MA, Solé RV (2005) Topology, tinkering and evolution of the human transcription factor network. FEBS J 272: 6423-6434. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1742-4658. 2005. 05041. x.
29. Salwinski L, Miller CS, Smith AJ et al (2004) The database of interacting proteins: 2004 update. Nucleic Acids Res 32: D449-D451. doi: 10. 1093/nar/gkh086.
30. Singh GP, Ganapathi M, Dash D (2007) Role of intrinsic disorder in transient interactions of hub proteins. Proteins 66: 761-765. doi: 10. 1002/prot. 21281.
31. Tanaka R, Yi TM, Doyle J (2005) Some protein interaction data do not exhibit power law statistics. FEBS Lett 579: 5140-5144. doi: 10. 1016/j. febslet. 2005. 08. 024.
32. Wu J, Tan Y, Deng H, Zhu D (2008) Relationship between degree-rank function and degree distribution of protein-protein interaction networks. Comput Biol Chem 32: 1-4. doi: 10. 1016/j. compbiolchem. 2007. 08. 008.