Nonequilibrium fluctuation relations in a quantum coherent conductor

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 104, Issue 8, 2010, Pages

  Nakamura, Shuji ^a   Yamauchi, Yoshiaki ^a   Hashisaka, Masayuki ^a   Chida, Kensaku ^a   Kobayashi, Kensuke ^a   Ono, Teruo ^a   Leturcq, Renaud ^b   Ensslin, Klaus ^c   Saito, Keiji ^d   Utsumi, Yasuhiro ^d   Gossard, Arthur C ^e  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b INSTITUT D ELECTRONIQUE   (France)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^e University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRENT NOISE; FLUCTUATION THEOREMS; FLUCTUATION-DISSIPATION RELATION; NON EQUILIBRIUM; NON-LINEAR REGIMES; NONEQUILIBRIUM FLUCTUATIONS; NYQUIST; ONSAGER; QUANTUM REGIMES;

MAGNETIC FIELDS;

RESISTORS;

EID: 77649153408     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.080602     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. H.B. Callen and T.A. Welton, Phys. Rev. 83, 34 (1951). PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.83.34
2. A. Einstein, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) ANPYA2 0003-3804 322, 549 (1905). 10.1002/andp.19053220806
3. J.B. Johnson, Phys. Rev. 32, 97 (1928). PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.32.97
4. H. Nyquist, Phys. Rev. 32, 110 (1928). PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.32.110
5. M.S. Green, J. Chem. Phys. 22, 398 (1954). JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.1740082
6. R. Kubo, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 12, 570 (1957). JUPSAU 0031-9015 10.1143/JPSJ.12.570
7. L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 38, 2265 (1931); PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.38.2265
8. H.B.G. Casimir, Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 343 (1945). RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.17.343
9. Y.M. Blanter and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rep. 336, 1 (2000). PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00123-4
10. R. Landauer, IBM J. Res. Dev. 1, 223 (1957). IBMJAE 0018-8646
11. D. Sanchéz and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 106802 (2004); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.106802
12. M.L. Polianski and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 76, 205308 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.205308
13. B. Spivak and A. Zyuzin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 226801 (2004). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.226801
14. J. Wei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 256601 (2005); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.256601
15. D.M. Zumbühl, C.M. Marcus, M.P. Hanson, and A.C. Gossard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 206802 (2006); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.206802
16. C.A. Marlow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 116801 (2006); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.116801
17. L. Angers, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 75, 115309 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.115309
18. R. Leturcq, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 126801 (2006); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.126801
19. R. Leturcq, Physica (Amsterdam) 35E, 327 (2006). PELNFM 1386-9477 10.1016/j.physe.2006.08.023
20. J. Tobiska and Yu.V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 72, 235328 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.235328
21. K. Saito and Y. Utsumi, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 78, 115429 (2008); 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.115429
22. Y. Utsumi and K. Saito, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 79, 235311 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.235311
23. H. Förster and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 136805 (2008). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.136805
24. H. Förster and M. Büttiker, arXiv:0903.1431.
25. D. Andrieux, P. Gaspard, T. Monnai, and S. Tasaki, New J. Phys. 11, 043014 (2009). NJOPFM 1367-2630 10.1088/1367-2630/11/4/043014
26. D.J. Evans, E.G.D. Cohen, and G.P. Morriss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2401 (1993). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.2401
27. R. Held, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 262 (1998). APPLAB 0003-6951 10.1063/1.121774
28. R. de-Picciotto, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 389, 162 (1997); 10.1038/38241
29. M. Reznikov, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 399, 238 (1999). 10.1038/20384
30. L. DiCarlo, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 073906 (2006); RSINAK 0034-6748 10.1063/1.2221541
31. M. Hashisaka, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1742-6588 109, 012013 (2008). 10.1088/1742-6596/109/1/012013
32. M. Hashisaka, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 78, 241303(R) (2008); 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.241303
33. S. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 79, 201308(R) (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.201308
34. H. Passing and W.A. Bablok, J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. JCCBDT 0340-076X 21, 709 (1983);
35. as both S 1 (S 1 S or S 1 A) and G 2 (G 2 S or G 2 A) have statistical uncertainties, Passing-Bablok regression is more appropriate than the conventional least-square linear fitting to statistically estimate the error bars of the coefficients between the two values.
36. G.B. Lesovik and R. Loosen, Z. Phys. B ZPCMDN 0722-3277 91, 531 (1993). 10.1007/BF01316834
37. Quantitative disagreement between the experiment in the classical regime and the theory derived from the fluctuation theorem is discussed recently [Y. Utsumi, arXiv:0908.0229].